Just you wait, by the distant year of 2008 the entire north American continent will be underwater AND on fire due to global warming! As the prophet Gore has foretold!
First off, people need to understand that the male/female paradigm has been an unquestioned, UNIVERSAL TRUTH, for 50,000 years.
So in order for us to reject an unquestioned, universal truth that has existed since the beginning of humanity, we would need to have an Earth shattering scientific discovery. I am still waiting for ANY leftist to tell me about this paradigm changing discovery that occurred 10 years ago.
And finally, psychology is a SOFT SCIENCE. It's not like math or physics or chemistry where a theory can effectively be proven. So it's not even possible for that aforementioned scientific discovery to emerge from the field of psychology.
Nope, what actually happened is that a political narrative was formed, and psychologists that were also political ideologues, dutifully pushed it. This is exactly why Marxists INTENTIONALLY targeted the soft sciences in their Long March Through the Institutions.
There is ZERO real science justifying the current child mutilation movement. All the hormone-blocker drugs are prescribed off-label (i.e., there is no official science justifying it). There are zero long-term studies showing that fast-tracking confused children to drugs and surgery has the best long-term patient outcomes.
Yeah. They make big money on the surgery. Plus, the trannies have to take drugs for the rest of their life or their body realizes how badly it was damaged. Zero liability for getting sued by your former patients if they have regrets.
FACT: Because none of the authorized COVID-19 vaccines in the United States contain the live virus that causes COVID-19, the vaccine cannot make you sick with COVID-19.
Flu-Vaccines shed the Flu Virus when jabbed up and gets worse when people keep getting the shots year after year perpetuating the sickness in public.
This applies to a lot of childhood vaccines too. Anytime you see a unvaccinated child get sick, its more than likely it came from parents who jabbed the fuck out of their kid with MMR, DTP etc. They may be "immune" for a short period of time, but they spread that shit around, and then they always blame the Unvaccinated child when its actually the jabbed up fucks running around.
Kind of a genius model creating the problem and solution all in one. Fuck vaccine companies.
I’m not sure the op meant to imply the CDC openly acknowledges their misinformation campaign. Rather, this simply highlights what we now know to be misinformation
The CDC has made all the edits except for the last change about affecting DNA. Like you say, we know this is happening: https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73
Okay fine, I'll elaborate. The title mentions how "they" claimed the science was settled, and then proceeds to show that "they" have been steadily changing the CDC fact sheet on the vaccines. Pretty obvious to me that the implication is that "they" have admitted the science is not settled and have changed their position. Except they haven't, and the supposedly deleted claims are still published on a regular basis on other CDC pages.
I'd also point out that many people here claim that denial of some theory by the government means they are admitting that that theory is true. If you want to take that position, removing these statements means they no longer feel they need to be debunked, or they are now so provably false they don't need to be denied. You can't claim that denials are admissions, and then claim that the removal of those denials are also admissions. And this is of course ignoring the fact that these statements weren't removed or recanted by the CDC; they were merely moved to other fact pages.
Ergo, I call this a misleading post that has little basis in fact.
I don't know about efficacy. Plurality of studies seem to indicate that it does have some efficacy, but it's clearly far less than "they" claimed early on. As for safety, I'd say the jury is still out. Again, most studies indicate that they are safe, and a few that demonstrate harm also point out that said harm is extremely rare, and not on a scale that folks here claimed it would be.
Both sides are exaggerating and misrepresenting their preferred studies, but anyone who reads both sides would have a difficult time saying the majority finding is that the vaccines are ineffective and dangerous.
I put it to you another way: if the vaccines are as dangerous as people here have claimed, how come there's not an overwhelming number of studies showing this fact? Why do the majority of studies indicate very few harmful effects, and very rare or mild effects when they do happen? How come everyone I know that took the vax hasn't dropped dead? How come none of them in fact have dropped dead or developed any apparent long-term side effects?
Not OP but I have this image saved from a 4chan thread, not sure original source. The edits technically aren't accurate (but close). See the trail below. Combined with the things we know are true, it is a good representation of how the "facts" have changed.
Thanks for that breakdown. I'm glad I'm not the only one that noticed this graphic is misleading.
That last paper you cite is also interesting. It is probably not surprising that the mRNA is detectable within the DNA of individual cells, since the purpose of the vaccine was to teach cells to produce the spike protein and trigger an immune response. What is left to learn, however, is whether there's any long-lasting effect from this. In their diagram of DNA sequencing showing the related proteins, it was strong after 6h and steadily fading after 24 and 48. I'd like to see even longer term, to know whether it sticks around. Also, they state:
"At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome."
