2158
Comments (199)
sorted by:
141
BlmAnimalFarmFodder 141 points ago +150 / -9

This is all by design to create angst and animosity towards each other. If we are busy hating each other, we will never fight against the ones actually stirring the pot.

Here's a quote that is said to be from Isreal Cohen in 1917. It is labeled as a hoax according to Wikipedia who attribute the hoax to Eustace Mullins, but it IS interesting that such a quote labled as a hoax since 1957, is the reality we currently find ourselves in. Thomas Abernethy from Mississippi added it to the Congressional Record, Vol. 103, p. 8559, June 7, 1957. The statement ends up being on page 29/38 of the second section from the Congressional record pdf

We must realize that our party's most powerful weapon is racial tensions. By propounding into the consciousness of the dark races that for centuries they have been oppressed by whites, we can mold them to the program of the Communist Party. In America we will aim for subtle victory. While inflaming the Negro minority against the whites, we will endeavor to instill in the whites a guilt complex for their exploitation of the Negroes. We will aid the Negroes to rise in prominence in every walk of life, in the professions and in the world of sports and entertainment. With this prestige, the Negro will be able to intermarry with the whites and begin a process which will deliver America to our cause."

The elite society shapers want to destroy you, and they will do it under the guise of tolerance.

Slanderous words like racist and white supremacy have been over used to describe anyone that doesn't capitulate to their narratives. The words have lost their power and meaning. Whites should all embrace the fact they are going to be considered racist JUST because they are white.

Every other race is allowed to have their pride, but if you aren't ashamed of your whiteness then you are a white supremacist/racist/nazi. The elite fear you because it is you who has the numbers and power to stop them should you unite with a common goal.

We hear a lot about white supremacy, but I don't know a single white supremacist or see white supremacy influence in my daily life. Do you? I do however benefit from white inventions, social constructs and their influence on cival society, but I am not seeing or experiencing hateful white supremacy in anyway.

Whites make up a majority of the population, yet I don't see their numbers making up the majority of violent crimes or among the wealthy ruling class elites. I do see other races make up those totals and neither one of them are politically correct to call attention to. Again, its odd that the propaganda narratives are all focused on white supremacy when their numbers are not reflected in violent crimes or extreme wealth.

Supremacism of any kind is wrong. Thinking you are a more worthy important being because of your race is irresponsible, dangerous, narcissistic and wrong. At the same time I do not believe that forced diversity is a strength. All races have their strengths and each race should be able to hone in and fortify those strengths.

If it were possible for the races to come together naturally to work towards a common goal on equal footing united under God, then that would be worth celebrating. That is unfortunatly not our reality as there are those that use our empathy and care against us to destroy us. What we see now is the forced dismantling of one race in order to forcefully prop up others.

44
Jaqen 44 points ago +45 / -1

Posts like this are why I stick around here. Also zerohedge links.

35
Killroyomega 35 points ago +50 / -15

When the races come together naturally to work towards a common goal on equal footing, that would be worth celebrating.

They never will and you will always lose with this attitude.

Every race except whites act with racial solidarity and they will never stop because it's hardwired genetically.

The only fix is for whites to once more act with racial solidarity as well.

I hate you and everything you stand for. Your degenerate and obviously false ideology is why we're in this mess to begin with.

34
HungrySanta 34 points ago +38 / -4

He’s the embodiment of this comment from the French Intel chief

“In such a situation, it happens that minorities are violent winners, and majorities placid losers.

He’s content to be a placid (peaceful) loser.

I’m not interested in sacrificing my family for some feel good fairy tale crafted out of falsehoods

10
BlmAnimalFarmFodder 10 points ago +12 / -2

You are both reading into my words what you want to. I never said it is realistic or idealistic. If we lived in a perfect world where people wanted to be peaceful and actually work towards a common goal then that would be worth celebrating. That is not the reality of our world. The reality is we are up against people that hate us and want to destroy everything we stand for and then erase the fact that we ever existed. They use our empathy against us and the worst thing we can do is project our capacity for care on them. There are those that are born without the ability to care for anyone other than themselves and they won't hesitate to destroy you. I did edit my comment some to clarify my intent.

NEVER sacrifice your family for tolerance and acceptance. Your family is the one true investment of this world and your only legacy that matters.

Many are conforming to accept wickedness as normal and decency as unnatural. They demand your tolerance while they carry out all matter of wickedness as the social norm.

Key word here is what they call "Tolerance". It is the exact opposite. What they mean by tolerance, is to capitulate to their leftist doctrines at the sacrifice of your own values. Hutton Gibson said it well,

Tolerance is the last virtue of a depraved society. When an immoral society has blatantly and proudly violated all the commandments, it insists upon one last virtue, tolerance for its immorality. It will not tolerate condemnation of its perversions. It creates a whole new world in which only the intolerant critic of intolerable evil is evil."

23
Building7 23 points ago +25 / -2

I was going to reply negatively to you, but I was thinking it through and you are completely right.

I love the idealistic vision of all races working together in harmony, but where has that happened. Do any other races work together with non-white races in a way that is not self serving?

Chinese exploit the blacks and south east asians, the indians exploit the arabs, the arabs enslave the blacks and take the passports of pacific islanders to force them to work at slave wages. They only time they sing A Kuna Matata is when they want access to western society. And even then, they rarely if ever integrate.

So your post was good and i am happy i did not reflexively react to it.

