Comments (98)
sorted by:
Aiur1776 87 points ago +87 / -0

She has just discovered the purpose of the 2nd Amendment.

Gnometard 13 points ago +13 / -0


20KAG20 6 points ago +6 / -0

Which they have destroyed enough to murder a lot of us pretty quickly with no way to defend ourselves.

OIKOBOIKO 4 points ago +4 / -0

Tanks can't stand on street corners and they won't rule over a radioactive pile of dirt.

ModernKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is true, but there should be plenty of them in private hands. Along with short and long range artillery.

RMR57 57 points ago +58 / -1

It's ain't easy though, they'll throw you in jail for just talking about it.

TheDonWon 36 points ago +36 / -0

Which is why our stated purpose should be “going for a Guinness world record” on how many people can show up at once

BasedITGuy 5 points ago +5 / -0

We already have that. They took a tour and then went to jail because they forgot their weapons at home.

LightBringerFlex [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0


deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
BannedAccount 30 points ago +30 / -0

That's easy everyone wants to fight however nobody wants to die

LightBringerFlex [S] 32 points ago +32 / -0

No need to fight. Just stop obeying them and they are finished.

ObongoForPrison2020 24 points ago +24 / -0

This. "COVID" was a great test of the basic ability to push back on tyranny. In deep blue New York I was dying to see just ONE other conservative minded person not wearing a mask in the grocery store.

I was so alone. If even 25% had outright refused, those who did it to "fit in" would have stopped. Now you're more 50/50. What a failure.

T-Bear 11 points ago +11 / -0

I did it for the two weeks they requested. As two weeks turned into two months, I stopped wearing the face diaper, and started practicing passive resistance: Not wearing the mask until absolutely given no choice.

After a couple of months, I stepped it up to a more aggressive resistance: I stopped doing business with those demanding obedience to the mask mandates, and refused to wear the mask in all places but the doctors and funeral homes.

I stopped wearing it at church, but we were holding outdoor church at the time. When we moved indoors, I was asked to wear the mask; I confronted them with the data saying they were useless. No more pushback against going maskless.

Now, as more and more evidence is uncovered, those that used to be my biggest critics are now on board that mask policies are next to useless. There are a couple of individuals I know who still go about in the mask, but they are indeed few and far between.

It's a lot of work, but being the example works.

Based_EMT 6 points ago +8 / -2

Lost all respect for Christianity as a whole the day I saw churches shutting down for covid and dogmatically enforcing draconian mask mandates and essentially calling people out as murderers who didn’t mask up.

Still a Christian, but absolutely mother fuck churches everywhere with VERY few exceptions.

T_WIN_2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

I found a based church in Los Angeles.. they never closed, no masks. They sued the County and won. If the church is LQBTQ, masks, shutdown that is a red flag to get as far away as you can, it's not a real church.

T-Bear 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd say - follow the Christ, and not the institutions that bear His name. Follow Him where He will lead, for He is very real.

I have some pretty huge issues with the institutions that bear His name...none with the Christ Himself.

Once a person reads for themselves in the Bible what the principles of Law and Character are required of the citizens to enter His , and what the real atonement is, one cannot help but see that the same puppet strings we see in corporations and governments are just as present within these institutions that bear His name.

Once these puppet strings are seen, one cannot unsee them. The contrast between Christ and His Kingdom, versus the institutions that bear His name, is vast. It is literally like day and night.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
Bramage 0 points ago +1 / -1

Stores and such are not good places to test this. As private property they can demand masks, shirts, shoes, etc etc as a condition of entry.

ObongoForPrison2020 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow. That's exactly what I'm talking about.

ObviousStatementMan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep. Non-compliance literally forces them to lose all power.

deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
67Vert 8 points ago +8 / -0

People are willing to fight, and risk death doing so. But no one is going to do it alone. That would be stupid. We just need a great leader to bring us together and lead the charge.

Jobu567 2 points ago +2 / -0


Trumpdup4prez 5 points ago +5 / -0

Luxury has created a generation of all talk and no game.

