Comments (132)
sorted by:
JoePlumber 68 points ago +70 / -2


Elencher 67 points ago +68 / -1

Just don't rank her, you don't have to rank them all and they don't get the vote if you don't rank them.

meme_kat 46 points ago +47 / -1

This is correct.

Do not rank Murkowski at all.

jpower 8 points ago +9 / -1

Faux News has Kelly at the very bottom of their long list of candidates.

You have to select "Show more candidates" to even see her.

deleted -4 points ago +1 / -5
jamesbcrazy 18 points ago +19 / -1

Ranking her last is equivalent to ranking everyone else and not ranking her. Instant runoff can never have a person's vote count for their last-choice candidate.

Eatinglue 6 points ago +10 / -4

Charlie Kirk was saying that you HAVE to rank all three or it’s a spoiled ballot.

jamesbcrazy 23 points ago +24 / -1

Nope, the instructions specifically say that a single vote is legal.

dannypipes75 4 points ago +5 / -1

Go watch the veritas video. If you don't rank all three It spoils the whole ballot

Southboundanddown 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't need a video, this go round there was no RCV for the senate race.

dannypipes75 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea it was!

Elencher 4 points ago +8 / -4

Shit could be, but I'd also not trust Charlie Kirk. Best to ask the poll workers and read the instructions yourself. But seriously if they do that, what a fucking joke it's like they're trying to telegraph their fraud.

snoopy3210 1 point ago +3 / -2

Shut up rank Murk last and you will be sure it won’t be spoiled. Poll workers are often democrats.

Bitfypmer 0 points ago +1 / -1

Charlie Kirk banged your Mom.

Rus25rs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes they Are telling people this to try to get people to rink so they can cheat the ranking is all about cheating you actually don’t have to rank at all

snoopy3210 1 point ago +1 / -0


PatriotJuice 4 points ago +5 / -1

Sadly Murkowski is going to win in November because of Ranked Choice Voting, pushed hard by progressives and secretly by her campaign. She will come in second to to Tshibaka by a decent margin, but will siphon enough votes away that Kelly won't get 50%.

Democrats and GOP are on the same ballot, so the Democrats are all choosing Murkowski as their second choice. When the Dem comes in third and is eliminated, all their votes go to Murkowski, pushing her to the top even though she is not the favored GOP candidate.

Patriots can do little about it, as people have floated leaving their other choices blank or ranking Murkowski like 5th. It will almost entirely come down to the Democrat actions at the polls...

Chilkat 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a vote for one, jungle primary. Primary is not rank choice, the top four will go on the November ballot. Murk will get on the November ballot, she has the lefty vote, always has.

lurkwellmyfriends 42 points ago +44 / -2

Ranked choice.

"I didn't win but I won!1!"


suliv 25 points ago +27 / -2

worst voting system ever. Alaska is a red state how is this shit still in place?

1776_Pepe 30 points ago +31 / -1

Red State means what?











Every state legislature that certified Biden electors.

Republicans suck. Red State politicians take our money and fuck us over for the neocon/neolib uniparty.

texas4ever 5 points ago +6 / -1

Abbott is decent, not great. He did some good work with the anti-abortion stuff. The bussing people to DC is also in between a RINO and MAGA. The correct solution of course is to send them back.

Ghostof_PatrickHenry 5 points ago +6 / -1

correct solution is to militarize state forces and deploy them along the border.

txladyvoter 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can volunteer your services.

Ghostof_PatrickHenry 1 point ago +2 / -1

It’s what Kari Lake has already promised to do, if you’re familiar with who she is.

txladyvoter 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am very very familiar with what Kari Lake has promised to do. I watch the MAGA rallies.

solocup 5 points ago +6 / -1

yeh we have near zero political representation

Foomer 2 points ago +6 / -4

There's a difference between RINO states and red states.

1096WilCommenceAgain 2 points ago +3 / -1

There is no Republican there is only RINO cuck.

Biden is in the Whitehouse and it could never have happened without the Republican party putting him there.

Chilkat 1 point ago +1 / -0

No election integrity. 2020 election fraud. The DS is working hard to take this state blue, it isn't for our 3 electoral votes, it's to capture our immense resources.

ObamakilledJoan 14 points ago +16 / -2

Exactly. Alaska is fucked. I cannot believe they are doing that ranked choice bs.

Taqiyya_Mockingbird 15 points ago +15 / -0

Juneau is full of commie boomers.

deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
Quietam_Unum 8 points ago +8 / -0

See Maine Cong. district 2 -- exactly that happened.