16
Wanderlust 16 points ago +16 / -0

It will never happen on its own. It can only happen with God.

14
FelixtheMan 14 points ago +14 / -0

God is the only way IMO, with a fee outliers being nationalistic American lovers, whereas the republic stays true to Christian guidance.

So in other words we are screwed, too many politically charged churches and too few people that have faith. God had been replaced with politics and social media, these people are religious zealots with no foundation, only a desire to follow the new thing into oblivion.

5
Wanderlust 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's possible America is screwed. I hope not, love it quite a bit. But God saw all this coming a long time ago, and in the end, He wins.

1
AmericanJawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd argue he's already won and we're just living in the epilogue.

-6
unicornpoop -6 points ago +2 / -8

God "chose" a single race of people to genocide competing cultures and prepare themselves for an eternal rule over all other races. I think you might need to read the bible.

4
Wanderlust 4 points ago +5 / -1

God's people are a family, but a family you can choose to join or leave. Christ made it clear it's about Faith and not blood relation.

7
BlmAnimalFarmFodder 7 points ago +7 / -0

I am happy you let the words resonate with you and thought about what was being said before you put words to them.

Truth be told, I know it is NOT realistic. If we lived in a perfect world where people wanted to be peaceful and actually work towards a common goal with the help from God, that would be worth celebrating. Unfortunately it is not the reality of our world. The reality is we are up against people that hate us and want to destroy everything we stand for and then erase the fact that we ever existed. They use our empathy against us and the worst thing we can do is project our capacity for care on them. There are those that are born without the ability to care for anyone other than themselves and they won't hesitate to destroy you.

NEVER sacrifice your family for tolerance and acceptance. Your family is the true currency of the world and your only legacy that matters.

Many are conforming to accept wickedness as normal and decency as unnatural. They demand your tolerance while they carry out all matter of wickedness as the social norm.

Key word here is what they call "Tolerance". It is the exact opposite. What they mean by tolerance, is to capitulate to their leftist doctrines at the sacrifice of your own values. Hutton Gibson said it well,

Tolerance is the last virtue of a depraved society. When an immoral society has blatantly and proudly violated all the commandments, it insists upon one last virtue, tolerance for its immorality. It will not tolerate condemnation of its perversions. It creates a whole new world in which only the intolerant critic of intolerable evil is evil."

Nice name by the way! More people need to look onto that topic!

0
labiator 0 points ago +1 / -1

A building with a huge gouge out of one corner that burned for hours and was expected by firemen to fall and did.

6
BlmAnimalFarmFodder 6 points ago +6 / -0

Sure! There's also this little bit of info as well.

There are 3,000 architects along with investigators and leading forensic structural engineers that have proven 911 was caused by demolitions. See architects and engineers for truths site.

They provided all the evidence to Barr and he remained silent and did NOTHING with the information. In April of 2020, Bar refused to release documents citing national security concerns.

Here is the extensive 4 year computer modeling data that brought down building 7. It wasn't fire and debris or exploding diesel, it was there near simultaneous destruction of every support column.

The report, models and 900GB of open data can all be found there.

This video should be seen by everyone. It's not tin foil hat BS. It's from the first responders that were there and engineers that have studied the evidence. It was originally streamed live on Sep 11, 2019, the 18th anniversary of the September 11th attacks presented by 9/11 first responder Christopher Gioia, a commissioner of the Franklin Square and Munson Fire District in New York

Here's the BBC video reporting on the collapse of building 7 before it actually collapsed.

Fireman describe hearing explosions

Trump shortly after 9/11 saying a plane by itself without some kind of aid should not have been able to penetrate the steel beams. He reminds people of the structural strength of the building and how it survived a bombing at its foundation.

Larry Silverstein where he says , "They made the decision to pull it"

Multiple view points of building 7 collapsing in it's own footprint with no structural resistance at free fall gravity speeds.

Here is the side of building 7 that took the brunt of the damage. Surface damage along with burning office equipment was supposedly enough to bring down building 7 with the same efficiency as vaporizing every support column within a second of each other.

At the 3:17 mark of this video, there is a building with MAJOR structural damage MUCH worse than building 7 and it doesn't just collapse neatly in on itself, vaporizing into dust. It sways and then topples over in a rolling motion. Buildings don't just collapse conveniently in their own footprint, reduced to ruble and dust within seconds with out expertly planned intentional intervention.

The first critical temperature of 600° C (1,100° F) is where steel loses about half its strength.
Steel will melt at 1510 degrees C (2750°F). That kind of heat should be able to incinerate humans instantly, how then were there testimony from survivors at or near the impact site?

Here are statements from three eye-witnesses that provide evidence that the heating due to the jet fuel was indeed minimal.

Donovan Cowan was in an open elevator at the 78th floor sky-lobby (one of the impact floors of the South Tower) when the aircraft hit. He has been quoted as saying: 

"We went into the elevator. As soon as I hit the button, that's when there was a big boom. We both got knocked down. I remember feeling this intense heat. The doors were still open. The heat lasted for maybe 15 to 20 seconds I guess. Then it stopped."

Stanley Praimnath was on the 81st floor of the South Tower: 

"The plane impacts. I try to get up and then I realize that I'm covered up to my shoulder in debris. And when I'm digging through under all this rubble, I can see the bottom wing starting to burn, and that wing is wedged 20 feet in my office doorway."

Ling Young was in her 78th floor office:

 "Only in my area were people alive, and the people alive were from my office. I figured that out later because I sat around in there for 10 or 15 minutes. That's how I got so burned."

