86
Comments (66)
sorted by:
57
TakenusernameA 57 points ago +57 / -0

Biological race doesnt exist, its based on flawed European ideas

White Man Bad!

22
Gizortnik 22 points ago +23 / -1

This has nothing to do with race.

The problem is that Islam doesn't play well with others, and Muslims and Hindus have been at each other's throats in the Indus Valley since the Muslims subverted the fucking Mongols and founded the Mugal Empire... and then proceeded for the next several centuries to eradicate all other religious orders in southern Asia.

Besides, you missed the primary target: they didn't say white. They said English.

Being that England is the center of Liberal philosophy and the emergence of Capitalism; that is why they want English history, law, culture, language, and philosophy to die.

They don't blame the Scotts, Irish, Welsh, and French; even though all of them have similar ties. It's England specifically. The very nature of their stereotype of "white" stems from the English controlling Britain, and from "WASPs" which are effectively English-specific culture.

9
ItsOkayToBeWight 9 points ago +9 / -0

If they would just convert to Islam then this would just be a nonissue.

If these fly over state people would just convert to wokeism then this country would start healing.

9
Euphemism 9 points ago +9 / -0

if they just would walk into the ovens, we wouldn't have had to ship them by train...

Amazing how uniform the evil always is... You'd think we'd be better are recognising it now.

4
ParadigmShift2070 4 points ago +4 / -0

if they would just take the shower we wouldn't have to make them ride the underground minecart roller-coaster

2
Gizortnik 2 points ago +2 / -0

And don't worry about converting to a different religion. That would never be allowed to happen.

If Islam is a Religion of Peace, why did the Sikhs literally create a religious "2nd Amendment" after their king was brutally murdered on a diplomatic mission to the (Islamic) Mugal Empire, to prevent the Mugals from invading after there had been hundreds of low-kinetic violent assaults, murders, and lynchings on Sikh populations living near Muslim territory.

They carry ceremonial daggers now, but it used to literally just be full swords.

Imagine being ordered to carry AR-15's on a sling because the Muslims wouldn't stop trying to murder people.

Imagine explaining that in a emergency religious meeting, and then everyone agreeing with it.

"Now here this, everyone. The King was murdered by the Godless Mugals, and it just so happens that God spoke to me in a dream. God just told me that it is the responsibility of every follower of His to, and let me quote this verbatum: 'Stay Strapped or Get Clapped'. Uh... so, I think that means we're all gonna carry swords from now on."

"From my experience, this is a completely reasonable decision. God is very wise. Where's my sword?"

47
dekachin 47 points ago +48 / -1

Indians and Pakistanis would have lived in total harmony if those damned Hwhite old British men didn't draw a line on a map!!!

Actually they were at each other's throats and would and soon launched into a genocidal civil war if it wasn't for the fact that the pakis were given their own country to fuck off to instead. Even then, they managed to do some wars anyway.

15
SupremeReader [S] 15 points ago +15 / -0

Including between West and East Pakistans (today Pakistan and Bangladesh).

12
NoGardE 12 points ago +12 / -0

There's an argument to be made that, because the British Empire strategy was to make an ethnic minority into the local ruling class, subject to Britain (in order to keep them loyal, they need British support or they get mobbed), it inflamed ethnic tensions.

However, that ignores that the ethnic tensions needed to be there in the first place for the British to exploit.

11
dekachin 11 points ago +12 / -1

Pakistan was not created until the British left. Hindus were always the large majority in India, about 70% to about 20% for Muslims.

The British didn't favor the Muslims. But during WW2, the Hindus were rebellious, while the Muslims supported the British.

The Muslims, knowing they were the minority, did not want to be dominated by the Hindus, and Muslim League pushed for the creation of Pakistan. It was successful.

When the partition happened after independence, even though it was called the "Radcliffe Line", the line was drawn by commissions of top Hindus and Muslims chaired by Radcliffe. It wasn't like some white dude just drew an arbitrary line on a map like dumb libs think.

4
ItsOkayToBeWight 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's happening again today. The alphabet people are a minority but they are being elevated to ruling class status.

10
DickCactus 10 points ago +10 / -0

Indians and Pakis hating each other is a tale as old as time…

3
TomSeeSaw 3 points ago +4 / -1

TIL 75 years is "old as time"

10
Euphemism 10 points ago +10 / -0

to be fair - that entire region has been at each others throats since time began. We can change the labels for the different groups, but the actions and methods are always the same. Kill the other.

