Comments (51)
sorted by:
SparkMandrill83 30 points ago +30 / -0

How many of them are fat?

MargarineMongoose 10 points ago +10 / -0

Asking the relevant questions right here.

APDSmith 30 points ago +30 / -0

I'm not sure it's wise to have conversations about natural predators when the newspaper stories on schoolteachers abusing their pupils are right there

fellowwhites 29 points ago +30 / -1

No one’s forcing her to burn coal.

dekachin 28 points ago +28 / -0

She doesn't HAVE to date black men.

deleted 9 points ago +10 / -1
elleand202 10 points ago +10 / -0

Isn't political lesbianism more prevalent than political coal burning?

Adamrises 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lesbianism brings about the same level of commitment to your beliefs as does going to church. Both is the answer.

deleted 26 points ago +26 / -0
elleand202 20 points ago +20 / -0

Modern people are so divorced from nature that she can't even comprehend how her life would be like, that is, “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short.”

Tourgen 13 points ago +13 / -0

it's so perverse that women are so resentful and so easily gaslit that they believe their protectors and providers are actually their predators.

men still protect and provide for all women. women just arranged SIMPs and white knights to force us to do it at gunpoint via the government, so that they are not required to submit to the authority of any one man. they force all to submit to a feminist government.

BigDaddyDangler4 2 points ago +2 / -0

See, this is a measured take, unlike Imp's typical reeee-post on women.

TheRealLiszt 6 points ago +6 / -0

I wish for a week, or even a day, when men decide to abandon their 'traditional' rolls and just let nature take its course. No police(men), no fire(men), no military service(men) or utility repair(men).

Women would be demanding traditional patriarchy be reinstated within hours.

Gizortnik 17 points ago +18 / -1

Don't be too hard on her, guys.

If you thought a male Feminist was the best that a man could be, you would think all men are rapists too.

TheImpossible1 4 points ago +15 / -11

Don't defend these pieces of shit...not even as a joke.

This kind of dehumanization is the precursor to genocide.

Gizortnik 21 points ago +23 / -2

There is not now, and never has been a genocide of men by women. That's not a thing. It's a joke, but only part. They are effectively a mirror universe version of you.

They are bitter, black-pilled, propagandized, and damaged; rationalizing their pain as a political philosophy.

MattTheBlack 3 points ago +8 / -5

Yeah when women abort male children for being male it's actually not genocide lmao

Gizortnik 10 points ago +12 / -2

Are we going to call women aborting girls a genocide? Or men asking their girlfriends to get an abortion a genocide?

These terms don't make sense in this way.

MattTheBlack 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes when you target abortion on specific criteria its a genocide. China genocided girls. Sanger wanted to genocide blacks

Gizortnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

As a targeted system, yes. But the abortion of boys in the west has been entirely individual. Maybe you can argue that it's eugenics, but I don't think I'd count it as a genocide.

TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +7 / -9

There literally unequivocally is, there's just question over intent. The legal definition of genocide has been crossed a while ago.

Why do you think the UN suddenly wants to repeal the Rome Statute on "persecution of a gender"? We have a case against them. We just need someone to file it and a court women haven't corrupted to hear it.

Gizortnik 9 points ago +10 / -1

We have a case against them.

No you don't. Even if I agreed to your premise, you still don't. That's like saying Donald Trump has a case against the New York Attorney General's office. Even though he does, he doesn't.

You might as well say you have a case against the UN Peacekeeping Forces raping children, if you take it to the International Criminal Court.

Or that Count Dankula has a case against the Scottish Police.

Or that January 6th Defendants have a case for the violation of their 4th and 5th amendment rights.

TheImpossible1 -3 points ago +5 / -8

I addressed this.

and a court women haven't corrupted to hear it.

elleand202 5 points ago +10 / -5

This kind of dehumanization is the precursor to genocide.

Which is fascinating, because you dehumanize women every day.

TheImpossible1 -7 points ago +5 / -12

How cute, did Master say you can look at her bare thighs for that one?

LibertyPrimeWasRight 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’m not trying to get involved in this mess, but shouldn’t it be Mistress? The leftist annihilation of gendered terms is a loss for both clarity and culture.