Neither Stanley Praimnath nor Donovan Cowan nor Ling Young were cooked by the jet fuel fire. All three survived.

2
labiator 2 points ago +3 / -1

97 percent of scientists agree that there is global warming lol.

1
labiator 1 point ago +2 / -1

Trump is not an engineer. The buildings were designed to absorb a 707 strike not a fully laden 757. The freefall rate fiction is just that. Fiction. Video evidence proves this. They stood for an hour before collapsing which is remarkable. Building 7 may very well have been finished off with explosives in a controlled demolition but I don't know for sure.

2
BlmAnimalFarmFodder 2 points ago +2 / -0

True, but he also knows a thing or two more than you or I when it comes to buildings. However, I'm not interested in trying to sway your opinion or convince you on a topic you have already decided on. If you have already looked into this information and not just blindly accepted the official narrative and that's how you have arrived at your conclusion, then I have no problem with that. We disagree on the final assessment of the information, but hopefully you at least looked into things for yourself.

-1
covok48 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Fed.

5
Wanderlust 5 points ago +5 / -0

It only happens when the world cares more about Christ than anything else.

3
FajitaFiesta 3 points ago +3 / -0

if a boat was sinking, every race would choose to save their own, before a white person.

3
ChuckedIntoAVan 3 points ago +3 / -0

The white person would save everyone but the other white people, so they don’t seem racist. The other drowning white people would support this and feel very good about themselves as they died.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
6
SaltyKrakenBalls 6 points ago +8 / -2

This one goes into the saved folder. Well stated tidbit of truth FREN.

5
AlphabetAgencyFags 5 points ago +5 / -0

Agreed, and very well said. I have been painfully aware of all these truths for many years now. We are living a 100 year long pysop essentially. The communists who are funded by the international bankers, have been playing the Long con

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
AlphabetAgencyFags 2 points ago +3 / -1

Oh I know, if you go through my post history I have done so on many many occasions. Usually the discussion becomes derailed from those soon I don’t want to hear it due to thier programming

2
MickMoss1 2 points ago +3 / -1

Fair enough

2
GeorgeLincolnRockwel 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Protocols of Zion

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
41
Sirjames 41 points ago +42 / -1

Multi cultural society usually in my opinion ends with the death of the original culture and in its seems most cases also ends with the death of the original peoples as well.

Multi cultural society is ultimately what destroyed the Roman Empire and many more before it. It’s even what led to the death of Millions of Jews in Europe and millions of Armenians in Turkey and Armenia. It’s what has an untold number of Muslims as slaves in China today and what will ultimately destroy the west as a whole.

Multi cultural appreciation is great and lends to the building of a greater society when the original peoples take and learn but when millions of immigrants of a foreign culture descend on another especially when that peoples population is smaller it can be sniffed out in the blink of an eye and even larger ones will slowly be destroyed by the overwhelming number and size of the cultural infectious culture that seeks to replace or displace that culture in order for the invaded culture to survive in the new land. When this happens we have clashes of people fighting and in most cases even death. Think of a hundred Mexicans moving into the middle of Compton overnight or Beverly Hills. I can’t imagine in either scenarios that but ending in somebody’s death and constantly clashing cultures.

Mexicans are just an example but where I live Pakistani immigrants have nearly ran off all whites, black and Mexican immigrants from an entire apartment complex that housed over 300 families and now it’s almost exclusively Pakistani or some other Indian racial groups.

15
Bax101 15 points ago +15 / -0

It's a form of warfare used by the World Economic Forum and funded currently by Soros. It's part of his open warfare against all border nations.

12
Tellsyouhow 12 points ago +12 / -0

If I remember right the Caribbean is now 100% descendants of African slaves with the indigenous population dying out mostly due to disease. Jamaicans etc would be very different now if slaves hadn't arrived there

3
MickMoss1 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Whites in Haiti weren't killed by disease....

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Grond999 3 points ago +3 / -0

There are no true multicultural societies, because a true multicultural society would have to have multiple cultural concurrent systems of law, punishment, medicine and more. Malaysia has a partial dual law system for muslims vs non-muslims.

1
Nikola_S1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Indonesia somewhat fits your description.

1
Grond999 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, Aceh to the north within Indonesia has stronger Sharia Law. I'm not sure about concurrent laws for various cultures on the same land though. Malaysia has a little.

1
Nikola_S1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Marriage law recognizes only religious marriage, so the law of each religion is followed concurrently. Not sure if there are other such cases.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
labiator 0 points ago +1 / -1

If Russia hadn't stepped in we'd be reading now of a genocide in the Ukraine of ethnic Russians

33
Trump2024 33 points ago +35 / -2

Huh, it's like nationalism might not be a bad idea.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
8
rebuildingMyself 8 points ago +8 / -0

Oh, if you notice, it's perfectly fine to support other countries being nationalist but never the nations targeted for multiculturalism. For example, removing the host nation's flag as to not offend a foreign immigrant's delicate sensibilities.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Grond999 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those fighting for a single global nation are still nationalists for that nation (even if it is a concept at this stage).

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
Grond999 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some leftists may claim they are against nationalism, yet they simply striving for larger nations, or a single global nation. And to those, they are nationalists.

-1
Trump2024 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Amen fren!

1
Grond999 1 point ago +1 / -0

A single global nation will require nationalism, lest it fracture back into a diversity of nations.