Based_EMT 4 points ago +5 / -1

More like every generation since the greatest generation are all talk and no ass to back it up. Didn’t see boomers do a god damn thing about JFK’s assassination or any of the countless other bs they did with the oil embargo and attempted nuclear war with Soviet Union. Leftists have tried to kill America before and no one thus far have done shit to overthrow anyone in gov’t EXCEPT WWII vets when they got back home and found some fuckery afoot.

We’re all to blame. But I’ll be fucking dead before I sit here and allow any one generation to say they’re innocent.

deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
Alpha_Lemming 13 points ago +13 / -0

It's a special moment; baby's first watchlist and getting her own FBI agent.

I'm not crying, you're crying.

sentient-potato 4 points ago +4 / -0

incredibly underrated comment! lol!

Steelflite 12 points ago +13 / -1

I’m wondering why we aren’t doing that

jerrycan111 6 points ago +8 / -2


20KAG20 5 points ago +5 / -0

People still have a lot to lose. Until the day they lost the majority of it.

dagoat4l 10 points ago +10 / -0

Just like Washington and the gang we are supposed to try to solve this without violence. But there comes a time for that. They didn't just jump up and go to war. We are screwing up by allowing the government control us, divide us, have a say over us. We are allowed to talk about over throwing them. It's our job to keep our government in check. They are out of control. Open borders and all the money to Ukrine for them and their buddies

67Vert 7 points ago +7 / -0

We need a modern day Washington to lead us

T-Bear 7 points ago +7 / -0

We also need a James Madison, a Ben Franklin, a Thomas Jefferson, a John Hancock, a John Adams.....I can continue, but you get the drift.

It's not just one man we need. We need several people meeting at what would be a modern equivalent of the Green Dragon pub, to plan, to organize, and to plan what comes next should success be what comes on the other side.

Thrasymachus 5 points ago +5 / -0

The thing is, the powers that be studied revolution, and then they studied communication--how it happens, how much information can be transmitted across conceivable media types, how much persuasion is possible in every scenario, and so on, and they put two and two together. They know that there won't be a Green Dragon pub: the system is too big and too obfuscated.

I'm not saying there won't be something, but it won't be that elegant. And most likely, it'll be the same thing all over again: a new insiders club that neither you nor I will be a part of in any meaningful regard, because we've spent two hundred years shaping our society not around talent or wisdom but who has the most voluminous sociopathy and narcissism to force themselves into the limelight where the multitude of midwits can embrace them.

huntingche 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well put.

Nice username as well.

T-Bear 1 point ago +1 / -0

I cannot disagree with this assessment...

Rubberbunnies 9 points ago +9 / -0

We're not crushed enough yet. Still too comfortable and fat with too much to lose. Kids, job, home...

We're getting there, but we're not there yet.

TGNX 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is one of those "my kid said an inspirational/emotionally moving thing" posts. However, unlike the typical leftie ones, which usually involve prepubescent 6 or 7 year olds (telling), this one involves someone who is approaching the age where they can think for themselves.

I rate it plausible.

pray4peace4 6 points ago +7 / -1


GreyKnight 6 points ago +6 / -0

Well, that is under the preamble of the Declaration of Independence...not a law, but essentially a human right and a heritage we all share. Our enemies do not believe in it, and are under no obligation to surrender or honor our beliefs which is why they are our enemies...we fundamentally disagree on what it means to be what we are.

If we ever try all the way, it means we risk everything in doing so, and not just our lives, families, children and their futures, but the nation itself as well may very well be consumed in the process...it is our duty, but that doesn't mean we skip to the last method of the process either...ultimately I am willing to fight, kill, and die...but should the nation be weakened enough, we will be invaded by outside threats as well...

traveravis 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sad I had to scroll this far to find the Declaration

littleman 1 point ago +1 / -0

The level of ignorance on this site of basic matters like this is staggering. How can people not understand that the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence are two separate documents? One is actual law, the highest law of the land, and the other is good reasoning about why the Colonists rebelled.