EDIT: Clarify what "that" refers to:

"I didn't win but I won!1!"

jamesbcrazy -5 points ago +10 / -15

It's disturbingly common for people here to not realize that IRV actually benefits us in most elections, as it diminishes the effect of the split conservative vote.

In a "normal" primary + first-past-the-post system, Murkowski would probably win the R nom today with under 50%, leaving us no MAGA options in the general. In the new Alaska system, she has to beat another Republican in November.

She had 44% of the vote in 2016 with full Republican support. The only way she beats Tshibaka is if she gets a decent portion of the R vote and most of the Dem/third-party voters pick her over Tshibaka. That's not likely to happen.

ab1ab1 5 points ago +6 / -1

There's a chance you'll find how wrong you are about "actually benefits us" in a few hours when Sarah Palin and Nick Begich III split the conservative vote in the special House election in Alaska, and a Democrat wins because of second-choice votes (probably from Begich voters who despise Palin).

Even if Palin somehow slips through (less likely), or Begich does (more likely; if Palin comes in 3rd place), the ONLY way the liberal Democrat had any chance at all was thanks to Rigged Choice Voting.

Rigged Choice Voting is designed so that liberals of both parties benefit and conservatives never win another election except in the most conservative Republican states -- of which Alaska is definitely NOT one.

That's why liberals simply adore RCV, and when they see how well it works in Alaska -- even if they lose they still came closer than they otherwise would have -- they will spend big bucks (like they did in Alaska in 2020) to get ignorant voters in other states to adopt this rigged game as well.

When Democrats find themselves losing the game, they change the rules.

Foletado 1 point ago +1 / -0

'Splitting the vote' does not happen with Instant-runoff voting (IRV). What happens is that your vote gets transferred to your next most preferred candidate.

lurkwellmyfriends 5 points ago +8 / -3

I dunno. Seems like a way for the incumbent to stay in power no matter what. Convenient.

Throwingway22 4 points ago +5 / -1

That's exactly what it is. Ranked voting is only for the retarded "clever boy" crowd that can't comprehend why their ideas always fail.

Throwingway22 2 points ago +3 / -1

Ranked voting benefits incumbents, not insurgent candidates. Support it if you never want to take back the party.

It's the same retarded logic that convinced people that the 17th amendment would increase their influence.

Foletado 0 points ago +1 / -1

You have it backwards. It benefits newcomers more because people will select them as their first choice and old party or incumbents more.

Throwingway22 0 points ago +1 / -1

Meanwhile, in reality, those extra candidates get eliminated first and their redistributed second place votes will almost exclusively go to the incumbents. Putting a loss for the incumbent into the win column after redistribution.

Retarded faggots like you need to get lost. Show up, cast your vote, but you're too stupid to contribute beyond that.

Foletado 1 point ago +1 / -0

Meanwhile, in reality, those extra candidates get eliminated first

Being eliminated first means that they had the least number of votes as preferred, which means that they never had a chance.

That is simple, retard.

SickOfSatanism 2 points ago +2 / -0

No it doesn't you retarded faggot.

Conservatives only vote republican. Some vote libertarian. They hate each other though, so would only vote once.

Leftists have a half dozen different parties at minimum. They rank them all but ignore the conservative parties. So all those votes get recounted to the Democrat.

If RCV goes into effect, Democrats will ALWAYS win.

BayTiger 1 point ago +1 / -0

It didn’t fucking benefit us in Alaska tonight. Republicans got 61% of the vote tonight but lost the seat to a Democrat.

MobileDev4Trump 27 points ago +29 / -2

Rank choice though. How could you allow that? Might as well hand the Democrats blank ballots and a programmable voting machine.

Yignuced 8 points ago +8 / -0

That’s what we do, isn’t it?

jamesbcrazy -4 points ago +7 / -11

You realize that IRV actually helps us here? Murkowski would probably win a first-past-the-post Republican primary right now, but once it's narrowed down to 2 R candidates we have a better shot of beating her (especially considering most third-party voters won't be going to Murkowski as their #2.)

cyberwar 18 points ago +21 / -3

wrong dude. there is no republican primary. this is a jungle primary and most of the demonrats will rank her 2nd

Yignuced 12 points ago +13 / -1

That’s the grift.

jamesbcrazy -6 points ago +4 / -10

I never said there was. I was talking about a hypothetical if the ballot measure in 2020 failed.

