Comments (3)
sorted by:
Tomm 2 points ago +2 / -0

Go to They might have better theories than this board.

muslimporn [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

It's not really the appropriate place. They take Q seriously. I don't want to go straight in with something they'll automatically dismiss on face value saying Q is a sham.

If we can get proof then it's different but there's enormous circumstantial evidence for him being Q.

I matched this guy to Q using only data from mid 2016 or older and Q's posts.

Then when I looked into him further he works in military intelligence, specifically propaganda, he explicitly advocates lying and infiltration, working in things like counter insurgency, is pro-intervention, pro-NATO and to top it off he released a paper on pol in 2020 around the time Q disappeared.

I really think he's potentially behind Q.

Jimmy33 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gina is Q