22
Comments (21)
sorted by:
4
luckyfunk13 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just add MSNBC.com, CNN.com, etc. to your hosts file with 127.0.0.1

1
ethan123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pihole -> add sites to blacklist

-2
contribulation -2 points ago +2 / -4

I don't want my personal workstation associated in ANY WAY with that ABSOLUTE HOT TRASH.

Fuck you and fuck your suggestion.

8
gamexa 8 points ago +8 / -0

You can use 0.0.0.0 if it’s better for your blood pressure, chief.

3
luckyfunk13 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe he is railing on IP4?

Apologies, point them to ::1

3
contribulation 3 points ago +3 / -0

AI and image recognition could do it.

Plugin sends all images (or their URLs) to a service that scores it as propaganda.

Hmm this could have lots of uses....

3
laspojd2 [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

You could have a global list similar how uBlock or Dark reader does it. Look at how extensions blocking Google Doodles works

1
Eric42 1 point ago +1 / -0

You could use a profanity filter. I don't think it works with pictures though.

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/advanced-profanity-filter/piajkpdbaniagacofgklljacgjhefjeh

0
yeldarb1983 0 points ago +3 / -3

Theoretically possible, but not worth the hassle. Just treat it like the stripe on a skunk's tail and steer clear. Eventually, the winds of politics will change, and we'll be back to corporations pandering to the obnoxious pricks on the right side of the aisle, rather than the ones on the left.

Give it ten, maybe twenty years, thirty tops.

3
contribulation 3 points ago +3 / -0

You think it will happen within 30 years?

Love the optimism; it's high energy.

2
bootsy_two_scoops 2 points ago +2 / -0

Totally. Reagan was elected 16 years after Barry Goldwater ran. Trump is the next Goldwater, with 100 times higher energy, and information and ideas move 10 times faster than they did then.

2
yeldarb1983 2 points ago +3 / -1

contribulation Love the optimism; it's high energy.

Nah, it's not optimism, it's pattern recognition.

30 years ago, evangelicals and assorted other rightwing moralists were railing against gay marriage, rap and rock music, and other "ills" of society using more or less the same arguments of "protecting" society that their counterparts on the left, and in some amusingly ironic examples, the exact same people, use today, only instead of hammering us over the head with cherry-picked biblical quotes and interpretations, they cherry-pick "science" and "secular" moralism to make their case for "benevolently" ruling us with an iron fist, the same way bible-thumpers did in the 80s and 90s.

10-20 years before that, the "peaceful" hippies had the ears of the public who happily swilled this same gabarge pile from the left as the right after them and the left today fed them.

sixty years from now, we'll be right back here, waiting for the tide to turn once again.

Whoever said "the only constant is change" wasn't kidding.

5
krzyzowiec 5 points ago +5 / -0

Except the religious right was correct lol. Too bad they failed to protect society and their predictions came true.

-2
yeldarb1983 -2 points ago +2 / -4

Were they, though? They were every big a hypocrites then as they are now. How many Black Americans were left fatherless and blaming the Right in the name of "the War on Drugs," because daddy got caught next to a guy who was holding an ounce?

How many evangelicals and "born again" politicians were caught shacking up with mistresses and boyfriends while denouncing the evils of homosexuality and pre-marital sex? "Rules for thee, but not for me." as the saying goes.

And my personal favorite; how many formerly right-leaning Democrats sweat bullets every time someone brings up their old position on imprisonment, DOMA, or any of a number of now unfavorable positions?

It's not the left or the right you have to worry about; it's the fringes and the people who want to rule you and be ruled by someone else.

5
krzyzowiec 5 points ago +6 / -1

Why was daddy next to the guy holding an ounce? If he was decent, he wouldn't associate with loser druggies.

How many evangelicals and "born again" politicians were caught shacking up with mistresses and boyfriends while denouncing the evils of homosexuality and pre-marital sex? "Rules for thee, but not for me." as the saying goes.

Some of them were hypocrites, sure, that doesn't change the fact that the actions they criticized were indeed degenerate and are leading to our destruction right now. You don't throw out the good rules just because some of the people who supported them didn't live up to the high standards they claimed.

It's not the left or the right you have to worry about; it's the fringes and the people who want to rule you and be ruled by someone else.

Left/Right is just a euphemism for Evil/Good. It's a shame that Republicans don't respect or abide by their own platform anymore, but the Democrats openly support evil so...

I'm a Christian first. Don't really care about political distinctions. Society was far better off when degenerates were shamed into hiding rather than openly parading themselves down the street. Now instead of being hypocrites, politicians line up to praise homosexuals for their "bravery", and US embassies are literally flying their gay flags.

0
yeldarb1983 0 points ago +2 / -2

Why was daddy next to the guy holding an ounce? If he was decent, he wouldn't associate with loser druggies.

"Why was daddy next to that Andy Ngo guy? If he was decent, he wouldn't associate with NAZIs."

"Why was daddy carrying an AR-15? If he was decent, he wouldn't have a big, sssskkcAAAaweeey gun."

A better question is why is it any of the government's business what you put in your body, what kind of firearm you carry, or who you associate with? You can hate the person, the substance, or the weapon, but so long as they're minding their own business, the government shouldn't be arresting them or you.

Some of them were hypocrites, sure, that doesn't change the fact that the actions they criticized were indeed degenerate and are leading to our destruction right now. You don't throw out the good rules just because some of the people who supported them didn't live up to the high standards they claimed.