But apparently you lack reading comprehension.

deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
deleted -12 points ago +2 / -14
cyberwar 7 points ago +7 / -0

that's not how it works.

deleted -9 points ago +1 / -10
Throwingway22 0 points ago +1 / -1

"Should" is a blue pilled term.

deleted -7 points ago +1 / -8
Femprep 2 points ago +3 / -1

It works like this. I vote 3rd party as my first choice, Murkowski second and D last. 3rd party doesn’t get enough votes to matter so all the 3rd party votes get redistributed. Murkowski takes my vote and others who voted similar to me, and she wins as a second place.

deleted -8 points ago +1 / -9
Ipray4potus 5 points ago +5 / -0

Trump disagrees.

MobileDev4Trump 4 points ago +4 / -0

No offense but Murkowski's lieutenants are on video laughing at us over allowing IRV because they know they can use it to cheat.

Yignuced 20 points ago +22 / -2

Only choose one candidate! F their ranked choice fraud.

deleted -2 points ago +4 / -6
TLDC 4 points ago +4 / -0

The ballot counts, but if your single pick is eliminated, then your ballot is discarded.

KonyHawk_ProSlaver 0 points ago +1 / -1

How is this not voter disenfranchisement? Other people get 3 votes while you get one? What if I only want one candidate? There are so many things wrong with this system...

littleman -1 points ago +1 / -2

By not picking a second choice you remove yourself. If your first choice gets eliminated, you've said you don't care who wins amongst the others. If that doesn't describe you, pick other choices. It's not rocket science, but it is being gamed by democrats and RINOs.

pburgpait 13 points ago +14 / -1

Rank the democrat second, Murkowski last

Taqiyya_Mockingbird 4 points ago +5 / -1

There are no democrats it’s a primary

Mother_of_gains 11 points ago +11 / -0

We need to expose Murkowski as the terrible shitbag ofa human she is before the general election. Democrats should want to vote for AIDS before putting Murkowski anywhere on their ballot.

p1smo 12 points ago +12 / -0

She’s already been exposed. The only reason she’s still in office is because of fraud.

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
Mad_King_Kalak 9 points ago +9 / -0

Surprise...Murkowski wins the general election as a write in candidate, with unprecedented levels of turn out from small rural communities, just like she did last time she lost the primary to a Tea Party conservative.

Groundpounder 4 points ago +4 / -0

And the signatures will be 100% “ legit “

HoganP 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'll dance a little jig if she pulls this off.

Candygram_for_Mongo 5 points ago +5 / -0

The re-election rate is gross for what should be easy defeats of many of these lizard people (Murkowski) from the swamp. The incumbent class knows how to manipulate the system which they designed to tip scales in their favor. Decades of making special interests rich thanks to Murkowski is the biggest obstacle, hence her best weapon. Not many incumbents fall victim to new blood. This must stop if we are to take back the country from evil.

HoganP 5 points ago +6 / -1

Also, why didn't Palin run for Senate instead of house?

TommyJarvis 5 points ago +5 / -0

In Alaska there’s only 1 district in the house. I’m sure that is a factor

deleted -4 points ago +2 / -6
HoganP 0 points ago +2 / -2

I like Palin because she's never been shown to be a RINO and she's demonstrated that she can get elected in Alaska. Somebody needs to get Murkowski out of that seat and even if they are a RINO there's a low chance it will be worse. She's been supportive of MAGA in recent years, as far as I know.

She was McCain's running mate for the same reason any candidate chooses any VP for their ticket...To round it out. She was good for McCain in the same way Pence was good for Trump...They appeal to people in the base the candidate does not.

You can do what you want, but I never stopped liking Palin since there's never been any real reason to besides the TV saying so. Probably because I understand how politics go. There is no "we". Fuck off.

deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
HoganP 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah because the deep state sticks their puppets in the frozen tundra state with 25 voters as governors, hockey moms, and grandmothers for a decade and a half before springing them. The really really deep long game. Lol

I told you why they selected her and none of it was random. I can't guarantee she won't be s RINO but, from anything she's actually done, there's nothing that indicates that she will be. Your superstitious hysteria about her being on that ticket wasn't that. Besides not necessarily being ready for the national stage, she was preferable to McCain. None of that is bad.

CovfefeAnon 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's Ice Floe Time for RINO Murkowski.

shaven_llama 4 points ago +4 / -0

Uh, today is the primary. The top 4 advance to the general. Guaranteed both Tshibaka and Murkowski advance.

Bloodylouver 4 points ago +5 / -1

Alaska is rino central..