If the text of the Declaration were in the Constitution, then there'd be easy, clear legal justification for opposing tyranny, but it's not and so there's not. That doesn't mean the reasoning in the Declaration is wrong, it's just a completely different legal situation.

okboomer59 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Declaration of Independence is the first organic law of the Union, and the first title in the US Code


T-Bear 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would argue that the Declaration of independence is the proclamation of the highest laws of the land - our obligation to uphold the Natural Laws God Himself ordained as Rights to every human being.

But that's just my perspective....

ObviousStatementMan 2 points ago +2 / -0

His point is that an attempted revolution, while completely justified at this very moment, would result in a cascade event that could result in foreign invasion since our Nation was already engineered to be severely weakened over the past 24-36 months.

T-Bear 2 points ago +2 / -0

I understood his point. I was just adding that the DoI is what underscores the right of people to throw off despotic government, not the Constitution.

I understand the cascade events that are poised to happen...I'd say let them bring it.

I am of the opinion the revolution they want, will not go as they plan, simply because their plan is to destroy America's Christian culture (and biblical Christians with them). This necessarily draws God into the equation, whom they don't believe is relevant to their plans.

Should we lose to these bastards, their transhumanist plans to eliminate free will in all but the elite (who will have a "modified free will") means this sin experiment ends pretty quick. Without free will, the Gospel work is finished.

Should these bastard's opposition throw off the WEF/Communist chains, then their plans for world domination by depopulating the world into a slave class and an elite class go right into the ashbin of history.

That said....what replaces the WEF will likely be just as unjust and despotic as what these bastards are proposing, except it will be something most people would willingly agree to.

I see the world currently going through a slow-motion, French-style revolution. The appointed Napoleon figure is simply biding their time.

Brobold 5 points ago +5 / -0

The government told me it's illegal to overthrow the government

SquirreleeDan 5 points ago +5 / -0

Horse will walk all day with a carrot on a stick dangling in front of him....

notmadeinchinadotwin 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm wondering that too.

BombsAway 4 points ago +5 / -1

Because the people think the military will stop them when the military IS the people, belongs to the people, swore an oath TO the constitution & has a duty to remove & replace Biden who threatened us that “we need f15s & nukes” - WE DO have f15s & nukes, the military is OURS & the military appears to be on-board with the corrupt DINOs & their RINOs so until we can get the military realizing that it is their duty, then the people will remain afraid of the military. It is a bit jumbled of an explanation, however, that is where we are right now.

deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
huntingche 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree and most of the military would do no such thing. Only a certain percent are trigger pullers and the rest are support. E-3 Dipshit who passes out basketballs at the gym and E-4 Lopez who works in Pay are not going to be taking out American citizens.

Caveat is the "new woke military" with its recruits joining already indoctrinated with SJW/commie values. Those are the "military" to be concerned about. Because they are the ones who would be lining people up against walls IF, (big IF) they were capable.

Private Snuffy that refused the vax and got kicked out is on our side. Emma with two moms is not worth a shit as a soldier anyway and would get fucked up in a firefight.

South_Florida_Guy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good question

Gnometard 3 points ago +3 / -0

Low T and the special snowflakes that'll reply saying they're not Low T, they just are able to tolerate a little more bullshit.

DJT_JR6544 3 points ago +3 / -0

The thing that makes me think this is authentic is that a teenager can reason moral dilemmas.

Liberals tend to make these kinds of posts about their 2-4 year old being wise beyond their years like Kumala saying, "fweedom!" So fake and gay.

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
Based_EMT 2 points ago +2 / -0

Muh optics! Muh glowies. Hurr durr anyone with a spine is a commie glowie FBI agent. Derp.

You’re exactly right.

ObviousStatementMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

... And extreme censorship, and a corrupt DOJ that is likely monitoring everything.

The first part of an organized overthrow is communicating said event. If the ability to communicate is compromised and they can arrest people/hold the indefinitely before any actual crimes are committed? It's kind of difficult.

We're massively populated now compared to previous revolutions, many are burnt out and became apathetic/hopeless, the rest are useful idiots and sheep.

I'm not making excuses. I'm just sayin' - it's a hell of a lot easier said than done when you think through the logistics required.

ckover9000 3 points ago +3 / -0

Everybody wants to be a patriot until it's time to do some patriot shit.

