They’re starting to make mistakes (media.patriots.win) 😷  MIDTERM  VARIANT  😷
posted ago by RobHatmaker ago by RobHatmaker +1352 / -4
Comments (68)
sorted by:
instant_covfefe 44 points ago +51 / -7

The MSM was talking about it as early as December 22nd, 2020 and has mentioned it 1952 times since then.


slickfiddy 14 points ago +17 / -3

Great source, thank you fren.

Brucesky420 20 points ago +25 / -5

Not a great source at all, the beta variant was known as the south african variant. So all the discussion you see about the south african variant was referring to beta

This source is actually incredibly misleading and so is the post. I'm not saying you can or should trust WHO, but their site says nothing about Omicron in July, feel free to check the OPs link for yourself. Once again, I'm incredibly disappointed in how much misinformation we let spread around here. Stay on your toes folks, just because it's something you want to believe doesn't mean it's true

Spreading bullshit like this doesn't help our cause whatsoever. It just gives people another example to point to and say "see they're always lying, so don't believe anything else they say"

TippyTop1987 9 points ago +9 / -0

Sorry sir but you seem to be incorrect.


This is the WEF talking about the South Africa variant back in July of 2021 and it names the variant by its ID, B.1.1.529

So while their may be other variants out of SA it is indisputable that this ‘new’ variant is now new.

You may feel an impulse to point out the recently added ‘This article has been updated’ nonsense but then please provide an answer as to why they would update some random article from 07/2021. Why not create a completely new article? Makes no sense. At least you can try to claim honestly that at best this is a strategy to discredit but even then it doesn’t matter as once again they can just claim a variant to be whatever they want. Is it not odd that the beta out of SA shares the exact uniqueness with the supposed Omicron variant?

bantar 7 points ago +7 / -0

This article did NOT mention B.1.1.529 in July. It was updated in November to add this item. Internet Archive of the July article was devoid of B.1.1.529.

See here: https://archive.md/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/07/how-scientists-detect-new-covid-19-variants/

The updated articles that came afterwards still have the July date. Once this was made public, they went back and added a disclaimer that this was added in November.

DickTick 4 points ago +4 / -0

God damn you beat me to it by second lol


I don't know why someone would put that much effort into catching someone on some shit like that, but not take the 5 seconds it takes to verify it.....

FrostedCricketFlakes 6 points ago +6 / -0

https://archive.ph/HjZ0j This was the article in July. There was no mention of B.1.1.529 at that time.

Mooksayshigh 3 points ago +4 / -1

It says right on there “this article was last updated Nov 26.”

The original article was written in July with edits in September and November.

DickTick 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sorry sir, but you're actually the one that's incorrect.

Internet archives and the wayback machine are your friend...

Here is a page capture, of that actual page, back in July and it has none of that new information on it, obviously.........


Drainthecommies 2 points ago +2 / -0

You absolutely not trust the WHO with any information. They claimed that there was no evidence of covid-19 person to person.

slickfiddy 2 points ago +4 / -2

Thanks for the correction pede.

Tyrone_biggums 1 point ago +1 / -0

This “variant” was discovered in July.


This is the same one referred to in the last few days’ coverage, eg by the BBC:


It is called B.1.1.529. What’s new and may be confusing to you is the “omicron” designator

instant_covfefe 8 points ago +9 / -1

Here's how to download the videos, #6 in the comment: https://patriots.win/p/12jcvQRRjs/x/c/4JBwmVnlW43

Snoman 27 points ago +28 / -1

Why is the WEF reporting on virus variants, seems out of their lane

RobHatmaker [S] 26 points ago +29 / -3

No one is in their lane at this point.

Donttreadonme16 13 points ago +13 / -0

Particularly Bill Gates

rossiFan 4 points ago +4 / -0

There are no lanes.

fac1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where they're going they don't need lanes.

deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
DickTick 1 point ago +1 / -0

While that is still good information, this post is completely incorrect. The article has been updated and had none of that variant-specific information back in July


Skogin 10 points ago +10 / -0

Because they are the ring leaders orchestrating the Plandemic ➡️ The Gay Reset.

DickTick 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe, but it certainly isn't because of shit like this variant being "reannounced"......

Same page, captured back in July


Says nothing about the new variant

FrostedCricketFlakes 2 points ago +2 / -0

The founder wrote a book called Covid 19: The Great Reset. They're using this to achieve their long term goals.

Buck_Fiden 2 points ago +2 / -0

The first to read the script is always the script writers.

