One serves the Jews and one doesn't. One works because it's socialism through tax and still rewards hard work (a core White European racial ethic), the other doesn't because it is solely a tool for the Jew to use as a means of subversion.
I know two Mexicans who I consider apart of my family and if I was the CEO of racism I would exempt them from deportation because they are half Mexican and half native (american native not Mexican). You're right that Mexicans are one of the biggest threats, but not because they specifically order themselves socially around conquering us like the Jews do. There sheer numbers + European admixture + them not being subverters by Jews (because they subvert themselves enough) are why they are the biggest threat to North American whites.
Jesus wants us to just barely decide to not stone you faggots. God these people make me misreble.
TRULY, the Holocaust never happened, BUT IT SHOULD HAVE.
Based. Am Norwegian, might use ø in my last name now.
Quick, get the SwampRangers on this!
I just puked, thanks for reminding me.
I am a National Socialist and Christ is King. Ban me.
Jesus Christ, it's Jesus Christ!
That quote is from the English translation of "secret conversations", which is simply the direct translation of the French translation, which is heavy with errors, so yes it is not reliable.
https://www.stormfront.org/forum/t462319/
The entire logos behind the 14 words is unequivocally Hitlerian in origin. David Lane is an obvious grifter, controlled opposition shabbos goy whos job was to destroy legitimacy of pro-white ideology by entwining it with poorly disguised satanism. Same with William Pearce, whom is sadly still widely believed to have been a legitimate NatSoc.
If you don't want to get on a list, here's what the post says:
" Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler, Chapter 8, exactly 88 words: "What we must fight for is to safeguard the existence and reproduction of our race and our people, the sustenance of our children and the purity of our blood, the freedom and independence of the fatherland, so that our people may mature for the fulfillment of the mission allotted it by the creator of the universe. Every thought and every idea, every doctrine and all knowledge, must serve this purpose. And everything must be examined from this point of view and used or rejected according to its utility."
14-word slogans by David Lane: "We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children." "Because the beauty of the White Aryan woman must not perish from the earth." "
Not sure why you're downvoted here. Mere Christianity is so good that it might as well be apart of the small collection of worth reading extra biblical books.
From a academic Biblical perspective, yes x10000
From personal experience, yes x10000
The redpill someone on the JQ first requires them to actually think on and accept obvious facts about the Jews. We as a society are so brainwashed with muh 6 gorrillion that obviously true and irrefutable statements are automatically treated as racist or bigoted. They way to break that initial conditioning is by stating obvious facts that are uncomfortable but aren't clear as to why they are uncomfortable. For instance, "The Jews are all rich". It's true. 99% of Jews are rich. Acknowledging that, especially in public makes people antsy, but the important part is that they don't know why. So they begin to think on why it does, thus forcing them realize their explicit pro-kike bias.
Conservatives we're not pro LGBT in 2015
We are a people of different faiths, but we are one. Which faith conquers the other is not the question; rather, the question is whether Christianity stands or falls.... We tolerate no one in our ranks who attacks the ideas of Christianity... in fact our movement is Christian. We are filled with a desire for Catholics and Protestants to discover one another in the deep distress of our own people.
The national government...will maintain and defend the foundations on which the power of our nation rests. It will offer strong protection to Christianity as the very basis of our collective morality.
I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so.
The National Government will regard it as its first and foremost duty to revive in the nation the spirit of unity and cooperation. It will preserve and defend those basic principles on which our nation has been built. It regards Christianity as the foundation of our national morality, and the family as the basis of national life.
Today Christians ... stand at the head of [this country]... I pledge that I never will tie myself to parties who want to destroy Christianity .. We want to fill our culture again with the Christian spirit ... We want to burn out all the recent immoral developments in literature, in the theater, and in the press - in short, we want to burn out the poison of immorality which has entered into our whole life and culture as a result of liberal excess during the past ... (few) years.
We wish to fill our culture once more with the spirit of Christianity - but not only in theory.
- Adolf Hitler, perhaps the greatest proponent of 1488, on the topic of Christianity.
