1
migrant88 1 point ago +1 / -0

His page is blank (all comics deleted or hidden), his gab is private

3
migrant88 3 points ago +3 / -0

Friend told me about it in 2011. I saw his video too in recommended :)

8
migrant88 8 points ago +8 / -0

Stereotypes did not come from nothing

1
migrant88 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not about temples or books, it's about genes

1
migrant88 1 point ago +1 / -0

I saw black screen at first too. But he is doing exactly the same thing that he did before pandemic

1
migrant88 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's accurate and true so that's already something leftist memes don't have. Now they need only to improve and not just be self aware

8
migrant88 8 points ago +8 / -0

I imagined "turn on" like hordes of zombies suddenly going to attack

2
migrant88 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you for those links. I know what I will read today

1
migrant88 1 point ago +1 / -0

"although I'm half-Armenian, half-Jewish, I consider myself Russian because Russian is my native tongue, and I grew up with Russian culture."

1
migrant88 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wasn't there a way to reach to English people? That's what intel is for. Own press in england, talk propaganda (true) to other leaders, prepare them for jews.

So it’s not his fault

In war there's no such thing as "fault". It was not his fault, in that he did nothing wrong. But he could sacrifice some things to win. Let's say Poles were offended that they didn't get invited to some important meeting, and british picked them up asap and told them everything they wanted to hear. Press wasn't much jewified. If Hitler told Poles that they too are great aryans, it would work out. It worked with other central/eastern europeans afterall, ukraine had jews too, so did hungary

Literally did. Repeatedly tried to get defensive alliances with both. Repeatedly wanted white peace with both (after the war began). All communications were rejected

He sent Hess on a parachute. It was a good move but too late. If he did things like these before he was seen as the enemy (who was man of the year according to Time), he could sway opinion so that public liked him

And I know he was forced to war, but he started it. As migas say it, "optics"

1
migrant88 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe in slippery slope. That, same as anarchy is unstable, there always will be people that exploit idealised version of capitalism.

Planned obsolescence, being "professional" (not asking too many questions for example as a hotel worker, always smiling), pay more to get more but not all cause healing patients is not sustainable business model, exploiting enviroment because who cares what happens after we die, all of this are symptoms of money crazed society

I understand you want to see idealised version of capitalism, in which people only trade things that they don't need but others do. But often, capitalism is creating demand, and it results in consumerist society

Why U.S.A has no good soccer team, headphones, few good car companies (highest respected are mercedes/maybach, porsche, lamborghini, ferrari). U.S.A only has mclaren and ssc which is closer to a startup than a big commercial company

Capitalism lacks essence. If you can trade drugs, sex, humans too (don't say billionaires don't do it, although prostitution is already selling humans), everything loses meaning

If you really like this system and had not compared germany technology to american, we won't understand each other. My main issue with capitalism is that everything has to be quantified, even human smiles. It focuses on numbers and actions, and not meaning and a deeper thought. That's why best scientists are corrupted

2
migrant88 2 points ago +2 / -0

He should make more allies, and not have such high ego/honor. He tried but it was not enough.

Not saying what he did was bad. But he lost

So working at all costs for peace with britain, with poland, having a better PR and controlling what others think about him should work. He lost to propaganda, something he was aware that is important. But was it a loss really? Afterall we are here speaking of his ideals. He set a way

1
migrant88 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good questions.

  1. In capitalism, everything can be commodified, no?

  2. Same as there are no successful countriers that call themselves communist, same goes for capitalist. Netherlands, UK, which of them are really successful

  3. It has equality in principles, similarly as capitalism has freedom in principles. None work for their principles, they only think they do and it went wrong because of "something". It just won't work

  4. Post axis countries like Japan, Germany, Hungary, Italy still have some methods from former system. Because of this, many things they make have this quality, and they are in general more effective countries, less wasteful than their capitalist counterparts. Of course some capitalist (and in some cases communist) way of thinking had taken root. But difference between good quality and bad quality often is this way of thinking. Not chasing money

  5. Capitalism forces you to not care, only do your job and care for money. Someone is gonna get sick? Not my problem

5
migrant88 5 points ago +5 / -0

"Davis and the young woman were both arrested but Davis was granted bond"

Is it this famous white privelege? I start to think it refers only to fellow whites

1
migrant88 1 point ago +1 / -0

For me capitalism is a system of free trade, that eventually leads to what America has currently. Similarly as communism is a system of equality, that eventually leads to what China is

1
migrant88 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are you saying that we do not have now "real capitalism"?

I like how it works in Japan. Really effective

1
migrant88 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn't it basically issue of demand? If you waste food, you are hungry. You buy more. More food will be produced for you, and this excesss production could be used for humanitarian goals. Like no waste japanese business system, by telling you this, nuns wanted people to waste less food so overall less food would go to waste and (because of scarcity) remaining food could be distributed to the poor.

Now, it doesn't work so well under capitalism, but in a normal system if everyone got part of food they need, wasted nothing, then poor would not have problems with food. Now waste is included in the price, and nobody respects anything

4
migrant88 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is business model of many cheaper clothing companies. Why do you think they are allowed to put so much on display? Many of it will go to waste

3
migrant88 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is opus dei secret? Weren't they related to catholic church?

14
migrant88 14 points ago +15 / -1

Duality of consumeproduct users

view more: Next ›