That's the key element, really, since the cells in your body are constantly replaced based on the cell genome... not from individual cells' DNA, since cells will be subject to all sorts of damaging effects during their lifetime. So this may be unimportant if the effects are temporary and not expressed.
They also state there's no evidence of toxicity or carcinogenic impact of this reverse transcription. And liver cells are particularly keen on absorbing shit and dying off...that's how the liver works.
People never fought against a vaccine this hard before... And when they did fight, CDC put up similar pages to fight against claims of autism, mercury poisoning, aborted baby parts in vaccines, etc. This is not really new.
Next time we have a big fight between communists and Nazis, how bout we stay out and let them kill each other?
Patton was 100% correct when he said he feared we defeated the wrong enemy. I see Nazi Germany similar to the way I see modern Russia. The globalists want to take both of them out, for the same reasons. I don't know how many Jews were killed by Germans simply because they were Jewish, but I know it wasn't nearly what was killed under communism. Stalin didn't discriminate though, he killed everyone.
That's why I said that, I've been down a few rabbit holes, and that hole will completely change because it twists your very thinking and turns it upside down, or rightside up?
Look at what happened to Dr. Andrew Zimmerman when he admitted to the Vaccine court lawyers that Vaccines in certain subsets of people, can cause Autism. He was immediately fired as the leading expert in the vaccine courts because if the truth got out that Vaccines did cause Autism, the vaccine courts would have to pay out all the other plaintiffs who were ruled against by the government defenders testimony. They are now slandering him today.
Its why they repeatedly say they don't cause Autism, because if they admitted it now, it would be very expensive for them considering now-a-days, its alleged reported that 1-53 kids will now have some form of autism.
All evidence points back to immunizations with aluminum in them in addition the repeated inflammation of childrens brain post vaccinations that cause the long term damage + auto immune disorders and a plethora of other hidden health issues.
"False" and let me explain why. They pay out for Vaccine injuries themselves, the overwhelming majority of "vaccine induced autism" claims get denied outright. The largest sum that was awarded in 2010 to a family to a child who received 9 vax's in a visit and triggered a mitochondrial disorder which lead to severe autism in the kid but they still continued to say after the fact that the vaccines "triggered" the underlying mitochondrial condition which lead to the autism and that it was NOT the vaccines themselves.
I can't make this shit up, the vaccine courts will keep their shill defense doctors in place to fight this to the bitter end. This is why they will repeatedly gaslight the public in articles stating "wE dOnT kNoW wHaT cAuSeS aUtIsM bUt iT sUrE aIn'T VaCcIneS!".
In acknowledging Hannah's injuries, the government said vaccines aggravated an unknown mitochondrial disorder Hannah had which didn't "cause" her autism, but "resulted" in it. It's unknown how many other children have similar undiagnosed mitochondrial disorder. All other autism "test cases" have been defeated at trial. Approximately 4,800 are awaiting disposition in federal vaccine court.
Then-director of the Centers for Disease Control Julie Gerberding (who is now President of Merck Vaccines) stated: "The government has made absolutely no statement indicating that vaccines are a cause of autism. This does not represent anything other than a very specific situation and a very sad situation as far as the family of the affected child."
Vaccines are nothing but a subscription based model for vaccine companies to sell to humans with their bullshit guilt driven and faux propaganda while simulataneously being protected from liability if and when they do injur and harm someone whether it be short term or long term auto-immune disorders that don't pop up until later in life. And not to mention a lot of vaccines you give to kids as well as adult flu shots, have been known to cause vaccine shedding up to a couple of weeks after innoculation, perpetuating the illnesses and creating a revolving door of "creating the problem while administering the solution". I would imagine after reading these studies on https://vaccine.guide, anytime an unvaccinated kid gets sick with these childhood diseases in a good health and hygiene area, more often than not, they got it from a recently jabbed up kid who's shedding the virus, but in the end, they ALWAYS blame the unvaccinated child despite the sickness, more than likely, coming from the jabbed up children.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24681843/
Live HAV vaccine had substantial horizontal transmission due to vaccine virus shedding; thus, further monitoring of the safety of virus shedding is warranted.
A lot of this information is new to me and thanks to covid making me question the lies and deceits of vaccines and all of these shit ass companies and corrupt organizations. There's no putting the genie back in the bottle with this shit anymore.