2
TomSeeSaw 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is different from everywhere else how?

3
BandageBandolier 3 points ago +3 / -0

They could have reunified if they wanted, no-one was stopping them but themselves.

But it turns out the only interaction the majority of people on either side of that border wanted with each other is sectarian violence and the occasional veiled nuclear threat.

42
YouAreAPirate 42 points ago +44 / -2

Are Americans fundamentally incapable of seeing racial conflicts outside of white vs not-white?

37
theradraccoon 37 points ago +38 / -1

We’ve been taught it would be racist to do so.

30
Ahaus667 30 points ago +30 / -0

These aren’t Americans, they’re the overprivileged spawn of foreigners who think that somehow living in America makes them victims.

26
dekachin 26 points ago +27 / -1

Liberals think the evil Hwhite man is the root of all evil in world history. It's all part of the lib conspiracy to promote cultural marxism.

-16
Tourgen -16 points ago +1 / -17

"the libs"? It's part of "the lib conspiracy"?

Are you a bot? How stupid are you?

9
Ricky_CIA 9 points ago +9 / -0

Fuck off retard.

Cultural marxism is the religion of the left wing in the US.

5
ParadigmShift2070 5 points ago +5 / -0

he's saying "the libs" is really (((the libs)))

5
Brennus 5 points ago +5 / -0

Leftist are

5
Ohdeerlordman 5 points ago +5 / -0

Are they not aware of the Indian caste system?

31
Kaarous 31 points ago +31 / -0

The only time in the past millennium where Hindus and muslims weren't killing each other was when the British stopped the sectarian violence by force.

They can't even be grateful for a century of peace. Clearly they can't be fixed and we shouldn't waste any further effort.

30
Daucus9 30 points ago +30 / -0

Just wait until this bitch finds out about the caste system.

29
Smith1980 29 points ago +29 / -0

Disney taking shots at white people? Shocking! Although I’m no expert in that region but weren’t there constant conflict between the two groups?

20
TakenusernameA 20 points ago +20 / -0

Pretty sure its an Islam vs Hinduism religious feud.

18
Grumman 18 points ago +18 / -0

Islam vs. Sikhism too. Muslims are the reason why Sikhs have a religious duty to be armed at all times.

9
LauriThorne 9 points ago +9 / -0

And Islam vs Christianity, and Islam vs Judaism, and Islam vs Islam.

Damn Muslims, they ruined islam!

6
TomSeeSaw 6 points ago +6 / -0

Because Islam has no problem with anyone else. Just ask the Jews, Christians, Buddhists.

4
JuliasEbola00 4 points ago +4 / -0

Snowfall is on Disney Plus too, and it's full of "the white men this", "the with man that", even though it's a story about a black man who happily floods his own community with crack in the name of making money.

2
Smith1980 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea I watched it. I noticed the irony as well. Same with those who blame white people for bad neighborhoods and cheer on rioting and looting in the very same neighborhoods

17
BetterNameUnfound 17 points ago +17 / -0

"Oh no, a crying child! We must throw away civilization! Fuck having borders and law and shit..."

17
Unknownsailor 17 points ago +17 / -0

Never mind the estimated 200 plus million Hindu in India that died at the hands of Muslim invaders.

What we call Pakistan now used to be India, before the caliphates invaded.

17
Assassin47 17 points ago +17 / -0

Indians in India definitely don't believe this. (unless they are virtue signaling in front of westerners)

17
GreatGrapesOfWrath 17 points ago +18 / -1

In fact, some recent violence is threatening to start a full race war in India right now.

Evidently, some Muslims murdered a shopkeep on video who what blaspheming the prophet.

And with Kashmir always on the verge of exploding (as it always is), I'm sure this is a very imaginary border and some kind of western misunderstanding.

9
TomSeeSaw 9 points ago +9 / -0

There was no blaspheming of the prophet.

A woman politician quoted lines from muslim's own scriptures on how the profit married Aisha at 6 and fucked her at 9. This blew up, and she got fired. Death threats etc.

A tailor in India posted on social media that he supported politicians right to speech with her picture.

Muslims brought out the sharpened sword. The rest is bloody Eid.

3
sasanian 3 points ago +3 / -0

Brahmin immigrants, especially women, are the ones leading the charge on this.

15
TentElephant 15 points ago +17 / -2

Running away? India was costing a lot to maintain, so they astroturfed Gandhi to give them an excuse to leave. But, the British were the only thing keeping the diversity from massacring each other, so they did their best to draw a hilariously complex border, with enclaves inside enclaves inside enclaves inside enclaves, and that barely helped.

