Comments (9)
sorted by:
tuchodi -7 points ago +1 / -8

hospital stats

Today's stats can be looked up by anyone. When you look at them you'll see that about 21% of the people in those hospitals and ICUs are coming from the 10% of the population that is unvaccinated.


Careful. I wouldn't rely on anything our friend V&C1 says. They're pretty confused.

CanadianRighty [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just want the evidence of the estimated effectiveness of the mandates.

I don’t believe for a split second they have saved one life (even if they had I still oppose them)

Without evidence it seems obvious the ban at best s based on a guess, and more likely political.

You don’t get to subvert human rights based on guesses and political calculations.

Until I see evidence otherwise, your lack of providing it will be taken as an admission it does not exist.

tuchodi -7 points ago +1 / -8

You can't even link to the ban, let alone that Canada is the only country doing it. I don't think you know what you're talking about.

CanadianRighty [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are you too stupid to know about the travel ban?

tuchodi -7 points ago +1 / -8

You haven't provided it.

CanadianRighty [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Since you're unaware of the Liberal travel ban, and you're incapable of using google, here it is.

tuchodi -6 points ago +1 / -7

Thank you.

"If you’re 12 years of age plus 4 months, or older, you’ll need to be fully vaccinated in order to board:"

So children under 12 years 4 months can travel regardless. You never mentioned that - it was all about "apartheid against children" and "segregation of unvaccinated children"

Depending on where you are in Canada "children" stop being children at 16, 18, or 19.

So do you have children that can't travel, or something? Seems odd to concentrate so specifically and so much on the range from 12y 4m to 16-19.

CanadianRighty [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

What about the 12 year olds at 0% risk of death?