This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.
104
Behold, Antarctica from Space! (media.greatawakening.win) LOCKED FLAT EARTH POST
posted ago by Logic20xx ago by Logic20xx +113 / -9
Comments (134)
sorted by:
18
Fatality 18 points ago +20 / -2 stickied

Locking for Flat Earth:

Q/GreatAwakening is the focus here. Flat Earth posts lead to heated fights and takes away from that focus.

Long-running, conclusive/inconclusive debates over conspiracies like flat earth, big foot, ufo's, mermaids, ghosts, faries, lockness monsters, and other similar things unrelated to greatawakening.win are not permitted, and must go to conspiracies.win.

The users of greatawakening.win work under the assumption the earth's shape is a globe. If the flat earth debate is settled and proves that assumption wrong, this community will revisit that assumption at that time.

tl;dr: if you want to talk flat earth here, get to conspiracies.win to prove it to the world, then we can start talking of it here.

19
FrogFog 19 points ago +22 / -3

The only thing that triggers people more than flat earth is Jesus Christ.

5
ghost_of_aswartz 5 points ago +7 / -2

This sounds like projection to me. It's the flat earth people that are triggered just as much by globalists as the other way around. But only one side is correct and the other side doesn't know how to think, and even more egregioiusly, they don't make any attempt to debunk themselves before they attempt to debunk others, and they throw out nearly 500 yrs of human philosophical thought and won't accept the evidence their shown, and yet cannot be on the same page about their own counterevidence, which makes it very difficult to have any kind of productive argument to attempt to back their claims. They demonstrate all the qualities of a pseudoskeptic

https://www.debunkingskeptics.com/characteristics.php

4
ILearnedToCode 4 points ago +6 / -2

Flat earth doesnt trigger - ignorant shills sliding the forum is what bothers me. This shit is ridiculous. Composite images are how we get all of our images from space

1
Wannastayfree 1 point ago +1 / -0

Amen

1
Munchaussen 1 point ago +3 / -2

The earth is NOT flat, but if it was….would the chemtrails just move out into open space like the Star Wars story text?😬

2
ILearnedToCode 2 points ago +3 / -1

If its flat, there is no space. That's their argument anyways.

Perhaps we are on a large turtle's back

18
StormzAComing 18 points ago +21 / -3

At first, I was wondering why there was an Antarctica post. However, reading the comments definitely did make sense.

Admiral Byrd really did say, when he reached the Trans-Antarctic Mountains, that there was a vast land beyond. Knowing that the mountains were the last mountain range before the Ice Wall, and knowing the general coastline of the Ice Wall, "official," geographers edited maps to show that Antarctica had a big mountain, and then a massive Ice Field beyond. This generally makes sense on a round earth.

With one issue. Even with the advent of space-based satellite systems, exploration of the interior was limited, and still is. They insist that somehow, year-round, temperatures in Antarctica somehow rival Mars, while the North Polar region somehow is, on average, 30+ degrees warmer. And yet, winter temperatures manage to not dip much lower than the average. They base these measurements off of satellite data and about 10 interior weather stations. The continent has a polar climate, ok. But it doesn't explain numerous geographical and meteorological anomalies.

In regards to the fault the anon finds with the above image, I can't help but agree. From a logical standpoint, it should be very easy to get the exact same quality over East Antarctica and West Antarctica. Satellites follow very specific, fine-tuned orbits (supposedly), so why can't they go over both sides at the same time and get imagery?

What it looks like like to me is, everything from the Ross Ice Shelf to the Weddell Sea has been well-mapped at some point. But the other 180 degrees of Antarctic coastline has only been slightly mapped, and virtually none of the interior.

Ever wonder how satellites can fly over the south pole but never once catch a glimpse of the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station?

"Oh, it's just because they can't show that far south on Google Maps!"

What about Google Earth and other globes? They don't show a black circle around either pole anymore. Yet still no south pole stations.

A common misconception is that satellites fly in mostly equatorial orbits, and that's why they can't photo in high detail the polar regions. That is BS. Common practice nowadays is to send satellites in a polar orbit, in such a way that they cover the whole planet every 16 to 17 days. This allows for polar as well as equatorial photos.

But, explain how we can get a vivid image of SATURN'S FRICKING POLAR HEXAGON, but we can't get a SINGLE THING, even CGI, of the South Pole.