TheImpossible1 -2 points ago +2 / -4

Mistress is a fetish thing, Master is slavery.

Basically, I'm mocking him for defending his slavemasters against mean words.

LibertyPrimeWasRight 4 points ago +4 / -0

I thought Mistress was also the correct address for a female slaveowner, or other position of authority. That’s where the use for fetish shit comes from, right?

TheImpossible1 -1 points ago +2 / -3

Possibly. I wouldn't know. I don't have anyone into femdom in my life.

The women into it are psychotic and the men into it are pathetic.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
AlfredicEnglishRules [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0


DefinitelyNotIGN 14 points ago +14 / -0

There's just too many joke answers to give.

Jack 14 points ago +14 / -0

In their minds women were slaves and all men were kings.

In reality: "Honey, frost set in early. Looks like we're starving to death this winter. But we'll do it together, you, me and our 8 kids."


"Honey, I'm too old or lame from previous battles, come spring when the raiders arrive by sea and after they kill me, give yourself up and maybe they'll just rape and not kill you."


"Honey, I'm growing some pustules around my armpits, if you're not feeling feverish after I'm dead could you give me a Christian burial?"

and finally

"Honey, we're getting married, not by choice but because our fathers decided this is the best arrangement for a strong alliance. Welp, I'm off to battle and watching my back for any court intrigues and betrayals. Sorry you can't own any property, so unfair I know."

Assassin47 7 points ago +7 / -0

Damn, history hits hard.

SoctaticMethod1 13 points ago +13 / -0

So the supply of rug munchers is going down because they also have to suck the feminine dick so they'd rather be straight because then they also get a guy that's stronger than them usually, less chance of STDs and less prone to go crazy and main themselves.

-Fender- 4 points ago +4 / -0

Are you saying that the STD rate is higher in lesbian women than straight couples? Because if so, then that's news to me. I would've assumed that there would be fewer direct exchanges of fluids, or contact with blood through micro-lesions, than straight couples or gay ones.

SoctaticMethod1 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's higher around 'lesbians' that also have a dick...

I think the left have successfully destroyed the meaning behind any words relating to sex that I can only use monogamous and degenerates

-Fender- 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fair enough.

Assassin47 10 points ago +10 / -0

straight woman

Lesbians abuse their domestic partners more than your "natural predator".

Nathrandir 9 points ago +9 / -0

The myriad of natural predators that have hunted humans over the ages have been kept at bay and brought to heel by the very men you so gleefully demonize.

Your welcome for the safety you enjoy. I'll expect no thanks from ingrates like you, of course.

Adamrises 8 points ago +8 / -0

What's funny is for years you couldn't escape that Maroon 5 song about hunting down women and eating them alive like animals. And it isn't men who listened to fucking Maroon 5 or put that song on repeat daily.

Like always, its just women complaining about something they want men to do, that way they have the plausible deniability to act like they hate it to save public face.

BourbonGrizzly 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is that what that she will be loved song is about?

Jack 6 points ago +6 / -0

Willing to take less than favorable odds that this broad flick her beans to the type of porn she's projecting in that tweet.

Brennus 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well only if you are dating male feminist.

NotMacgyver 5 points ago +5 / -0

There comes a point in a person's life where the universe sets things up in such a way that aan must decide on whether to make a joke about male feminists or beastiality.

Either way she could just start dating NORMAL HUMANS.

deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
barwhack 4 points ago +4 / -0

No worries, L. There's always cats.

CoreyAnder 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is that a pic of her doing stand up while holding a dog? What a nutcase

RandomFurryDude 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh the horror, being a straight woman is wild because you have to date the only thing on the planet which is capable of making you produce MORE straight women.

TheImpossible1 0 points ago +7 / -7

Posted in June, currently not banned. Do better, Elon.


If you're not going to deal with women's hate then you're just another Dorsey. I don't believe that it hasn't been reported yet.

Also, OP, with friends like those, you don't need enemies.

AlfredicEnglishRules [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's what it was like growing up in Seattle. Friends, but be very careful.