Space_Force [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

I hope you're wrong but we'll find out later tonight.

txladyvoter 3 points ago +3 / -0

AK! I remember you well from your wonderful welcomes to a worker bee in 1989! Many calls singing "ALASKA!" to anyone I knew who would tolerate my voice haha!

Gorgeous state but even more gorgeous people!

I was so thrilled to watch you welcome GEOTUS to a rally!

Rise up, Alaska!!!!

Send Murk back to the swamps she thrives in.

Send Sarah back and forth to DC for she will be your voice of prosperity as she has been before! I've watched Sarah in person and she is wonderful!


Rise again on the power of your people!

VOTE GOP! and send the dems running off the ship like the lemmings that white wolves chase!

God bless you Alaska!

HisShadowX 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am hoping Murkowski loses keep in mind she lost before in a primary and she is one of the few politicians to get elected after she lost her primary in a write in campaign.

I am hoping the people of Alaska are sick of her but to win in a write in campaign means people in a majority went out of their way to write her name in at the ballot box. I think that’s why so many republicans don’t cross her is because she was elected by mandate of the people which is rare.

I’m hoping the people had enough of here but we shall not know until the general election if history repeats itself

jamesbcrazy 4 points ago +5 / -1

It's a top-4 primary, she only needs 20%ish first place votes to advance. She will almost inevitably be one of two R candidates listed in November.

Nameless_Mofo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pretty sure she won that by fraud, not by mandate. If 2020 taught us anything, it's that these corrupt election fuckbags will go to any lengths to keep the swamp in power.

Brellin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Didn't it get recently exposed that they introduced ranked choice voting specifically to ensure that Murkowski will remain in office and never get the boot?

Rus25rs 3 points ago +3 / -0

I voted for Kelly, Palin, and Dunleavy. Didn’t do the rank nonsence- that’s just their way of cheating

Space_Force [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0


MythArcana 3 points ago +3 / -0

Get that damn woman out, Out, OUT! Nothing is worse than some plant in your party voting with the other side on each and every issue.

DonttrustChina 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't think there's a realistic chance Cheney survives the primary, but Murkowski...they have the whole system magically changed there to make sure she'll be on the ballot November, pretty much no matter what, so that she can get all the Dem votes to block a MAGA candidate, essentially giving Democrats veto power over the result of Republican primaries.

What do you call a candidate who wins because all the Democrats vote for them to prevent a Republican from getting into office? A Democrat. Murkowski is, at this point, functionally a Democrat for every realistic purpose.

voxpopuli16 3 points ago +3 / -0

Didn't she lose her primary last time and ran as a write in candidate?

deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
jamesbcrazy -1 points ago +5 / -6

No, ranked choice/instant runoff voting is not illegal. I have no idea why you'd think something like that. The amount of misinformation surrounding IRV on this site is astounding sometimes.

dirtymikeandthebois 2 points ago +4 / -2

He asked a question to clarify, dumb ass. It SHOULD be illegal, it's stupid as hell.

KonyHawk_ProSlaver 1 point ago +1 / -0

It certainly smacks of voter disenfranchisement

FireCrotchPsaki 3 points ago +3 / -0

Alaskans are fucking dumb, they will most certainly vote for cunt Murkowski again

Jordy 1 point ago +1 / -0

She has never won an election up here with more that %50 of the vote.

2016 U.S. Senate CANDIDATE PARTY VOTES PCT. Lisa Murkowski* Republican 138,149 44.5% Joe Miller Libertarian 90,825 29.2 Margaret Stock Independent 41,194 13.3 Others 40,567 13.1 100% reporting (442

2010-This was the year she lost the Republican Primary in Alaska and ran a write in campaign with the name Murkowski and won...here are the results of that: Senate 100% reporting Candidate Party Votes Pct. Ak-murkowski Murkowski — 101,091 39.3% Joe Miller Rep. 90,860 35.3% Scott T. McAdams Dem. 60,053 23.3% Murkowski (contested) — 2,035 0.8% David Haase Lib. 1,459 0.6% Tim Carter — 927 0.4% Other Write-Ins — 612 0.2% Ted Gianoutsos — 458 0.2% Senate Big Board | Senate Map | Race Profile Lead Win

2004 Alaska US senate election results: UNITED STATES SENATE – GOP HOLD

Lisa Murkowski (R-inc) – 149,773 – 48.58%

Tony Knowles (D) – 140,424 – 45.55%

Marc J. Millican (I) – 8,885 – 2.88%

Jerry Sanders (AI) – 3,785 – 1.23%

Jim Sykes (G) – 3,053 – 0.99%

Scott A. Kohlhaas (L) – 1,240 – 0.40%

Ted ‘Big’ Gianoutsos (I) – 732 – 0.24%

Write-ins – 423 – 0.14%

Total Votes – 308,315 – 100.00%

2002 is the year Governor Frank Murkowski appointed his daughter Lisa Murkowski to fill his own U.S. Senate seat made vacant when he resigned from the Senate after being elected governor.