1
Demonspawn 1 point ago +1 / -0

And about the only way you have the entire Earth as one nation is alien invasion.

The greatest uniter in all of history is a common enemy.

-1
Grond999 -1 points ago +2 / -3

The EU basically has nationalists defending it.

3
Trump2024 3 points ago +5 / -2

The EU basically has Soros tearing apart the sentiment of nationalism. Who are these defenders you mention?

-2
Grond999 -2 points ago +1 / -3

EU nationalists defend the EU nation. Soros is a nationalist for the EU and eventually a single global nation.

The EU nation has: Parliament, Courts, Laws, Trade agreements, borders, banks, EU currency, vaccine/passport in the works since 2018, police and much more.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
Trump2024 0 points ago +2 / -2

SHUT IT DOWN!!!

-1
Trump2024 -1 points ago +1 / -2

The key word I'm focusing on is "defending" which they clearly are not doing. Thanks for giving me the definition of who is SUPPOSED to do what.

Again I'll ask. WHO is defending the nationalists? I doubt anyone can disagree that Europe is being destroyed by Soros driven multiculturalism and NOT nationalism.

1
Grond999 1 point ago +1 / -0

Soros is a nationalist for the EU nation (it is not a nation I want). Soros is also a nationalist for a single global nation (it is not a nation I want). I want a large diversity of nations.

The EU nation has one system of law, punishment and medicine. This is hardly multicultural. People from various cultures are expected to conform to one cultural system.

20
Susurro 20 points ago +20 / -0

Modern history laments the expulsion of the Moors from Europe in the middle ages..... but never discusses why it got to the point that Europeans decided they had to take such a dramatic step. 🤔

2
stevenedwards 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's the based version of this, why were the moors expelled? I'd like to move to Northern Spain, luckily the moors had a hard time of conquering these northern areas but i don't want a horde coming through morocco while I'm living in Spain... Just interested, can you point to based docs about this expulsion?

3
Susurro 3 points ago +3 / -0

“The collapse of the caliphate shortly after attaining its military zenith was partly due to the weakening of Umayyad authority by al-Manṣūr’s dictatorship but mostly due to continuous hostilities between Arabs, Berbers, slave officials, Jews, native Spanish converts to Islam, and Arabized Christians (Mozarabs).”

One paragraph is all you get to try to understand why this massive reversal began. 🤫

https://www.britannica.com/place/Caliphate-of-Cordoba

1
D3PL0R4BL3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Moores controlled Portugal for around 900 years, until they were finally ousted by Teutonic Knights around 1500, I believe.

16
ChelseaHubbell 16 points ago +19 / -3

No shit Sherlock. When we stayed from melting pot to multi cultural we were fucked

13
Dirk_Diggler 13 points ago +14 / -1

Just going to piggyback on you comment to address the word “melting-pot.” What the fuck even is that? When have you EVER seen a literal melting pot of any sort, I mean literally? Want to know why that is? Because it is a worthless device and metaphor.

You can’t just melt a bunch of different things in a pot or a “pot” and expect something of value to come from that. In fact the more different things you put in a melting pot, the more of a fucking mess you have.

Fuck in the most literal sense a “melting-pot” becomes one of the most racist metaphors I can think of. Like smelting ore, were the good shit is concentrated and the slag and impurities are discarded.

Anyways, what I was getting at is “melting-pot” is a dumb fucking metaphor.

10
Viewer01 10 points ago +11 / -1

It was a term for when various white ethnicities came into the us.

4
covok48 4 points ago +6 / -2

Correct. White aka something of value.

1
freespecter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kinky

8
MR_FROG_TRUMP 8 points ago +8 / -0

I see that phrase and think assimilation of cultures/ethnicities/races under the Constitution.

I guess it's supposed to be like a cooking pot with all kinds of foods and seasoning mixed together, or melted together.

And in that case, we're cooking that pot horribly and it is most likely giving everyone the shits.

3
DonuteaterReturns 3 points ago +5 / -2

A melting pot normally contains either cheese or chocolate. You have to put cheese and only cheese in to have a melting pot that works. Or chocolate. But mixing the two is awful and so is adding non meltable ingredients.

You can absolutely have immigration. But it's like free trade, the two countries have to be equal for it to work. Which means Canada, NZ, Australia, the UK ,Europe Japan and South Korea. And even then only in limited numbers. .

2
AmericanJawa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right, the "Melting Pot" is supposed to represent assimilation where people join the culture and add their best elements to it for a stronger singular culture.

By contrast, what we have now is a "Salad Bowl" where we have a bunch of cultures thrown together but they're all still their own distinct cultures that don't hold together and could easily be broken apart again into their own pieces.

1
MickMoss1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except that America was never envisioned by the Founders as a place for sullen hordes to live among European stock.

8
Meddlesom 8 points ago +8 / -0

The smelting of ore IS the melting-pot metaphor. It wasn't racist, it was about people casting aside the shitty parts of their old culture to share in the American dream. It's simply a fact that some cultures are better than others.

2
Krapity 2 points ago +2 / -0

Smelting is done in a crucible. Going through a crucible is difficult, destructive, and painful (if you are not metal), but produces stronger material and removes the impurities. I'm all for a society that puts immigrants through a crucible to purify them of their shit cultures. Get rid of the useless immigrants that are drawn, like moths, to the light emitted by social safety nets and state-sponsered benefits. We have enough internal weakness without importing more of it.

