107
Comments (19)
sorted by:
19
MeMeWantMilky 19 points ago +19 / -0

Biden's America, chicken is now a bonafide racist after this experience. He will shave his head and get a swastika tattoo for real now

17
Smithereens 17 points ago +18 / -1

All laws go out the window when niggers chimp out

Just a peek of cultural communism and the great reset

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
3
trustnoplan 3 points ago +4 / -1

Loitering probably because he was eating on a parking lot. He could have probably explained the reason he was doing that was because of the callers and TTS.

6
Smithereens 6 points ago +7 / -1

eating

loitering

pick one

4
trustnoplan 4 points ago +4 / -0

You can do both? He was eating on a piece of broken furniture in the parking lot.

5
Smithereens 5 points ago +5 / -0

Loitering is the act of remaining in a particular public place for a protracted time, without any apparent purpose.

Eating is a purpose for staying immobile

1
trustnoplan 1 point ago +2 / -1

But, it wasn't a specific place for eating. It's wasn't a patio, or seating area outside of a eatery. You can get arrested for loitering if you are drinking/smoking a cig on a parking lot even though your purpose was to drink or smoke a cig.

1
Smithereens 1 point ago +1 / -0

Drinking or smoking isn't a comparable example

You can get a picnic in public places it doesn't have to be a eating designated place. The whole point of loitering laws is to stop suspect activity with potential for crime

1
trustnoplan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, here's the GA law. "O.C.G.A. §16-11-36 states that a person commits the offense of loitering or prowling when he is in a place at a time or in a manner not usual for law-abiding individuals under circumstances that warrant a justifiable and reasonable alarm or immediate concern for the safety of persons or property in the vicinity." - Obviously the "safety" would be the reason he was charged, if he was charged.

2
Smithereens 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why wouldn't the time or place not be usual to eat? it was broad daylight there were no safety concerns

btw did you watch https://twitter.com/scuffedalice/status/1436865566573203457?s=21 ? the nigger cunt said he loitered because he walked around business filming. Its bs wrongful arrest they made up charges to get back at them over perceived racism

1
shawshanks 1 point ago +1 / -0

"persons" refers to people within the vicinity of the individual being charged with loitering, not the individual themself. one of those dumb fucks literally had an AR, the only person in danger was the person being held captive at gunpoint whose property had been stolen.

1
KarmaIsReal100 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe there were No Loitering signs ... or whatever. He should Google zoom into that area and see if there was.... lol I know that's extreme but would at least be a defense if there wasn't. He couldn't leave cuz they comindeared his shit. And he legit seemed to just sit down with his food .

2
KarmaIsReal100 2 points ago +2 / -0

But due to Biden America and how crazy the world is now...one mention of anything racist throws all existing rights out the window.

3
AlexIsAStupid 3 points ago +3 / -0

It was probably nigger cops and they probably don't even wanna listen to any excuses or explanation

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
louthegooddude 1 point ago +1 / -0

we gon suuue that city! suuue that city! suuue that city! …u hear meh?

-1
KarmaIsReal100 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Tbf his little ass is lucky he didn't die out there. Normally they would not have called the cops. He's lucky it was an older black guy that was like call 911....instead of stomping him immediately. Ijs let's be realistic here.