Comments (7)
sorted by:
ernsithe 19 points ago +19 / -0

Definitely Wal-Mart. A workplace shooting is nowhere near as exploitable as one at a gay club.

ernsithe 7 points ago +7 / -0

I underestimated them. The move seems to be to cover the Wal-Mart shooter, interview employees from the store, etc. never showing the perpetrator. Then move into coverage of the club shooter and feature images of him prominently.

FrozeInFear 9 points ago +9 / -0

I'm afraid this may feed an overall gun push. They may skimp specifics soon if "shooting" stories pile up and the MSM pays attention specifically to gun violence statistics.

FuckGenderPolitics 9 points ago +9 / -0

Which is why GOP control of the House is a massive white pill, even for someone as black pilled as I am.

FuckGenderPolitics 9 points ago +9 / -0

I'd guess the Walmart shooter. It seems they're trying to deny the Q shooter alphabet mafia protection in favor a "white male terrorism" narrative to push gun control and possibly feed into the moral panic about incels. It seems easier for them to hide the 13/52 incident at Walmart.

Six_z3r0 5 points ago +5 / -0

Plus, plugging fags always gets air. "Why won't someone think of the fags!?"

SoctaticMethod1 5 points ago +5 / -0

The Walmart one as they'd definitely want to hide the fact constant customer interactions with Karens may have increased the possibility of customer facing employees going postal.