2
3-10 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly, it was about removing the dross of their culture to get something more valuable. But it has to contain basically one type of material, cheese, metal, chocolate. In this metaphor it was Judeo-Christian values. I don't care what race a person is, but I want them to embrace Judeo-Christian values, for all of American values emanate from that core foundation.

1
MickMoss1 1 point ago +4 / -3

Christian values. Not "Judeo-Christian." Judeo values are homosexuality, abortion, child rape, tranny bullshit, usury, and subversion.

1
3-10 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm pretty sure that the OT has a lot more text against all those things. One thing I know is that Jews have a split, There are those religious ones that do not accept any of that (interest isn't unChristian), and there are those secular ones that reject Jewish religious values for a secular theology that looks more like Baal.

0
MickMoss1 0 points ago +1 / -1

The OT, maybe, but Jews don't follow the OT, they follow the Talmud, and the Talmud says there are 6 genders, 2 of which are the trannies we see today. The Talmud says that Jews are free to do whatever they want to gentiles. You can make excuses and talk about "splits" in their communities, but the fact is that no matter what they profess, they all end up working toward the same goal, because even the religious Jews are satanic, by their rejection of the true Messiah.

13
Krapity 13 points ago +13 / -0

You can melt 1 lb of shit into 5 pounds of ice cream and you end up with 6 lbs of shit... so the "melting pot" thing can fuck right off.

2
13FOX 2 points ago +4 / -2

KEK

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
-1
deleted -1 points ago +4 / -5
3
MensRea 3 points ago +5 / -2

The melting pot was for the different White Europeans coming to America, not all the POCs

1
covok48 1 point ago +4 / -3

You say say blacks. You’re allowed to here.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
RandArrow 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nah, melting pot and multicultural are fine, as long as they don't stay that way. Can hardly say America of 1800s was not a melting pot of Germans/Celts/Latins/Indians/Africans etc. But, they mostly integrated.

Continuous melting pot just means getting burned.

16
Liberty49220 [S] 16 points ago +16 / -0

“All my accumulated experiences make me foresee a dark, and even very dark, future for our children and grandchildren. At best, they are heading toward an unsuspected collapse of their quality of life (an implosion); at worst, we are leading them to terrible confrontations (an explosion). Most likely, there will be a combination of the two amid growing confusion.”

13
deleted 13 points ago +15 / -2
12
IWanttotalknow 12 points ago +13 / -1

The logic in the article is mostly correct.

Multicultural societies are LONG and SLOW projects and reasonably require strict immigration controls for a lengthy period of time. You can see in many Western countries that there is successful assimilation, but it's mostly dwarfed but less a range of less successful to completely unsuccessful assimilation.

The issue is not race but ethnicity. People from different civilizations think differently because each civilization has a multitude of unique features. The Russians are different than the Americans. The Thai are different than the Vietnamese. The Spanish are different from the Swedes. We all have a large number of things in common, but it's far from everything.

It's not simply adjusting to some customs and understanding the law works differently. It's a deeper thing than that. It reminds me of that meme of France, Britain, America and Russia: The Frenchman says he will die for love, the Brit says he will die for honor, the American says he will die for freedom and the Russian simply says "I will die." It's a wonderful meme because it compresses a real truth about each of those civilizations that's significantly more than skin deep but most people will recognize. Those things are deeply buried, ethnically speaking. There is history that affected the way those peoples grew as a society that stir them very much. The American might understand why the Frenchman will "Die for love" but it doesn't MOVE the American like it does the Frenchman.

With immigration you often get people who pay just slightly more than the equivalent of lipservice to these important truths of the society they immigrate into. Rather than the liberal fantasy of a comingling of the best of each society, which does happen but not frequently, you instead get a partial assimilation. No in depth understanding, just a sort of "I'll go along and keep doing my own thing." Too much of that, and things start going hay wire. It's why immigration from other Western countries tends to go fairly well: they share many similar roots, but have sort of grown their own way.

In a couple of generations usually much of this is gone. But that can take easily 3 generations, if not four or five. Immigration into the West should be severely curbed right now, immigration has been on the rise for at least two decades if not three and has gone way beyond the ethnicity issues but into the area of "our systems are unable to handle this amount of immigration, SLOW THE HELL DOWN."

The only issue I take with the article is one thing: while it's true that minorities have been big violent winners and majorities have been placid losers: this is true under the previous ordering of things, in modern Liberal order. We are no longer in modernity but in post-modernity - and the Liberal order is crumbling around the world. The new order (if we win, if the globalists win we're all really screwed) is one that will be less Liberal (Liberalism isn't going away, but it will be heavily diminished without a doubt). The focus will be on maintaining society and limiting immigration while working on fixing and rebuilding institutions will actually go a long way towards integration and assimilation and strengthening Western countries. A sort of post-culture war Reconstruction where post-modern post-liberal Liberalism is reigned in and depowered.

7
covok48 7 points ago +8 / -1

The issue is absolutely race. You cannot tell me in 2022 that blacks are fully assimilated even though they’ve lived here for hundreds of years. Nor can you tell me that Indians are assimilating since they are bringing their caste system with them even though it’s been banned worldwide for 150 years. Nor Han Chinese due to there being a “Chinatown” in every major city for a century & our technology seems to magically make its way abroad for “reasons”.

1
AmericanJawa 1 point ago +2 / -1

There was a time where they were assimilated but there's been an active effort to de-assimilate them.