Total BS. They are hiding more than you know. The truth will shock the world.

Q 928's last two lines read:

Risk of ‘conspiracy’ label the deeper we go. Truth will SHOCK THE WORLD.

Don't double meanings exist? How about triple? Angela Merkel being Hitler's sperm matters little in the big scheme of things, but free energy? non-round Antarctica?

Some people on here still have very closed minds.

21
Nurarihyon_no_MAGA 21 points ago +21 / -0

The Globalists are hiding something BIG in Antarctica

8
Lawjic 8 points ago +11 / -3

Agree. The flat earth thing is a red herring to distract from what's there. I think it is the ruins (or, like the pyramids, not ruins) of an ancient city with monuments or buildings that would be visible from space.

5
ghost_of_aswartz 5 points ago +5 / -0

Now THAT you can believe without having a globe versus planar argument

8
Logic20xx [S] 8 points ago +11 / -3

Dude, you have a 1/100,000,000 mind.

6
StormzAComing 6 points ago +9 / -3

Thanks! That means a lot to me!

6
Logic20xx [S] 6 points ago +11 / -5

Very refreshing to actually have a person understand the post in the way in was intended. Just look at all the other replies and imagine how I’m smacking my forehead at the way they react.

4
StormzAComing 4 points ago +6 / -2

Yeah. Belittling you, attacking you personally. Very unbecoming of an Awakened crowd.

3
FreedomLover2020 3 points ago +7 / -4

Incorrect, because they are not awakened. They think they are, much like woke crowd. Awakened mind always wonders and thinks it knows nothing, our reality is a mystery.

4
ghost_of_aswartz 4 points ago +7 / -3

Debunk this observation of light and physics then

https://greatawakening.win/p/15IrKq7hys/someone-posted-in-conspiracy-an-/c/

maybe the sun is conspiring against us....

0
AlgaeBanquet 0 points ago +2 / -2

With you 100%

13
Musrum 13 points ago +15 / -2

The only reason posts on flat earth are popping up here is to lay a path so the MSM can laugh at us. Last thing we need is a bunch of flat earthers turning up.

-3
Logic20xx [S] -3 points ago +7 / -10

My posts are apparently so psychologically threatening that people think I’m the Cabal. That’s a fairly hardcore complement, thanks.

11
Logic20xx [S] 11 points ago +16 / -5

The bottom is the picture run through fotoforensics.com

The black area doesn't have the same level of variation / detail as the rest. That's why it shows black.

The straight lines you can see in the pure white area are due to this being a "mosaic", because Antarctica is "too big" to photograph all at once. However, the mosaic lines only exist in the pure white area. The rest is not too big to photograph all at once.

8
Ole1212 8 points ago +9 / -1

What does it implicate then? Serious question.

8
Logic20xx [S] 8 points ago +20 / -12

Until a few weeks ago, I always thought flat earth was stupid. Then I began having discussions with someone who is very wise and level headed. Not like your typical flat earther who lacks an objective mind and simply finds the idea of a flat earth scintillating. I’ve since been searching for proofs either way. Please keep in my that I’m already fully aware of globe theory, and have a 1st class honours degree in aeronautical engineering. I supposed that one of the best proofs would be video footage of Antartica from space. Well, I couldn’t find any of that, so I settled for an image. Even an image was hard to find. Though this ‘mosaic’ image is on the NASA website. Supposedly there are a few others, but I suppose I’ll show this image to a few people and see what they think before I check others. Anyway, a huge chunk in the top image has no detail. Why not? It’s just pure white. I ran it through the photoshop checker, and it shows that the ‘pure white’ section is indeed of a completely different detail level. Though that’s obvious without the forensic tool. My other thoughts on this image are: 1) it looks like someone made a sculpture a foot wide on black felt and took a photo. 2) You cannot see any curvature. Like, if I take a photo of an orange, it will not look flat, just because you can only see part if one side. The light will allow you to see the curvature, no? Well you tell me - can you see curvature of either the continent or the cloud cover? Anyway, what does it imply? Just that for some reason NASA is unable to give even a good photo of Antarctica, a feat which should be easy, no?

26
EZMojo 26 points ago +34 / -8

What’s with these posts lately? I just made this comment on another claim last night.

“I do long exposure astrophotography.

If you take a long exposure photo of the night sky from the north pole the observer sees the stars appear to rotate as circular light streaks around a point directly overhead, where the Earth's rotational axis intersects the sky at the north celestial pole.

