4
C 4 points ago +4 / -0

To clarify - the issue has been resolved in this instance. The fix described here is to prevent it from reoccurring.

Results will be monitored.

3
C [M] 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's fixed in this instance.

Also made an attempt at preventing it from occurring again, but will have to monitor the results.

1
C 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are restrictions. From what it sounds like, you're trying to reply to a message someone else sent you. There's no reason we should block new users from replying in this case (not saying we don't, just saying we shouldn't)

4
C [M] 4 points ago +6 / -2

force global rules on all sub communities

remove sub community owners

No, no, no.

This is a bad path to go down.

There's not a finite supply of Win communities. If one has bad leadership, another should take its place. I understand that this currently isn't possible since community creation isn't open.

Having said that, we don't want to take an entirely hands-off approach (although we have until this point, largely because these aren't native Win communities, they're communities who have migrated here from other platforms - they are not our communities to mess with.)

3
C [M] 3 points ago +4 / -1

Firstly whether moderators of the individual .win communities can even see PMs?

No. Only one person can, and they don't.

2
C 2 points ago +2 / -0

Communities are encouraged to configure their own filters. By default, we only (attempt to) block spam.

2
C 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not possible yet

1
C [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

We have these two meta tags:

<meta name="referrer" content="never">

<meta name="referrer" content="no-referrer">

Correct me if I am wrong, but those should do the job.

It does remind me that we need to handle this on the new mobile beta, though.

4
C [M] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah, unable to give any information about this unfortunately.

8
C 8 points ago +10 / -2

It's not change. Old site remains available.

3
C [M] 3 points ago +3 / -0

It doesn't seem to be by upvotes, or by creation date. It's very confusing.

A combination of upvotes and age.

Are the moderators manually picking the order?

Only for stickied posts.

6
C [M] 6 points ago +6 / -0

The solution would be more communities.

Supporting us (as admins) getting involved in selecting moderators for specific communities isn't a good path to go down.

2
C [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Could you link the domains which have this error?

2
C 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not sure that I understand how the post is still live. Is it included in feeds? It will always still be accessible via the direct link, but the key information will have been removed (title, link, etc)

1
C 1 point ago +1 / -0

Could you link some examples of broken images?

5
C [M] 5 points ago +5 / -0

The problem is the lack of open community creation, not the culture. The solution to these problems is more communities.

1
C 1 point ago +1 / -0

The new mobile site is at m.communities.win

The terminology is a bit mixed right now. The desktop site that I'm referring to is the desktop site and the current mobile site (which is probably the one you're using now)

2
C [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Noted. The new beta mobile site does show all comments (but only supports the hot sort for comments right now - should support the other options within a few days)

I'll look into the feasibility of adding support for showing all comments on the desktop site, and will get back to this thread with the assessment.

Update (53 mins later): I don't think I'm going to have an answer on this today, but discussing solutions.

Update (47 minutes later): Looking like we've got a solution for this, working on a demo now. Too early for an ETA.

1
C 1 point ago +1 / -0

As far as i can tell, the only option for me to move my top 5 wins to the top is to unsubscribe from everything else, allowing those 5 to move to the top, and then resubscribe to others.

This is correct for now, unfortunately.

view more: Next ›