I voted in all of those elections and not once for Murkowski. She is like dog shit that you can't get off of your shoe....believe me there are a lot of us up here trying and again she has NEVER WON AN ELECTION WITH MORE THAN %50 OF THE VOTE.....Ya it sucks.

MajorClark 3 points ago +3 / -0

Murkowski is the Liz Cheney of Alaska

GeorgeKirby69 2 points ago +2 / -0

I may be alone here but I'm not very confident in Alaska

AKBRO93 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good because Murkowski isn't going anywhere.

MMazeo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Doesn't AK have some weirdo rules where multiple candidates qualify for the general? I heard traitor Lisa is a lock to survive today.

Icepck 2 points ago +2 / -0

I always thought you shouldn't vote if you don't know what you're voting for. If I don't know all of the options, but I know maga is the most American, it is easy to pick the first choice. If there is no maga on the ballot, I don't vote.

So how do you do ranked choice in that scenario? Just vote for the maga candidate and ignore the rest? Will they void your vote at that point for not playing their game?

jamesbcrazy 2 points ago +3 / -1

Voters are not required to rank more than one candidate. If you vote for only one candidate, it will count.

Joshua55 2 points ago +2 / -0

Murkowski is Feinstein's bitch.

SaveUsSCOTUS 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does Alaska only have hot women?

Jordy 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is a primary election today. A voter can only pick one candidate. The top four candidates will advance to the mid term where ranked choice voting will be in place for the November mid term. There will also be a Ranked choice election today for the remainder of Don Young’s term who passed away….included today is also a primary for a full term in the house, with the top four advancing to the mid terms in November.

Captain_Grrrr8 2 points ago +2 / -0

Native Corps are backing the dem first, murky second. Murky makes it past the primary but won’t get enough first choice votes to win the general. Also, just don’t rank murky, rank a write in.

jermzdeejd 2 points ago +2 / -0

Seriously...where are the dudes in Alaska.

Not against women leaders I just haven't seen it in Alaska in quite a bit.

CrankyCrab 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hoping for the best, but I won't be surprised if fuckery succeeds. These swamp jackasses rig shit to keep their power.

TrumpChampBelt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Get in your fuckin canoes or your water hoppers and sleds and go vote ya buncha damn Eskimos

PocketPosse 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think Murkowski is primary proof. Last time they removed her via primary, she won on a miracle write in campaign.

Marina 2 points ago +2 / -0


PedoJoey1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let's go Alaskan pedes, get everyone out there to vote and vote this traitor Murkowski out. You deserve better.

GodIsPerfect 2 points ago +2 / -0


waste 1 point ago +1 / -0


Top 4 candidates move to general election regardless of party. Ranked choice voting in general election. I'm sure Murkowski will be in top 4 unfortunately.

AKBRO93 1 point ago +2 / -1

Murkowski isn't going anywhere right now. This will come down between Kelly and Murkowski and Anchorage is full of liberal pussies from california that will vote for Murkowski. Also, Murkowski has spent years funneling money to the remote villages. The Natives in the remote villages are dumb, triple boosted, and still wearing masks because of ADN fear porn and the Natives are voting for what ever name they recognize or are told to vote for by the T.V man (Anchorage Daily News is communist AF and is broadcast in the villages like gospel). The only path would be to somehow coordinate an effort to eliminate Murkowski with this ranked voting but that will not happen, I wouldn't be surprised if it was actually schemed that tshiba somehow be eliminated by RCV.

Alaska is not at all a Red Stronghold because of Anchorage and the Remote Villages. Us Valley Trash just want to fish and hunt and be left the fuck alone. Sorry guys.

Alaska is blue and will finally turn blue as soon as dunleavy loses to Walker

KonyHawk_ProSlaver 3 points ago +3 / -0

Alaska is not blue and never will be.

Doolimite 1 point ago +2 / -1

Right now as we speak, dem operatives in high numbers are on the ground in polling lines in Alaska trying to influence voters and spreading disinfo about the ranking system in order to rig in favor of the incumbent. Way more than Republican operatives.

crash7863 0 points ago +1 / -1

Women don't belong in politics. She will not vote like a man would.