Democrats never got over the loss of their slaves, and even after Blacks were a part of society following the Civil War.

Woodrow Wilson made major strides towards re-segregation, as did FDR and Lyndon Johnson. All of them actively worked towards dividing a united nation.

It's not blacks who are to blame, it's Democrats who insist on pushing a racial-based society.

2
MickMoss1 2 points ago +4 / -2

They were never assimilated. They were better off before their families were destroyed by welfare, but they could never compete in an unsegregated market, which is why they still need affirmative action today. They will always need a helping hand to get by and they will never be grateful for it.

0
AmericanJawa 0 points ago +2 / -2

they could never compete in an unsegregated market, which is why they still need affirmative action today. They will always need a helping hand to get by

These are the same talking points that Democrats use to justify eternal welfare and racist pro-black policies.

1
MickMoss1 1 point ago +3 / -2

Well, I guess the Democrats don't get everything wrong, then.
But they blame socioeconomic reasons rather than genetics, so they're reason is wrong, but the outcome of their reasoning is still correct.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
AmericanJawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your tunnel-vision approach to the issue is far more "NPC" than anything I'm saying.

-1
IWanttotalknow -1 points ago +1 / -2

ok racist.

1
DonuteaterReturns 1 point ago +3 / -2

Ethnicity and race are the same thing. Different groups of people are genetically different and that changes their behavior.

1
IWanttotalknow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ethnicity and race are the same thing.

No they're not. You might be clued into this by the fact that they're different words, with different meanings.

An ethnic group or an ethnicity is a grouping of people who identify with each other on the basis of shared attributes that distinguish them from other groups. Those attributes can include common sets of traditions, ancestry, language, history, society, culture, nation, religion, or social treatment within their residing area.

This is from Wikipedia, but it's also the same as virtually every definition you can find going back at least 50 years. It IS true that most people in an ethnic group share the same race, but certainly not all. Wasn't it like a week or two ago that someone got ROASTED on Twitter for stating that Hitler never used chemical weapons against ethnic Germans? (hint: Many Jews were ethnic Germans, had lived there for generations, shared German traditions, ancestry, language, history, society, cultural, etc.)

Different groups of people are genetically different and that changes their behavior.

If you mean men and women are genetically different and that changes a number of their behaviors, that would be true. So, would you like to tell me what the genetic difference that changes behaviors is between Han Chinese and Ethiopians? And can you do it while not sounding like a National Socialist?

-1
DonuteaterReturns -1 points ago +1 / -2

Sure! Skull shape, average height and high twitch muscle fiber. Obviously skin color too. You can't seriously tell me that you'd mistake a Han Chinese for an Ethiopian just by looking at them.

Why do they have these traits? Evolution and environment. They have different genes because China and Ethiopia are different places. Different genes are selected for. Basic darwinism.

Now are you trying to tell me that this selective pressure over thousands of years that caused very obvious genetic differences did not include the brain? Even though the skull shape is different? Evolution just stops at the neck for some arbitrary reason?

Does that make a group lesser? No. Both countries have a unique culture that should be valued. And everyone deserves the same human rights and equal treatment under the law. But if you bring 100 million Chinese to Ethiopia then in a few decades Ethiopia will be gone, both genetically and culturally. And a bunch of Chinese playing dress up is not the same as Ethiopia. You can't have Ethiopia without the people that created it- the Ethiopian people.

I am not racist. I simply hold people to standards. If a race fails those standards it is not racism, but simple genetic difference. Think of it like a roller coaster. You have to be a certain height to ride because the rollercoaster can't safely hold small people. The current version of multiculturalism ignores genetic differences and pretends we're all the same. That's like putting an age limit on the roller coaster instead of a height limit. Now people who are too short can ride it, fall off and die all because you didn't want to admit the uncomfortable truth that not everyone is the same.

0
IWanttotalknow 0 points ago +1 / -1

Stormfag lol.

-1
DonuteaterReturns -1 points ago +1 / -2

That's all? No clever response? This place really is turning into reddit.

0
MensRea 0 points ago +1 / -1

No, I am of mixed ethnicity (Italian, Welsh, Scottish, and English) but of the White race.

9
RecycledElectrons 9 points ago +10 / -1

Multicultural societies end with the death of one race or the other.

The majority decides which one dies.

What will white Americans decide?

13
cbone87 13 points ago +13 / -0

Whites would rather die than be called racists.

7
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 7 points ago +7 / -0

From the article: "it happens that minorities are violent winners, and majorities placid losers.”

1
covok48 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be cucked and genocide themselves.

6
smartass 6 points ago +6 / -0

Of course. We need leaders who will de-multicultify the west.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
Leb99 2 points ago +4 / -2

Correct, this is just how usa are born. The native american were utterly destroyed

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
covok48 2 points ago +2 / -0

Look at the UK getting reverse colonized.

4
VenusDe 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Diversity" isn't strength. It simply normalizes terrorism.

4
Somefucktard 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is it all just genocide by ̶a̶l̶t̶e̶r̶n̶a̶t̶i̶v̶e̶ progressive methods?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +7 / -2
0
AmericanJawa 0 points ago +1 / -1

Blame Democrats for preventing said assimilation. Look to Wilson, look to FDR, look to Lyndon Johnson and you'll see where the problem is.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
AmericanJawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stop being ignorant of history.

2
YouNeedVPN 2 points ago +3 / -1

The plan was repatriation. But Booth put an end to that.

