157
Comments (30)
sorted by:
18
harkk 18 points ago +18 / -0

Reuters is worse than CNN and the NYT.

5
Island_Photo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Reuters designates itself a lightnig rod for disdain.

10
Silex 10 points ago +11 / -1

Reuters is a Rothschild property.

5
Aspie 5 points ago +5 / -0

The Thomson family from Canada owns Reuters.

2
LoneWulf 2 points ago +4 / -2

Who owns the Thomsons?

5
Aspie 5 points ago +5 / -0

They are a rich family who have bought and sold major media in the past. The only problem with them that I'm sure of is that they live in Canada. Canada was a great place when I visited back in the 60s, but I wouldn't go there now.

2
CanadianAnon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Canada is a HUGE country. Lots of great places with awesome, Awake people. That’s like visiting New York City and saying “I visited the US and it used to be great, but I wouldn’t go there now.”

Good and bad in ALL countries. We are all, everywhere, being abused by our governments and the cabal.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
CanadianAnon 1 point ago +1 / -0

We have a lot of work to do. Cheers.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Silex 1 point ago +1 / -0

Found this :

«If you believe this, then you clearly don’t have a desire to dig deeper into majority shareholder ownership and the quorum that is achieved through private acquisitions and even publicly traded companies like Thomson Corporation. Thomson Reuters operated under a dual-listed structure and had two parent companies, both of which were publicly listed — Thomson Reuters Corporation and Thomson Reuters plc.

For instance, Paul Julius Reuters was working directly with Rothschild going all the way back to 1850!

https://www.rothschildarchive.org/collections/treasure_of_the_month/february_2019_telegraphic_code_books_south_american_business_1909_1938

There’s even many who said Rothschild was an early investor in Reuters (a private company who does not need to list shareholders) which led to Rothschild controlling interest in the Bank of England. Even if Rothschild didn’t purchase

Ironically, Associated Press was started in 1846 by Moses Yale Beach to consolidate telegraph costs for his Boston and NY Papers (again, privately owned so you will not have privileged information as to full share ownership distribution). His cousin? ELIHU YALE who was President of the British East India Company settlement in Fort St. George, at Madras. He is best remembered as the primary benefactor of Yale College, which was named in his honor. Skull and Bones, on and on. Let’s leave that fraternal order aside and discuss the direct connection to British East India Company and Nathan Rothschild: https://www.rothschildarchive.org/collections/treasure_of_the_month/december_2017_east_india_company_stock_list_1815 . Rothschild understood clearly the benefits of controlling the distribution of information: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histoire_des_agences_de_presse (switch to English translation) “Ouvrard launches into a financial battle on the London Stock Exchange. He speculated on the decline in French government bonds, while Nathan Rothschild , on the contrary, played on the rise 66.” In 2011 Sir Evelyn de Rothschild gave a talk at Peking University at which he said (@7:20):

[Talking about his families banking empire] We covered Europe. We covered the European Union that we have today. From that grew a business which was successfully built upon an understanding between the five brothers. The five brothers used to talk to each other through writing. That was one side. They were also the first client of a man called Mr. Reuter. Mr. Reuter made his name by flying pigeons around the world, and if you couldn’t send messages, you used a pigeon. And that’s why we were the first client of the great house of Reuter. Which as you know became the most important messaging company in the world today. And from that it grew, over a period of time.

There is also a plaque in front of Royal Exchange London which is a commemoration to Edmond L'de Rothschild. It says:

The supply of information to the world’s traders in securities, commodities and currencies was then, as is now the mainspring of Reuters activities & the guarantee of the founder’s aims of accuracy, rapidity and reliability. News services based on those principles now go to news papers, radio & television networks & governments throughout the world. Reuters has faithfully continued the work begun here to attest this & to honour Paluullius Reuter. The memorial was set here by Reuters to Mark the 125th anniversary of Reuters foundation & inaugurated by Edmond L’de Rothschild td 13-10-76

For decades the media has fallen under the ownership of a few corporations who through their editorial control have created a socially engineered construct which represents a fabricated version of reality. In order to maintain this artificial illusion the media exercises a program of censorship of all news and events of importance and replaces the truth with lies, distortion, distraction and omission. The media thereby create a false version of reality in order to keep the public compliant and controlled. To say that Rothschild was not invested at all in British East India Company or Associated Press or Reuters would be disingenuous and naïve.»

7
inquimous 7 points ago +8 / -1

It makes as much sense as saying that there are "comms" connected to a thunderstorm killing elderly people on holiday.

5
dty6 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's almost like you believe the news

1
inquimous 1 point ago +2 / -1

Your lifetime odds of being struck by lightning are about 1 to 16,000. There are over a billion flashes around the world in a year. Fortunately most people survive. https://www.cdc.gov/disasters/lightning/victimdata.html Nice chart of lightning deaths here showing that the area around DC has relatively few.

I can't believe 99% of this "It's comms!" stuff. Comms from God that you shouldn't stand under trees in a thunderstorm, maybe, but people aren't going around setting off lightning strikes, volcanos, tsunamis, sink holes, etc. to make some political point. I have yet to see some rationality behind any of these claims. Comms from whom about what directed to whom for what effect? Who communicates with events that have random results?

2
harkk 2 points ago +2 / -0

My great-grandfather was driving my then 9 month old father and my grandmother to his home for a visit in his Model A when the car was struck by lightning, Grandma had no later problems, Daddy turned blue but was okay. My great-grandfather died a month later from the injuries he received.

1
brain_dead 1 point ago +1 / -0

Haha.

4
GDZeus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Good grief 🤦‍♀️

4
Paul_Revere 4 points ago +4 / -0

I link it to God telling us what he thinks of Senile Joe bidet.

3
Bedminster 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oh well that settles it then I guess. Pack it up Boys we're out this bitch!

2
Kunkussion 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hell, just Google "why is it raining more in 2022". Pages of results "because of climate change". But no mention of anything according to actual meteorology and atmospheric research.

2
Zadok 2 points ago +2 / -0

I stuck a hairpin in the electric plug. Sparked like hell and knocked me on my ass. I blame global warming too.

2
Infidel440 2 points ago +2 / -0

There’s some odd things going on in that video. An orange diamond at the bottom and and an orange pillar in middle before strike and then orange diamond seems to shoot off to the left.

2
FreedomLover2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sure.. why not!

2
momster2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I say it is God giving DC a warning.

2
SJBHamilton 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lightning has never struck anybody before. Through thousands and thousands of years of man's existence on planet earth.

And it's because we drive gas-fueled cars and use plastic straws that it's our fault. That's what this mediacracy wants us to believe.

2
kish-kumen 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sometimes people get struck by lightning.

2
ViaToil 2 points ago +2 / -0

They were in the park, often people are idiots who take shelter under trees, really bad place to be standing when lightning is going on.

2
brain_dead 2 points ago +2 / -0

None of those big news outlets are worth your time or your money.

I come over here for news. Most people are smart and think critically. You don't get a lot of fake news and brain dead types following.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0