271
Comments (32)
sorted by:
18
impera 18 points ago +18 / -0

Violence and threats against people due to their age (supposedly against the rules) is what groomers do. No banning for them I guess?

Another screencap to add to the 'twitter are child-rape supporters' file.

14
PurpleTea 14 points ago +16 / -2

Here is the thing. The only profitable and biblical relationship is between a man and a woman. Anything else outside of that will lead to a slippery slope of confusion and evil.

Gays Against Groomers was a little too late. They banded together two months ago (I believe that's about the time line) when all the drag and gender confirmation crap was at the height of it's existence. They should have been shouting from the roof tops years ago. But they didn't because deep down they know they can't push back. The sexual revolution rule is "anything goes". They can't start defining what is wrong and right because anything apart from Gods created order is ....wrong.

8
289m 8 points ago +8 / -0

to be fair, they didn't push back because they didn't think they needed to. the grooming aspect of lgbt has only been widely exposed recently

2
PurpleTea 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is your definition of "recent? because iv watch this all transpire on Twitter...And it didn't start happening two days ago even two months ago.

Libsoftiktok has been exposing public school teachers preaching gender grooming topics for over a year now. We all saw that back then and thought they were groomers then. Where was Gays Against Groomers then? Well they probably agreed with teaching some of the LGBT topics with kids. Like Billy's Two Daddy's or Billy's Two Mommy's. But it didn't just stop there. It went even further with Billy Turns into Katie....ect.

That's my argument. It's too late. The majority LGBT community has affirmed grooming in one way or another. It's full speed ahead now. Until it crashes and I hope it does.

1
289m 1 point ago +1 / -0

i think a year is pretty recent. but no, the majority of lgbt is not okay with pedophilia. if it seems that way, its because you're seeing the psyop part of it, like msm or reddit. the opinions there do not represent regular people.

1
PurpleTea 1 point ago +1 / -0

Things are escalating so quickly a year without saying anything... is like 10 years. Just my opinion.

1
289m 1 point ago +1 / -0

it is, if you know what the agenda is and the worst of whats happening. but most people are pretty unaware. just because anons have exposed things, doesn't mean the majority are paying attention. this is the pace at which society changes: slowly. people need time to figure shit out. its a painful process to watch for those who have been paying attention.

2
Mcmurdo32 2 points ago +2 / -0

They can push back. There is consenting adults who have the right to engage in whatever odd relationship with other consenting adults they want, and then there are minors who must be protected at all costs.

0
PurpleTea 0 points ago +1 / -1

Of course they can push back. I'm not saying they shouldn't. I'm saying it's too late.

As a Christian I say no. It's not ok for even adults to consent to anything outside of marriage between a man and a woman. And it leads to the situation we have today. No one knows what a woman is and men are competing in national athletic competitions against women.

Those same adults apart of the LGBT community are teaching these kids to chop of body parts and change their pronouns in spite of their parents saying not to.

1
Mcmurdo32 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. Everyone who finds themselves with one or more of the aphabet tendencies needs to talk with God and ask Him what He wants him to do with those feelings.

0
GoingCamaro 0 points ago +1 / -1

"Do not judge least ye be Judged"

You may submit to the Bible as an authority in your life, but it is NOT the authority of this land. We are not a theocracy. People need to choose Jesus for themselves and theocratic rule robs people of that choice.

Learn the difference between sin and evil and you'll start to realize your religion seeks to control your life for its own gains, not better it.

1
PurpleTea 1 point ago +1 / -0

James 5: 19-20

My brothers, if anyone among you wanders from the truth and someone brings him back, let him know that whoever brings back a sinner from his wandering will save his soul from death and will cover a multitude of sins.

Confusing "judging" with a call of "rebuke" is pretty typical for those who hate to hear that they are sinners in need of a savior. Judging is reserved for God.

9
SuddenRealization 9 points ago +9 / -0

Title says Instagram but image says Twitter. Can we tidy up the ship?

5
PurpleTea 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yea as far as I know this particular case was a Twitter issue. They perhaps posted it on Instagram too.

7
VaccinesCauseSIDS 7 points ago +7 / -0

So which rule was specifically broken?

Are they trying to imply that grooming is just another sexual orientation… or a serious disease?

6
PurpleTea 6 points ago +6 / -0

Many social media companies are banding together to stop people from using the word "groomer".

https://twitter.com/againstgroomers/status/1553014579009044481?t=1ANZzh3HaYGXznVO3tXj6g&s=19

Above is the low down on this particular case.

6
Stumpycake 6 points ago +6 / -0

To see who rules over you, find the group that you're not allowed to criticize.

1
ILoveIvermectin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok boomer

5
335K 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is one of the ways EVERYONE wakes up.

4
DeusAutismus 4 points ago +4 / -0

So twitter decided pedophilia is just another sexual orientation that shouldn't be discriminated against?! Jesus... help us

4
HatePickingUserNames 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not recently. Twitter has been very pro-pedo for years. You post a clever meme, they will remove it and ban you in seconds. However, it has and is very difficult to get them to take down child porn. Their excuse is that it's technically challenging but the fact that they can get rid of memes they don't like so quickly and thoroughly shows that it's not.

Here is 1 example of an article talking about it. There are many. The won't remove child porn for nothing short of a court order:

https://scriberrnews.com/2021/01/27/twitter-will-not-remove-child-pornography-because-it-does-not-violate-policies/

3
OneArmedViolinist 3 points ago +3 / -0

If your company does not allow “hateful conduct” against child groomers, your company deserves to die in a fire.

3
PitBoss711 3 points ago +3 / -0

Looks to me like it's Twitter's rules instead of Instagram's. Isn't Instagram owned by Facebook (aka Meta Platforms, Inc.)?

2
Joys1Daughter 2 points ago +2 / -0

I-R-O-N-Y

2
SuckaFree 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm trying to figure out how that post violates standards.

Edit: also makes me wonder if Insta's ran by groomers.

2
lovestospooge 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's not IG, that's Twitter.

2
CaptainChrisPBacon 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is many Straight groomers also. We need to be against all these sickos. They are going to hell and burn in a special place for groomer children for sex.

2
KewMan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Meanwhile on Twitter: porn with underaged (looking) boys and girls.

1
SoMuchWinning45 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'll give them credit for trying.

1
Hope70 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, Instagram/Twitter says it all: they welcome groomers and pedophiles with open arms, as well as promote it.

-1
Manilla -1 points ago +1 / -2

Eh. It's just fags being silenced by more aggressive fags. To hell with them. We don't need help from fags to get our message out.

Later faggots!

2
penisse [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need everyone against these demons. I don’t care what takes place in their bedroom as long as it’s between consenting adults.

1
GoingCamaro 1 point ago +2 / -1

Amen. This country's supreme law protects the sacred right to choose for ourselves. A theocracy is another form of tyranny that robs people of that choice.