2
MickMoss1 2 points ago +2 / -0

3 cultures. Everyone forgets about the Jew involvement in creating that conflict. That's just how they like it.

3
Ricky_CIA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Diversity is corrosive and toxic.

2
Snoman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Another failure of the “rules based order” system the academics sell each other.

Don’t be fooled though, these types exist on both sides of the aisle.

1
covok48 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. The amount of simping here for minorities is nauseating.

2
SteelDriver 2 points ago +2 / -0

So they're admitting now, that the leftists running the world the last few decades really aren't any smarter than everyone else in the history of civilization. Multiculturalism has failed everywhere it has been attempted, short of subjugation of minority cultures.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
TheImpossible1 2 points ago +4 / -2

We're not buying your race war propaganda.

Part of the More Feminine Way?

"Build Back Better, More Feminine" - Boris Johnson.

Who told us whites have privilege? A women's organization.

Who created BLM? A lesbian woman.

They divide us because we could easily win if we united, even if just as a voting bloc.

2
covfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

When I was a kid I was told that America was a melting pot. When was the last time you heard that?

4
AlphabetAgencyFags 4 points ago +5 / -1

Same here. Melting pot was a dumb metaphor, but mostly implied that you gave up your culture to be a part of the larger culture here. That is no longer a requirement. Now you could be a piece of shit from whatever toilet you came from be proud of it and tell everyone here to go fuck themselves and then everyone here has to like that and respect your stupid toilet culture

2
covok48 2 points ago +2 / -0

Last I heard was 2013. Then in 2014 Ferguson happened. At that point it’s clear that blacks will never assimilate.

1
AmericanJawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's devolved from a Melting Pot to a Salad Bowl.

0
ragnarokrobo 0 points ago +1 / -1

From people just as deluded as the ones saying diversity is our strength.

2
Krapity 2 points ago +3 / -1

"bu..bu..buht muh dIvErSitY iS mUh StrEnGth!!!!!"

2
unspecified_user 2 points ago +2 / -0

This has been well known for 50 years.

This fact is the basis of the Coudenhove-Kalergi plan, of Agenda 21, of Agenda 2030, Bilderberg, WEF, etc

2
MyPCBecameSelfAware 2 points ago +2 / -0

Diversity is not any society's strength, and never has been. Diversity, especially forced, is the root cause of the destruction of every society in history. The diversity pushed upon white nations (ONLY!) is on purpose and is meant to destabilize and destroy the creators and maintainers of western civilization. This image from my city summarizes this perfectly: https://www.thepoliticalcesspool.org/jamesedwards/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/cville.jpg

2
TheMadManDidItAgain 2 points ago +2 / -0

This country was designed with the idea of "we'll leave you the fuck alone if you leave us the fuck alone... but let's all agree on a few things."

And it worked really well for 150 years until the progressive / Marxist infiltration started to happen, slowly eroding away our society. Then, we have the 24/7 news cycle. The final nail in the coffin was when Obama repealed the propaganda ban (Smith-Mundt Act) in 2013 which essentially made it legal for government agencies to spread propaganda through the media without retribution.

Now, we have systemic propaganda, legalized, and protected.

2
BunnyPicnic 2 points ago +4 / -2

There are decent, honest, hard working people from all cultures. But every really pisses me off is this notion that Americans, especially white Americans, don't get to celebrate our culture. Blacks say we lack culture and our food is bland. Fried chicken isn't a black creation. They took that from their masters.

I don't care what you are, as long as you are an American, a real patriotic American. Some of the biggest patriots and Trump supporters I know, came here from Mexico. It's more about class anymore. They try to divide us with race and shit, but it doesn't work anymore.

3
covok48 3 points ago +4 / -1

Whites conquered three quarters of the world looking for spices. There are no American patriotic races other than whites. Gets blacks in a group of 4 of more and tell me how American and patriotic they are. Better yet, ask the same to a black-majority area.

-1
BunnyPicnic -1 points ago +1 / -2

Nah, if you haven't met any based blacks or Hispanics, you don't know enough of them. At one point in our history, Italians weren't considered white, but they didn't stick with the democrat agenda. You don't think Thomas Sowell is a Patriot? Clarence Thomas? Fredrick Douglas? Come on, it's only a certain welfare culture of people you're talking about, but it also just happens that blacks are more likely to fall into that culture. Their culture comes from the white plantation owners.

1
covok48 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whites have their own strata that exists as immigrants. Whites from western, northern and central Europe settled America & Canada. Whites from Iberia, Italy, and the Balkans settled in Latin America. Guess how that turned out?

I think you naming the only black right wing celebrities over a 150 year span while telling me I don’t know enough “based” minorities isn’t exactly convincing.

1
ed_shaw 1 point ago +1 / -0

Mexicans and American-Indo-Europeans share a common Causasian ancestry and cultural origin.

2
Meddlesom 2 points ago +2 / -0

'member when the left would also talk about the most successful "socialist" countries and every single time they would point out the little Northern European countries that had a completely homogeneous society of people with a shared culture and ancestry? Those same countries are turning to shit these days because they're multiculturalisming themselves to death by importing orcs and muslims.

We're witnessing the total collapse of ALL Western civilization. All so that a few ancient families can control what's left of the world after they're done destroying it.

1
Markstrosity 1 point ago +1 / -0

Soon these people will be called anti-semetic.

1
Stanwyk74 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's easy math. They're already calling black people Frenchmen, Germans, Swiss, British, Irish...