History will lump them in with court astrologers and snake oil grifters. I'm convinced that they don't really understand shit about the immune system, just enough to screw it up.
Same with "climate change"
Yeah, a similar graphic could be made with all of the predictions that have come and gone regarding global warming - or, excuse me, "climate change".
Remember Gore's "an inconvenient truth"? Should be labeled comedy.
I thought NYC was supposed to be underwater by now? I feel cheated.
Just you wait, by the distant year of 2008 the entire north American continent will be underwater AND on fire due to global warming! As the prophet Gore has foretold!
Oh come now, the ocean is not a river in Ohio
Al got paid, mission accomplished for him.
Don't forget Manhattan island under a mile-thick layer of ice!
It is now an inconvenient LIE.
Always was (astronaut_with_gun.jpg)
Sci-fi
Edit: Sci-fi comedy drama
An Untruthful Convenience
But... he was super cereal guys!
Don't forget climate cooling
I recently saw a "save trans kids" protest sign that said the same damn thing.
They claimed the science was settled that you can either have a trans kid or a dead kid.
Absolute bullshit.
First off, people need to understand that the male/female paradigm has been an unquestioned, UNIVERSAL TRUTH, for 50,000 years.
So in order for us to reject an unquestioned, universal truth that has existed since the beginning of humanity, we would need to have an Earth shattering scientific discovery. I am still waiting for ANY leftist to tell me about this paradigm changing discovery that occurred 10 years ago.
And finally, psychology is a SOFT SCIENCE. It's not like math or physics or chemistry where a theory can effectively be proven. So it's not even possible for that aforementioned scientific discovery to emerge from the field of psychology.
Nope, what actually happened is that a political narrative was formed, and psychologists that were also political ideologues, dutifully pushed it. This is exactly why Marxists INTENTIONALLY targeted the soft sciences in their Long March Through the Institutions.
This is exactly what happened in the Weimar Republic.
More like billions of years, though we as humans probably only existed for a couple million, and anatomically modern for about 200,000 or so...
But I'm sure we understood 'man and woman' before we could even form words that meant that.
Psychology can be soft or hard. When my father studied neuropsychology, that was not a soft science.
Your dad likes it hard.
😗 oh myyyy!
That was this:
https://patriots.win/p/16aAIQDcfu/woke-wars-glaads-coming-at-the-n/
There is ZERO real science justifying the current child mutilation movement. All the hormone-blocker drugs are prescribed off-label (i.e., there is no official science justifying it). There are zero long-term studies showing that fast-tracking confused children to drugs and surgery has the best long-term patient outcomes.
But it does have the best long-term financial incomes
That $cience i$ $ettled.
Yeah. They make big money on the surgery. Plus, the trannies have to take drugs for the rest of their life or their body realizes how badly it was damaged. Zero liability for getting sued by your former patients if they have regrets.
Nobody nose.
Has anyone seen my hat?
It's quite smôll
Let's leave Toucan Sam out of this
I remember being told in the 1990's that the ice caps would be gone by 2000 and New York City and the Florida coast would be underwater.
I'm still waiting for the Eastern coastline to raise by 1 foot.
I don't know where this infographic came from, but they still have both of these facts all over the CDC site and on every article about mRNA vaccines.
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/facts.html
They clearly have not changed their position on this as an implied by this post.
True. It'll make you sick with myocarditis.
That's what they said about the regular flu shots. BS.
https://vaccine.guide/asymptomatic-transmission-shedding/influenza/infectious-virus-in-exhaled-breath-of-symptomatic-seasonal-influenza-cases/
Flu-Vaccines shed the Flu Virus when jabbed up and gets worse when people keep getting the shots year after year perpetuating the sickness in public.
This applies to a lot of childhood vaccines too. Anytime you see a unvaccinated child get sick, its more than likely it came from parents who jabbed the fuck out of their kid with MMR, DTP etc. They may be "immune" for a short period of time, but they spread that shit around, and then they always blame the Unvaccinated child when its actually the jabbed up fucks running around.
Kind of a genius model creating the problem and solution all in one. Fuck vaccine companies.
Yep, they dropped the claim that it can't cause other illnesses.
I’m not sure the op meant to imply the CDC openly acknowledges their misinformation campaign. Rather, this simply highlights what we now know to be misinformation
The CDC has made all the edits except for the last change about affecting DNA. Like you say, we know this is happening: https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73
Ah, ok. Looks like Winston Smith has been very busy lately
That's not how this reads at all.