Yet the loudest voices against both were often those most guilty of it, in the same way you'll find dozens of racists and antisemites among the supposedly anti-racist left. But again, we come back to personal liberty. How is what you or I or any other consenting adult for that matter does with other consenting adults a matter for the law? Call it out if you disagree with it, sure, but you can't legislate morality, and being a degenerate is no reason to abuse a person or deprive them of their rights. "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" "personal privacy" "the right to defend oneself" "the right to keep and bear arms" "freedom of speech, and of the press, and of religion, and of the People to peaceably assemble and to petition their government for a redress of grievances." I wholeheartedly embrace all of these, and many more that I wont list for the sake of some semblance of brevity as I'm sure you do as well, but the extremes of both sides would deprive us all of all of these if they had the opportunity.

Left/Right is just a euphemism for Evil/Good. It's a shame that Republicans don't respect or abide by their own platform anymore, but the Democrats openly support evil so...

I've had leftists on twitter make this exact argument about people like you and me on twitter. You think they're evil, they think you and those who think like you are evil. I think (with a few exceptions) both sides are wrong. It's not evil, it's just a different point of view.

And let's be real, there's little difference between Democrats and Republican at this point, nothing but a bunch of theater to keep anyone actually worth a shit from getting into office. You gotta look at individual politicians if you wanna make any real, lasting change.

I'm a Christian first. Don't really care about political distinctions. Society was far better off when degenerates were shamed into hiding rather than openly parading themselves down the street. Now instead of being hypocrites, politicians line up to praise homosexuals for their "bravery", and US embassies are literally flying their gay flags.

And Jesus ministered to degenerates, criminals, and idolaters. He said that God is love, and that if someone wasn't against you, they were with you. He spoke against conversion by the sword, and he gave to Caesar what was Caesar's, but what was God's, he gave to God. He said to judge fairly as the judgement given to you will be just as harsh as what you give to others. He condemned those who turned the temple into a den of thieves. I imagine the likes of Pat Robertson and Kenneth Copeland would have caught his whip on their hides more than once.

You can disagree with what someone does, but are you better than Jesus, that you can't minister to them with the love, patience, and understanding of the One Most High?

I hope you understand, I don't hate you. Much like the leftists I used to argue with on Twitter before I was banned, I disagree with you, but I think you need to look at things from a broader, more understanding perspective, just as they need to.

3
krzyzowiec 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Why was daddy next to that Andy Ngo guy? If he was decent, he wouldn't associate with NAZIs."

"Why was daddy carrying an AR-15? If he was decent, he wouldn't have a big, sssskkcAAAaweeey gun."

So because crazy people make crazy connections, we can't make any judgments at all? Is that what you're saying? Like if someone is working for MS-13, we can't say there's something wrong with that person morally, because crazy people will say the same thing about us and some fictitious nazis?

A better question is why is it any of the government's business what you put in your body, what kind of firearm you carry, or who you associate with? You can hate the person, the substance, or the weapon, but so long as they're minding their own business, the government shouldn't be arresting them or you.

Yeah so how's legalization of marijuana working out for Colorado? It's pothead capital now. People are out of their minds over there, but I guess they have freedom so that is great? Let's legalize heroine and cocaine too, to improve their lives even further lol. Sorry but these drugs are not good and healthy for you. Making a comparison to guns doesn't even make sense. We're talking about impairment here.

Call it out if you disagree with it, sure, but you can't legislate morality

People who reject God and morality will do so either way, but the purpose of the law is to enforce a standard of conduct for people who have no self control.

being a degenerate is no reason to abuse a person or deprive them of their rights.

I'm more concerned about the health of children than I am about freedom for degenerates to be disgusting. If they want to do disgusting things in private in their own home then great for them, but we should protect children from seeing that in public. Or do you believe we should allow people to run around naked in public also? Expose themselves and have sex in front of children? I mean it's their right and freedom to do what they want with their bodies...

I've had leftists on twitter make this exact argument about people like you and me on twitter. You think they're evil, they think you and those who think like you are evil. I think (with a few exceptions) both sides are wrong. It's not evil, it's just a different point of view.

Moral relativism leads to the destruction of society. Of course they will call us evil. They know the power of the moral argument even if they don't know anything about what is actually good. If you think it's just a difference in a point of view, then why do their policies lead to decay and destruction of their cities? Mental illness in their population?

And Jesus ministered to degenerates, criminals, and idolaters. He said that God is love, and that if someone wasn't against you, they were with you. He spoke against conversion by the sword, and he gave to Caesar what was Caesar's, but what was God's, he gave to God. He said to judge fairly as the judgement given to you will be just as harsh as what you give to others. He condemned those who turned the temple into a den of thieves. I imagine the likes of Pat Robertson and Kenneth Copeland would have caught his whip on their hides more than once.

You can disagree with what someone does, but are you better than Jesus, that you can't minister to them with the love, patience, and understanding of the One Most High?

I hope you understand, I don't hate you. Much like the leftists I used to argue with on Twitter before I was banned, I disagree with you, but I think you need to look at things from a broader, more understanding perspective, just as they need to.

I'm not judging anyone. I understand their point of view, they're just wrong.

Love is not weakness or acceptance of evil. Jesus spoke the truth. He shamed those who did wrong. I'm not expecting or wanting to force anyone to be like me or be a Christian, but I absolutely will not allow degenerates and pedophiles free reign in my society. They should repent and return to God, and if they are not willing to do that, then keep it to themselves out of shame and fear. The alternative is to allow them into the mainstream to corrupt and destroy innocent children, as is happening now. Liberalism has failed and turned us into a totally degenerate and disgusting society. You don't see it now, but I used to think like you so I know where you are coming from. Then I found God and realized I didn't really know anything about freedom or morality. What you are promoting ends up the same way every single time it is tried.