An observer located at a mid northern latitude (say 30°) sees the north celestial pole elevated 30° above his northern horizon.

Care to guess what an observer at the equator sees?

Do you know why we see these differences?

We are on a rotating globe”

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
5
Munchaussen 5 points ago +5 / -0

Upvote for common sense.

2
A_whole_nother_thing 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because under a geocentric model, we are stationary and the stars rotate above. The heliocentric model says that our 23.4 degrees of tilt is angled towards Polaris, thus it appears to be stationary with all stars rotating around it.

5
AlgaeBanquet 5 points ago +7 / -2

90 degrees - 23.4 degrees = ...

3
Hayle 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, math really is racist AND satanic

3
AlgaeBanquet 3 points ago +5 / -2

The controllers' fake model math embodies 666 everywhere.

0
Logic20xx [S] 0 points ago +5 / -5

Globe earthers read this and go ‘just a coincidence’, because their entire metaphysics is ‘coincidence’. They believe that life began by coincidence. They believe that their consciousness is a coincidence. 66.6 implies meaning. They deny all meaning. It’s nilhilism.

5
ILearnedToCode 5 points ago +6 / -1

You just said in another comment this isnt about flat earth. You are shilly as fuck

2
Logic20xx [S] 2 points ago +12 / -10

I'm not sure why you're mentioning that at all. Nothing to do with the topic at hand. We're talking about Antarctica. Do you have any comments on the image or Antarctica in general?

17
EZMojo 17 points ago +21 / -4

You’re not sure at all? Are you kidding? Your entire comment I replied to is about this photo being evidence the earth may be flat.

3
MadDad 3 points ago +14 / -11

The earth is flat. Research it before spouting off thinking you’re smart for knowing what we all knew. They lied about everything. Wake up.

10
CQVFEFE 10 points ago +14 / -4

The earth is flat. Research it before spouting off thinking you’re smart for knowing

ROFLMAO

2
BadMamaJama 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why are there cold and hot spots on a flat Earth? Without the notion of 'poles', why wouldn't we all have nearly identical weather (varying by elevation). Theory is that all the suns rays are 'parallel' and hit all of flat Earth at the same rate (very little variation because sun is so far away.) Antarctica elevation varies bet 2000 and 4500k meters (roughly). Ice and snow covered, with permanent snowcap. Appalachian mountains around 6000k meters. No permanent snowcap, melts every year. That would fall in line with a globe theory. With flat Earth, seems like the valleys would be the permanent cold spots.

0
Munchaussen 0 points ago +1 / -1

Link me to the barely watched, years old YT vids you bookmarked… any Planet X vid? I’ll take those as well. 🙄

-2
ghost_of_aswartz -2 points ago +1 / -3

You sound like someone who is either lying or is in desperate need of a high altitude plane flight on a clear night

0
Logic20xx [S] 0 points ago +10 / -10

No, you're taking it that way. I don't jump to such conclusions. I'm talking about why there aren't videos of Antarctica, why the images suck, and why this image in particular has a strange spot in the forensic tool. So you have no comment on the topic at hand? Why don't you just give your thoughts on Antarctica videos/photos, if your mind permits you to do so, rather than just distract you with some other topic.

13
EZMojo 13 points ago +17 / -4

I’m taking it that way?

You specifically said, “Not like your typical flat earther who lacks an objective mind and simply finds the idea of a flat earth scintillating. I’ve since been searching for proofs either way. Please keep in my that I’m already fully aware of globe theory, and have a 1st class honours degree in aeronautical engineering. I supposed that one of the best proofs would be video footage of Antartica from space.”

I replied directly to your point and gave you the proof for which you are looking and you replied with telling me it has nothing to do with the topic at hand.

12
Mr_A 12 points ago +12 / -0

The photo speaks more to Antarctica fraud than to flat earth.

4
Logic20xx [S] 4 points ago +10 / -6

Correct. Why some people are rattling off their flat earth disproving theories instead of talking about Antarctica is telling. They'd be more comfortable with Antarctica being a secret Cabal base full of Nazis, than they would with a flat earth. I think people are so afraid of flat earth, because it would imply they're not the product of chance... that their lives have meaning.

2
Mr_A 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's your theory on Antarctica? Is the entire continent fake? Just a bunch of islands? It would explain the longstanding, never broken peace treaty...