Thanks for elaborating
Okay fine, I'll elaborate. The title mentions how "they" claimed the science was settled, and then proceeds to show that "they" have been steadily changing the CDC fact sheet on the vaccines. Pretty obvious to me that the implication is that "they" have admitted the science is not settled and have changed their position. Except they haven't, and the supposedly deleted claims are still published on a regular basis on other CDC pages.
I'd also point out that many people here claim that denial of some theory by the government means they are admitting that that theory is true. If you want to take that position, removing these statements means they no longer feel they need to be debunked, or they are now so provably false they don't need to be denied. You can't claim that denials are admissions, and then claim that the removal of those denials are also admissions. And this is of course ignoring the fact that these statements weren't removed or recanted by the CDC; they were merely moved to other fact pages.
Ergo, I call this a misleading post that has little basis in fact.
Thanks for clearing up your position on the meme. So where do you stand on the efficacy and safety of the “vaccines”?
I don't know about efficacy. Plurality of studies seem to indicate that it does have some efficacy, but it's clearly far less than "they" claimed early on. As for safety, I'd say the jury is still out. Again, most studies indicate that they are safe, and a few that demonstrate harm also point out that said harm is extremely rare, and not on a scale that folks here claimed it would be.
Both sides are exaggerating and misrepresenting their preferred studies, but anyone who reads both sides would have a difficult time saying the majority finding is that the vaccines are ineffective and dangerous.
I put it to you another way: if the vaccines are as dangerous as people here have claimed, how come there's not an overwhelming number of studies showing this fact? Why do the majority of studies indicate very few harmful effects, and very rare or mild effects when they do happen? How come everyone I know that took the vax hasn't dropped dead? How come none of them in fact have dropped dead or developed any apparent long-term side effects?
Not OP but I have this image saved from a 4chan thread, not sure original source. The edits technically aren't accurate (but close). See the trail below. Combined with the things we know are true, it is a good representation of how the "facts" have changed.
The original "facts": https://web.archive.org/web/20211220012407/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html
Some (clarifying?) changes (now matches LHS of image): https://web.archive.org/web/20220722133644/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html
Erasing last point about mRNA not lasting long in the body: https://web.archive.org/web/20220723102945/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html
Now mRNA is combined with the other vaccine types, but notice they've dropped the claims that they can't cause other illnesses: https://web.archive.org/web/20221010171605/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/how-they-work.html
The RHS image hasn't happened yet, but it should based on this paper: https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73
Spez: Here's a tracker of the changes over time: https://web.archive.org/web/20221001000000*/https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/different-vaccines/mrna.html
Thanks for that breakdown. I'm glad I'm not the only one that noticed this graphic is misleading.
That last paper you cite is also interesting. It is probably not surprising that the mRNA is detectable within the DNA of individual cells, since the purpose of the vaccine was to teach cells to produce the spike protein and trigger an immune response. What is left to learn, however, is whether there's any long-lasting effect from this. In their diagram of DNA sequencing showing the related proteins, it was strong after 6h and steadily fading after 24 and 48. I'd like to see even longer term, to know whether it sticks around. Also, they state:
"At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome."
That's the key element, really, since the cells in your body are constantly replaced based on the cell genome... not from individual cells' DNA, since cells will be subject to all sorts of damaging effects during their lifetime. So this may be unimportant if the effects are temporary and not expressed.
They also state there's no evidence of toxicity or carcinogenic impact of this reverse transcription. And liver cells are particularly keen on absorbing shit and dying off...that's how the liver works.
I hope we see more studies on this angle.
the insane part is they had to build a website to defend this shit.
I've never seen anything remotely similar for flu vaccines.
This is fucking crazy. You'd be retarded to take any of their nonsense.
People never fought against a vaccine this hard before... And when they did fight, CDC put up similar pages to fight against claims of autism, mercury poisoning, aborted baby parts in vaccines, etc. This is not really new.
Dang so they don't alter your DNA? I'm sure glad the CDC let me know the truth!
I didn't say that! Just that they have not changed their position on this.
I really need to call my optometrist.
Do I look I know what a JPEG is?
I made this xD
seeing your own meme get more points after it gets reposted xD
Hat tip for the dank memery! I didn't have a source to credit, so thanks for speaking up.
It's always fun to run into one of your own memes in the wild. One time, someone reposted one of mine on the news.
Next time we have a big fight between communists and Nazis, how bout we stay out and let them kill each other?