Based_EMT 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have said this before and will say it again. If the call went out tomorrow I’d be there immediately.

Swear it on my mother’s grave. If it happens I’ll introduce myself to anyone from PDW or TDW and tell you my forum name. Even if it was all in vain and only a small group of us shows up to get our asses shot off, I’d die happy. At least we fucking did something.

T-Bear 3 points ago +3 / -0

Can't argue with that point.

250 years ago, it was 3% of the population, with the support (logistics, information, shelter, etc) of another 12%.

We got our Republic through the efforts of 15% of the population, who did patriot stuff when it was time to do patriot stuff.

About 20% supported the Crown; everyone else couldn't be bothered - they just wanted to shamble along, and would comply with whomever won the war....

Geralt_of_Rivia1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why women make horrible world leaders - they are incapable of understanding the downside of state violence

yudsfpbc 2 points ago +3 / -1

Repeat after me: the so-called federal and state governments are unlawful foreign occupations.

It feels good to realize the truth. Loyalty to the government is treadon to our country.

Killerko 2 points ago +2 / -0

Great question...

alien123 2 points ago +2 / -0

the bill or rights is like a 5 minute read if you take your time.

each amendment is like 1 or 2 sentences

if you have not done so, go read it now.

your so lazy I bet you won't even click this link:


alien123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Amendment III

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Amendment VI

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

Amendment VII

In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

Amendment VIII

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

Amendment IX

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Str16x 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cause we’re pussies

AVeryNakedMan 2 points ago +2 / -0

It actually says that in the Declaration of Independence.

PhilMcKankles 2 points ago +2 / -0

I haven't memorized the Constitution, but I'm pretty sure that's The Declaration of Independence you are referring to.
It's past that time though. We should have done our duty on 11/4/20

trauncher 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually, thats the Declaration of Independence... not the constitution. it says:

"That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

-- Declaration of Independence.

and it's LONG PAST time to Alter and Abolish.

Jackdaniell 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ya and then everyone clapped

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
AllahFubar 1 point ago +1 / -0


LaughlinPrepper1 1 point ago +3 / -2

Because we are a bunch of tame, scared, castrated pussies. Myself included....Oh, what? Not you? Prove it

runonce 4 points ago +4 / -0

You watch your mouth mister, If I didn't have to cut the grass right now I'd make this comment much more strongly worded.

LaughlinPrepper1 2 points ago +3 / -1

Ha. Yep, I get it amigo. We are all 'to busy' or 'have too much to lose'. There just isn't enough pain, yet.

MAGASquatch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Constitution Wednesday & Range Day Thursday

Polinco 1 point ago +1 / -0

Great question.

PatriotSailor 1 point ago +3 / -2

Tens of thousands of troops are ready to leave their families at a moments notice to suck Bidens cock and simply do what they're told. They did it for his inauguration.

SteersBeersandQueers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good question

freespecter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because folks of that kind don’t organize, or the feds infiltrate. :/

minotaurbeach 1 point ago +1 / -0

She is not wrong.

__bryan 1 point ago +1 / -0

let her go off to college and ride the cock carousel and she will change her tune real quick.

Grond999 1 point ago +1 / -0

A move against the captured MSM, Uniparty, DOJ, FBI, CIA, National Guard, police & US military. With surveillance of communications adding to the complexity. Times have changed.

MythArcana 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because Tucker is on TV.

Jappletime 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good Question

runonce 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'll tell you one thing, I better be getting at least one blue helmet outta this.

Weallseethetruth 1 point ago +1 / -0

Me fucking too!!

PatrickHangry 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm surprised she got that from the Constitution. It's far more explicit in the Declaration of Independence...

Badradness 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agree. Slay them all. Vile cunt traitors

Mungo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Smart young lady.

JoeBidensDentures 0 points ago +1 / -1

Glowie teenager.

Fresnor 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's also Congress' job to ensure that the militia is trained and armed.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
runonce 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let's invite the embedded grifters to participate in their demise.

Qwikphaze 0 points ago +1 / -1

Because we are soft!