1
Abovethefray 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is why Israel won't allow it there.

Japan seems smart, also.

1
immortal 1 point ago +1 / -0

emasculated liars

1
D3PL0R4BL3 1 point ago +1 / -0

A society is lost once more than around 5% or more are Muslim. They worship death and violence.

1
bill_in_texas 1 point ago +1 / -0

In other breaking news, water is wet.

1
Boinger1988 1 point ago +1 / -0

great article... ZeroHedge has been doing some great work. i completely agree with the article and i hope Zemmour gets elected. I hope France doesn't use Dominion

1
DottersDiary 1 point ago +1 / -0

“All ‘multicultural’ societies are doomed to more or less deep rifts,” is the actual quote. Zero hedge pulling some bullshit.

1
Dirkstruan313 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is always a dawn

1
defiant_liberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you never been to chinatown? The problem isn't multicultural societies fighting, that is the symptom when tons of people start to leech of of taxpayer funded programs that shouldn't exist.

1
Endprism 1 point ago +2 / -1

Multiculturalism is not always a good thing when everyone fights with each other

6
ragnarokrobo 6 points ago +6 / -0

It is never a good thing.

3
covok48 3 points ago +3 / -0

Never a good thing. Time to deprogram yourself.

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
0
unicornpoop 0 points ago +1 / -1

No, this is false. Their holy book says to destroy their "enemies." Any group who competes or threatens their power. The ultimate goal is to rule the lesser humans like managed livestock.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
SaltyBobCat 0 points ago +1 / -1

Even yours.

0
BroadSunlitUplands 0 points ago +1 / -1

Call it what it is: divided-culturalism

0
Dallasguy 0 points ago +3 / -3

That’s clearly untrue, as Americans thrive as a people despite no ethnic or racial underpinning to keep us loyal to each other. Look at any Trump rally and you’ll see that our love of 45 and the USA is our bond.

It’s the concept of multiculturalism that has driven a wedge between people.

3
AlphabetAgencyFags 3 points ago +3 / -0

Go to any major city like LA or New York and you’ll see entire communities of people, such as the Muslim desert people , Who specifically came here for the Gibbs and literally hate this place. Sadly there’s many such examples

2
Dallasguy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wasn’t always like that. The fact that people who hate America are trying to wreck it doesn’t mean America doesn’t work. France let in millions of people who hate their country.

My uncle had to hide from Japanese soldiers when he was a little kid. He taught himself English from comic books, became an Eagle Scout and a surgeon because he wanted to be an American citizen. His culture is nothing like ours. He read the requirements, followed the rules, and was buried with full military honors as a retired US army colonel.

Different cultures are fine as long as everyone believes in the melting pot.

2
Grond999 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are no true multicultural societies, because a true multicultural society would have to have multiple cultural concurrent systems of law, punishment, medicine and more. Malaysia has a partial dual law system for muslims vs non-muslims.

1
covok48 1 point ago +1 / -0

The rallies are 99% white.

1
Dallasguy 1 point ago +1 / -0

White is not a culture. And if you see someone who isn’t “white” who shares your values, that barrier drops quickly.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
-1
Dallasguy -1 points ago +2 / -3

So the concept of the American melting pot is globalist to you? The concept that made America the greatest country in the world before the globalists fucked it all up.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-2
Hendrixdan57 -2 points ago +1 / -3

Bunch of race obsessed faggots in this thread. White is not a race ya fucking dipshits its a lack of melanin you are all from different cultures your ancestors shit you out in the U.S. soil and you fucking inbred. Fucking tribalistic fucking retards.

2
Dirkstruan313 2 points ago +3 / -1

Found the elf

1
ed_shaw 1 point ago +1 / -0

You sound like a real genius. According to anthropologists, species Homo Sapien fall into three distinct "races." white (Caucasian) black (Negroid) and yellow (Mongoloid.) The "colors" are usually considered folk or popular terminology.

1
Hendrixdan57 1 point ago +1 / -0

The anthropology studies you are refering too were from before the discovery of the human genome. Why dont you go read something from the 20th century. Maybe start with professor C Loring Brace who discredits your entire premise using basic biology. Once again race obsessed faggots

1
ed_shaw 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm sure there is plenty of literature out there to support your anti-Western, hatred of the white man, position. As I say, skin color is just a tiny consideration. Much of the self hatred stems from a sophisticated Marxist philosophy known as
Post-Modernism. The viewpoint is shared by the violent separatists who collect under the religion Black Muslims.

1
Hendrixdan57 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dog shit point of view based on mass generalizations of humans with different melanin and philosophy. Im American. My ethnicity is "white". In my opinion being proud of a skin color is a fucking retarded premise. You dont see people running around bragging about hair color or eye color. Only stupid fucks who engage in tribalism brag about shit like that. Simple minded fools.

1
ed_shaw 1 point ago +1 / -0

You must run into a lot of them, out there.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
4
Deplorable_Yankee 4 points ago +4 / -0

All fine points but what is ACTUALLY happening currently? Millions of people have entered illegally and utilize our very generous system. 3rd worlders imported here with zero intention of assimilation. Meanwhile, our tax money assists these people.

4
TommyJarvis 4 points ago +4 / -0

Those 3rd worlders, btw, are the perpetual poor and worthless that their home countries are pleased to get rid of.

1
unicornpoop 1 point ago +1 / -0

We should return the favor.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Deplorable_Yankee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gotcha