24
Comments (15)
sorted by:
12
Hoot 12 points ago +12 / -0

Remember when Bush was accused of listening to a known terrorist’s phone calls - like six of them - and everyone went apeshit? I miss that country.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
CoolAsACucumber 2 points ago +2 / -0

What alternatives would you suggest?

2
Jemmy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cyph

2
CoolAsACucumber 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm looking into that, haven't heard of them before

2
Ched 2 points ago +3 / -1

No need to worry about Signal and WhatsApp, that's already being done.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
5
1A2A 5 points ago +5 / -0

Shooting blanks as of now. People are upset the ACLU helped to represent them, ACLU is pure commie trash but commies like their conversations to be private as much as we do.

2
ChickenInspector 2 points ago +2 / -0

The ACLU and commies are more interested in making sure only THEY get privacy and representation.

2
1A2A 2 points ago +2 / -0

So you're saying they have a private version of Signal? One not available to the masses?

4
ChickenInspector 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh, no, I was responding to the "commies like their private communications" part. Apple wouldn't give the feds access to an Islamic terrorists phone but IIRC they would easily do so for one of the January 6 people.

That, and they don't get warantless searches into their conversations either.

Either way, people should look into asymmetric key encryption. Could just exchange encrypted emails and not have the NSA able to look into it (assuming they haven't broken the top encryption methods)

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MakeAmericaGreat9 1 point ago +1 / -0

I used a Google voice number.

2
DC-SNIPEHUNT 2 points ago +2 / -0

Senile bastard is getting Telegram confused with Telegram. He thinks he can just read all the dots and dashes.