FromTheThirdEstate 22 points ago +24 / -2

This is BS. Here is the archived July version of the page: https://archive.md/HjZ0j

It doesn't say anything about the "omicron" or "B.1.1.529" variant.

Mooksayshigh 0 points ago +1 / -1

And the first paragraph explains why…

Kamalas_a_Bitch 3 points ago +5 / -2

Yes this post was deBoonked in another thread:


DoMe22 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you for sauce.

Groundpounder 7 points ago +8 / -1

Can’t you hear Fauci explaining this on CNN? “The variant has access to miniature time machines that can bypass the space/time continuum…blah blah, but most importantly, PANIC and OBEY!”

Marshall2 3 points ago +3 / -0

BTW, I patented this before it existed by a short trip in this Time Machine.

Canadian4Freedom 5 points ago +6 / -1

They've been "making mistakes" for a long time. Brexit was a huge blow to those assholes, and electing people like Trump sent them over the edge of sanity watching their hundred-year plan crumble like so much dry dog crap.

Sips Coffee

We need to accelerate their downfall further to prevent further harm to everyone and discuss a new method of self-governance that prevents this in the future.

deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
17pat76 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fuck off with your ridiculous variant bullshit. Didn’t care about the 1st one, didn’t care about the 2nd or 3rd, don’t give a shit about this nonsense

Longhairedzombie 3 points ago +3 / -0

Covid is the cold.....long time ago they said they cannot make a vaccine for the cold cause it has too many variants....covid and the many variants.....

mojorisen 3 points ago +5 / -2

As long as the media cover for them, mistakes like this really don't matter.

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
Danny1878 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not a mistake, it's just a flat out lie.

J_Doe 2 points ago +2 / -0

The wef page mentions at the top that the article was updated on 26 November 2021. However, it doesn't mention what was updated.

Bax101 1 point ago +1 / -0

Won't matter. The media will still report to the masses. Not enough people use Twitter to find such info

Dialectic 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Starting” to lmao.

Heckles 1 point ago +1 / -0


YodaBannon 1 point ago +1 / -0


Buck_Fiden 1 point ago +1 / -0

The World Economic Forum is always several months ahead of the agenda.

scoobydoobydoo 1 point ago +1 / -0

The codes are assigned to every discovered mutation, the Greek letters are the “variants of concern”, i.e. the usually-milder ones that survive and spread.

TDAF 1 point ago +1 / -0

"The next variant won't be ready in time for the midterms. Let's just use Omicron since it's already up and running."

YouNeedVPN 1 point ago +1 / -0

The useless eaters don't care.

Majinadd 1 point ago +1 / -0

11 / 24 / 21 is devil coding they are just trolling you. straight shit post that go over peoples heads.

this coding is the mark of the beast. 11 / 6 / 3 3 6 = 3 666

wake up, why they make such a huge obvious lie so u spread there trolling satan shit laughin there asses at us.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
sustainable_saltmine 1 point ago +1 / -0

Still waiting to hear how they "identify variants". They can't even isolate core covid and tell it apart from flu or the cold

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
hillaryforprison 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought "Omnicron" was a joke. They're really calling covid-19 that now, huh? Why not just call it decepticon?

DickTick 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are naming the variants similar to naming hurricanes only they randomly skip some so as not to upset their dear leader in China.

Every time a new variant has been isolated, it will get a new name

And it's retarded not to believe in variants....... because that simply how viruses work . Its the same reason that they have to make a new flu shot every year because the one they made last year may or may not work for whatever the most prominent variant is in the next season....

Viruses mutate..... that is what they do and have been doing for billions of years before all this covid-19 bullshit over the last 2 years......

We've also known since they released the vaccines that they were literally going to turn themselves into variant making factories and, even worse, variant making factories that help viruses mutate for more favorable traits, as opposed to the randomly rolling the dice that a virus normally has to do on its own....

Not only will we get new variants, but it's very likely that we will eventually get one that is completely immune to their vaccines and our antibodies.....

The term isn't "vaccine resistant", It's "Antibody resistant"......... And that's one of the main traits that the vaccinated's new mutation-friendly-bodies are helping the virus to achieve....... So these faggots could very well end up fucking all of us before it's over with....

labiator 0 points ago +1 / -1

Omikron. As in the Greek alphabet letter. They gave Xi the swerve.

ItsOkayToBeWight 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is hardly a gotcha. It's entirely possible that the variant was contained for months before some event allowed it to spread further. Of course, it's also possible that the WHO/WEF are full of shit. But I wouldn't lean on this bit too hard.

deleted -1 points ago +0 / -1