"Hitler's Table Talk reveals he continued to wish for a unified Protestant Reich Church of Germany for some time after 1937, which had largely proven unsuccessful.[29] This was in line with his earlier policy of uniting all the Protestant churches so they would purvey the new racial and nationalist doctrines of the regime and act as a unifying rather than divisive force in Germany.[30] By 1940, Hitler had abandoned even the syncretist idea of a positive Christianity.[31] According to Thomas Childers, after 1938 Hitler began to publicly support a Nazified version of science, particularly social Darwinism, at the core of Nazi ideology in place of a religious one;[32] a development that is reflected in his increasingly hostile remarks towards religion in the Table Talk.[33] Historian Richard Weikart characterized Hitler's belief in "evolutionary ethics as the expression of the will of God" who routinely "equated the laws of nature and the will of Providence".[34]
In the Table Talk, Hitler praised Julian the Apostate's Three Books Against the Galilaeans, an anti-Christian tract from 362. In the entry dated 21 October 1941, Hitler stated:
When one thinks of the opinions held concerning Christianity by our best minds a hundred, two hundred years ago, one is ashamed to realise how little we have since evolved. I didn't know that Julian the Apostate had passed judgment with such clear-sightedness on Christianity and Christians [...] the Galilean, who later was called the Christ, intended something quite different. He must be regarded as a popular leader who took up His position against Jewry [...] and it's certain that Jesus was not a Jew. The Jews, by the way, regarded Him as the son of a whore—of a whore and a Roman soldier. The decisive falsification of Jesus's doctrine was the work of St. Paul [...] Paul of Tarsus (his name was Saul, before the road to Damascus) was one of those who persecuted Jesus most savagely.[35]
Remarks which have not been challenged include "Christianity is the prototype of Bolshevism: the mobillization by the Jew of the masses of slaves with the object of undermining society".[36] The Table Talk also attributes to Hitler a confidence in science over religion: "Science cannot lie, for it's always striving, according to the momentary state of knowledge, to deduce what is true. When it makes a mistake, it does so in good faith. It's Christianity that's the liar".[37] However, Hitler insisted: "We don't want to educate anyone in atheism".[38] Of the Ten Commandments of the Old Testament, Hitler affirms his belief that they "are a code of living to which there's no refutation. These precepts correspond to irrefragable needs of the human soul; they're inspired by the best religious spirit, and the Churches here support themselves on a solid foundation".[39]
Revisionist viewsEdit In 2003, two challenges appeared to this consensus view. One was from Richard Steigmann-Gall as part of his wider thesis that "leading Nazis in fact considered themselves Christian" or at least understood their movement "within a Christian frame of reference".[40] He argues that several passages in the Table Talk reveal Hitler to have a direct attachment to Christianity,[41] to be a great admirer of Jesus[42] and "gave no indication that he was now agnostic or atheistic",[41] a worldview Hitler continued to denigrate the Soviet Union for promoting.[43] Steigmann-Gall maintains that Hitler's "view of Christianity is fraught with tension and ambiguity" and Hitler's Table Talk shows an "unmistakable rupture" with his earlier religious views,[44] which Steigmann-Gall characterizes as Christian.[45] He attributes this to Hitler's anger at his failure to exert control over the German churches and not anger at Christianity itself.[46] Steigmann-Gall's wider thesis proved highly controversial,[47] although as John S. Conway pointed out, the differences between his thesis and the earlier consensus were mostly about the "degree and timing" of Nazi anti-clericalism.[48]
In the same year, the historical validity of remarks in the English and French translations of the table-talk were challenged in a new partial translation by Richard Carrier and Reinhold Mittschang, who went so far as to call them "entirely untrustworthy",[7] suggesting they had been altered by Francois Genoud.[49] They put forward a new translation of twelve quotations based on Picker and Jochmann's German editions as well as a fragment from the Bormann-Vermerke preserved at the Library of Congress. Carrier maintains that much of Trevor-Roper's English edition is actually a verbatim translation of Genoud's French and not the original German.[10] Carrier's thesis is that an analysis between Picker's original German text and Genoud's French translation reveals that Genoud's version is at best a poor translation, and in certain places contains "blatant distortions".[7] Many of the quotations used to support arguments in favor of Hitler's anti-Christianity are derived from the Genoud–Trevor-Roper translation. Carrier argues that no one "who quotes this text is quoting what Hitler actually said".[7]"
Even Jewpedia openly admits that the large collection of anti-christian quotes allegedly from Hitler's "secret conversations" were falsified and thus are completely untrue.
I have lots of contentment, just need more godliness.
Ironically, he uses "incoherently" incoherently.
"You know what can save me? Screaming at you." "No, that's irrational." "EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE-"
Unironically demon possessed. Say a prayer for this woman.
Jewpedia
Really? I know you can do better than that rabbi
Definitely a Jew. "Whatever the Lord and the mod team want"
Seriously? How much of a faggot do you have to be?
Oy Vey shut it down - Shen Bapiro probably
Yeah I don't understand any of the hate for evangelicals. They're always the most based.
Muh 6 gorrillion Jews gays gypsies