9
Gizortnik 9 points ago +9 / -0

"Running Away". You asked them to leave, bitch.

12
Filo76 12 points ago +12 / -0

Much like the native Americans, who were a gentle and peaceful folk before white man arrived, the Indians were living in a utopia for thousands of years before the Brits showed up.

5
Mpetey123 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, and the maori or anyone who isn't European. I hate this simplistic view of people and history. And most people who think this don't realize they are perpetuating the "noble savage" myth. I think of South America with the entire lesson being Conquistadors were bad, just evil and bad. But they don't talk about the tribes that helped and fought alongside the Conquistadors. History is never as easy as good vs. bad.

1
Filo76 1 point ago +1 / -0

There was no human sacrifice in the Americas until the Conquistadors came along! /s

Also: the worst massacres and atrocities in history were perpetuated by the Mongols. Genghis and his descendants were not what we call “Europeans”.

10
Mpetey123 10 points ago +10 / -0

You ask them every conflict in Africa is whitey's fault as well. Must be nice to know everything is always whitey's fault and you have no blame for it

4
Gizortnik 4 points ago +4 / -0

In fairness, the post-colonial African struggles for Leftist Nationalism... otherwise known as National Socialism, as well as the rise of straight up Communism of African countries, lead to the 2nd Congolese War which was the 3rd bloodiest conflict in all of the 20th century, ravaged most of Africa, inspired the Rawandan genocide, and all of it was based of Leftist ideology that had been spread by white intellectuals.

They didn't have to kill and eat everyone, but every single white person with money and power internationally told them that killing and eating each other was okay if you did it for the right reason, which always happened to be a Leftist one.

So, at least, there's a little blame there for the post-colonial period.

2
NewNameIguess 2 points ago +2 / -0

but every single white person with money and power internationally told them that killing and eating each other was okay if you did it for the right reason, which always happened to be a Leftist one.

How many were actually White vs those who are (((white)))?

10
Royalalbatross 10 points ago +10 / -0

Somehow, the people who are currently perpetuating the old hatred (and have been for decades without any British help) are blameless little children.

9
Knife-TotingRat 9 points ago +9 / -0

See, there's really no point in distinguishing between one kind of paki and another. They're all just pakis.

9
ApparentlyImAHeretic 9 points ago +9 / -0

Indian, Paki, what's the difference?

Signed: Disney

8
Steampunk_Moustache 8 points ago +8 / -0

Considering England does not have such a thing as free speech laws, if it were up to me, I'd ban this blood libeling filth.

5
TomSeeSaw 5 points ago +5 / -0

"The Hindu elaborates his argument, while the Moslem sharpens his sword"

- Winston Churchill

5
FatalConceit 5 points ago +5 / -0

keep review bombing this shit

5
TomSeeSaw 5 points ago +5 / -0

FYI - It was the first PM of Pakistan that demanded a separate country, when he realized he wouldn't get absolute power after the British left.

It was a muslim power monger that wanted the divide, and make no mistake, the British were happy to cut along the dotted lines. The Indian government at the time was filled with "we are all brothers yo!" folks, and for the next 40 years they lived in delusions of "sanctimonious socialism".

4
joeyjojoshabadoo1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Just hug.

And get blowed up sure, but just hug.

And hug and hug and and hug and hug some more.

4
Brennus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why lie like that? you can look up why their are tensions between India and Pakistan and none of it has to do with an Englishman…….. leftist gonna leftist I suppose

3
LawNmowermaN 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lines on a map in Asia, Africa, South and Central America

How could white men do this? You can't just intermingle racial groups randomly and deny people access to their own personal ancestral homelands! Everyone will kill each other!

Lines on a map in Europe and North America

Borders aren't real, bigot! Let everyone in!

3
NotAGlowy 3 points ago +3 / -0

what is this movie?

7
theradraccoon 7 points ago +7 / -0

The superhero miniseries Ms. Marvel.

3
NewNameIguess 3 points ago +3 / -0

I guess technically if you don't have multiple governments to formally declare war on each other you don't have war. You have rampant violence everywhere instead, at least with wars you have more clear lines and there are relatively safe territories, with diversity everywhere is a warzone.

3
GimmeFuelGimmeFire 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe so, but it is sustained by tribalism between Indians and Pakistanis who are two distinct groups of people. Race is real.

2
Honeypot02 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s been a hundred fifty years, if there’s a problem with your border that’s on you