16
AntonioOfVenice 16 points ago +16 / -0

I guess all those pedophiles they got with their Cuties movie did not compensate for the people canceling for it.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

How does the fact that some women divorce 'prove' that women couldn't care less about their partners?

I'm assuming that you're not dumb enough to think that because 70% of divorces are initiated by women, that 70% of women divorce.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

Merely associating with that figure is a smoking gun.

Yeah, I figured. What a vile creature that was.

That's not a fair bet, because if I'm right but they agree to "equal pay" for the professional sexists, you still win.

I hestitate to go further because I don't know what it is about. Does the 'inquiry' have anything at all to do with women? If so, then we probably will get that BS, otherwise not.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

She did it because they probably paid her off.

Who killed and replaced our beloved TheImpossible1?

Though I think that the reward is in the future. Same reason 'democratic' political leaders are in the pockets of corporations. They cannot take bribes while in office, but they can do so afterwards.

I don't recall that.

Figures, cause you're an imposter.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

So, she's innocent? Really?

No, but she did it because she is an apparatchik, not because of your Dastardly Sisterhood plotting to kill you.

Sometimes I think you enjoy being contrarian

Can confirm.

you care about accuracy.

I distinctly recall false claims by you in the past month.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wait, what? What exactly did you think you were proving by that?

19
AntonioOfVenice 19 points ago +19 / -0

Isn't it common in American advertising that almost everyone is black?

I see it more and more here as well, even though almost no one is black.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

I did provide a link.

Not a smoking gun.

The ESL will be banned or allowed depending on how much money winds up in government slush funds and female "football players" salaries.

I'll take the bet that it will not be banned.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

I knew it.

You know it isn't a thing until TheImpossible1 finds a woman to blame for... well, everything.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

From what I have heard, that is because they simply don't reply to 'our kind'.

The reason they did reply to me, is because I asked about a completely unrelated matter where people were contacting advertisers.

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +4 / -2

I wanted to insult her looks, but then I discovered that it's because she had cancer.

Where are you getting 'feminism' from?

When everyone's telling you something is bad, it usually isn't.

This is correct. So you want to make predictions about this?

2
AntonioOfVenice 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because most of them were very open about their political leanings

So elaborate. Which ones, and what did they say that constituted 'openness about their political leanings'?

We all agree of the inevitable consequences of communism because of its politics and those who hold them, so why is it so hard to see Leftism has inevitable consequences because of politics and those who hold them?

It's not inevitable. But if it were, that would not show that people who censor are necessarily on the left.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +3 / -0

I get that you have stupid opinions, but do you also have to be such an insufferable sperg about it?

-1
AntonioOfVenice -1 points ago +1 / -2

ISRAEL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

-1
AntonioOfVenice -1 points ago +1 / -2

The growing rhetoric against it from the conveniently all led by women - who won't see any of their own die if there is a war

Unlike you, women have kids. People attach more importance to their kids, family members and husbands than they do to some rando who shares their gender.

People who aren't crazy like you, that is.

0
AntonioOfVenice 0 points ago +1 / -1

What traitors gave away HK?

No one, he just saw an opportunity to try to blame the situation in Hong Kong on "our worse halves".

Military force is what took HK.

3
AntonioOfVenice 3 points ago +3 / -0

it would've been better if Half-KiA had gone down with David-Me

I take strong exception to that. Not just because of the loss of a community, which forces of good may still reconquer in the future, but that the largest GG community would die such an ignominious death would be absolutely tragic. They'd be citing for years how "KiA was killed by its founder for being too racist", without a shred of evidence, of course.

I also help them with information about admin nonsense and other stuff that helps them not get banned, and they help me. You may not like them. I don't either. But they are our allies. It's the narcissism of small differences to think that they are the enemy. When the outside world can't even tell us apart, it is the height of folly to consider them the enemy.

1
AntonioOfVenice 1 point ago +1 / -0

??? You're a brony?

I just assumed you meant GG, which reportedly also started on 4chan. That should teach me to not pay attention to context. I wondered how on earth you were one of the 10-20 who started GG.

As for that second part, I may or may not believe the same thing, but it's lethal for a forum to allow expression of such views.

5
AntonioOfVenice 5 points ago +5 / -0

He's been on the right side of many issues, including Islam.

People are complicated.

I have great Strange New Respect for Glenn Greenwald, because of his fearless fight against censorship and totalitarian control, even though I used to despise him for what I still think was his inexcusable response to Charlie Hebdo.

view more: Next ›