Patton was 100% correct when he said he feared we defeated the wrong enemy. I see Nazi Germany similar to the way I see modern Russia. The globalists want to take both of them out, for the same reasons. I don't know how many Jews were killed by Germans simply because they were Jewish, but I know it wasn't nearly what was killed under communism. Stalin didn't discriminate though, he killed everyone.
I think more religious people were killed under Stalin, and deliberately so.
Rabbit hole
That's why I said that, I've been down a few rabbit holes, and that hole will completely change because it twists your very thinking and turns it upside down, or rightside up?
Everything is fake until proven gay
Nothing…….is ever “settled”
Go against "settled" science and you get blackballed and all your funding pulled. Science community is a fuckin scam.
Look at what happened to Dr. Andrew Zimmerman when he admitted to the Vaccine court lawyers that Vaccines in certain subsets of people, can cause Autism. He was immediately fired as the leading expert in the vaccine courts because if the truth got out that Vaccines did cause Autism, the vaccine courts would have to pay out all the other plaintiffs who were ruled against by the government defenders testimony. They are now slandering him today.
Its why they repeatedly say they don't cause Autism, because if they admitted it now, it would be very expensive for them considering now-a-days, its alleged reported that 1-53 kids will now have some form of autism.
All evidence points back to immunizations with aluminum in them in addition the repeated inflammation of childrens brain post vaccinations that cause the long term damage + auto immune disorders and a plethora of other hidden health issues.
US has paid out huge sums over vaccines causing autism.
"False" and let me explain why. They pay out for Vaccine injuries themselves, the overwhelming majority of "vaccine induced autism" claims get denied outright. The largest sum that was awarded in 2010 to a family to a child who received 9 vax's in a visit and triggered a mitochondrial disorder which lead to severe autism in the kid but they still continued to say after the fact that the vaccines "triggered" the underlying mitochondrial condition which lead to the autism and that it was NOT the vaccines themselves.
I can't make this shit up, the vaccine courts will keep their shill defense doctors in place to fight this to the bitter end. This is why they will repeatedly gaslight the public in articles stating "wE dOnT kNoW wHaT cAuSeS aUtIsM bUt iT sUrE aIn'T VaCcIneS!".
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/family-to-receive-15m-plus-in-first-ever-vaccine-autism-court-award/
Vaccines are nothing but a subscription based model for vaccine companies to sell to humans with their bullshit guilt driven and faux propaganda while simulataneously being protected from liability if and when they do injur and harm someone whether it be short term or long term auto-immune disorders that don't pop up until later in life. And not to mention a lot of vaccines you give to kids as well as adult flu shots, have been known to cause vaccine shedding up to a couple of weeks after innoculation, perpetuating the illnesses and creating a revolving door of "creating the problem while administering the solution". I would imagine after reading these studies on https://vaccine.guide, anytime an unvaccinated kid gets sick with these childhood diseases in a good health and hygiene area, more often than not, they got it from a recently jabbed up kid who's shedding the virus, but in the end, they ALWAYS blame the unvaccinated child despite the sickness, more than likely, coming from the jabbed up children.
A lot of this information is new to me and thanks to covid making me question the lies and deceits of vaccines and all of these shit ass companies and corrupt organizations. There's no putting the genie back in the bottle with this shit anymore.
Good info! The situation is horrific.
History will lump them in with court astrologers and snake oil grifters. I'm convinced that they don't really understand shit about the immune system, just enough to screw it up.
Stalin was literally the last of the Bolsheviks. Like highlanders, in the end there could only be one.
Anything that's censored is true
Either true or against the narrative of Idiots.
Covid19 mRNA science has always been settled for me. The 4th panel is getting closer to the settled science as I know it.
A consensus of fools is not scientific and certainly not certainty.
They never even bothered to put "stops you getting COVID". Sad!
Well Done OP. Same thing was done on the Health Canada website (Link)
But, but, but they said time and time again:
"SAFE AND EFFECTIVE"
The same with the lies they are telling the poor people suffering in East Palestine, OH.
Something never widely injected in humans that is not fucking natural to the human body is tOtAlLy [email protected]#
Lol, this would be much funnier if it weren't so damn sad.
For real??
This is my favorite meme I've seen in a while.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_of_images_in_the_Soviet_Union
Now do the Earth is round.
A+ meme
Insufferable assholes. As are all the professionals who go along with this.
How long until that last box is gone?
Source?
Look at my post above for the source.