4
Logic20xx [S] 4 points ago +6 / -2

Sorry, I don't have one yet. I'm currently investigating the flat earth "Ice Wall" theory.

2
Mr_A 2 points ago +3 / -1

This guy has one. Says it's fake, that it has been used as a symbolic code for years. That having it in the press is useful regardless of whether it exists in reality. https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/07/31/shepherds-antarctica-comets-malta-etc/

Read his intro if you haven't read his material before. I find his argument very compelling.

GAW's very own u/sleepydude had a great post on Antarctica as well. It's here, if you missed it when he posted. https://greatawakening.win/p/142AwLFHmv/13--thinking-in-symbols-water-ic/

5
igoape 5 points ago +8 / -3

Two reasons why the earth isn't flat: Rhumb lines and great circle routes

5
jasqid 5 points ago +10 / -5

Anyone in the Navy or has sailed a boat knows. It's not flat.

1
BigRichardEnergy 1 point ago +4 / -3

https://youtu.be/3OfbwhU5PQk

I suggest you watch it in its entirety. You're definitely not correct in your statement.

-1
Canadianguy17 -1 points ago +5 / -6

HAHA, nautical maps are based off a flat earth.

3
Logic20xx [S] 3 points ago +7 / -4

You've traversed one of these circle routes personally then, yes? And the same for a rhumb line? Like, you actually have that knowledge, yes? You're not just believing someone else who is believing someone else who is believing someone else? I'd particularly like to hear your personal experience that verified the existence of a circle route. How did you come to know it?

5
Monomial 5 points ago +10 / -5

You don't need to traverse a great circle route. You merely need to calculate direct routes between any 3 points more than 2000 miles apart. Anyone with a boat can do this. You can even do it with flight planning software and just fly small pieces to prove the route is correct. You will quickly realize the interior angles add up to more than 180 degrees, meaning the surface of the earth is positively curved in that region. And since this works between any 3 points, the earth can only be some kind of spheroid.

It ain't flat. There is no lie or conspiracy. You don't need a picture of Antarctica to prove this. You just need to know basic math. If you are truly an aeronautical engineer and don't know this...I sure hope I never have to fly in any aircraft you designed.

-1
Logic20xx [S] -1 points ago +6 / -7

Can you please give me an example of your "3 points 2000 miles apart thought experiment" so that I can better visualize what you're describing?

6
Monomial 6 points ago +6 / -0

Seriously? I wasn't clear?

Pick ANY 3 points at least 2000 miles apart. Use flight planning software to draw a triangle with a direct route between each them. Measure the interior angles of that triangle. (i.e. the incoming vector minus the outgoing vector). When you add them, they will be more than 180 degrees. Irrefutable conclusion: the earth is a spheroid.

I do not have any flight planning software handy. I used to a couple years back, but I haven't been flying in a while. You claim to be an aeronautical engineer. Surely one of your friends has access to a piece of software you can use to convince yourself of this.

1
igoape 1 point ago +4 / -3

I was an aircraft fitter and inspector on widebodys such as B747's, MD 10-11's and Airbus A320's.

-2
Logic20xx [S] -2 points ago +5 / -7

So you haven't traversed the routes you're referring to? And when I said experience, I didn't mean an abstraction. I mean the actual momentary experience(s) that you had, which verified for you the truth of what you're claiming. When you saw something, did something, first hand, that proved it to you.

2
igoape 2 points ago +4 / -2

What the fuck are you going on about? Why do you think i mentioned my aviation experience? Anyone who has traveled more than 1000 miles in an aircraft has gone down a great circle route.

4
SOTUisFUBAR 4 points ago +13 / -9

It has little to do with FE'rs being scintillating or lacking objectiveness, it's about RE'rs being closed minded. No offense.

FE has been made out to be the red headed stepchild of conspiracy theories. Even some of the lamest videos I've seen have some valid points supporting FE. For many it's just too far outside of their comfort zone to have an open mind to. You can tell by how quickly they bash, insult, and try to shutdown any FE comments.

I even made a post a number of months ago, if you're not open minded to FE then you may not be as awake as you think. Or something like that. But I don't see how some can think our entire reality is a fabrication, except that. lol

I think some of the terminology needs to change to lessen the fringeness of it. Such as instead of flat earthers, maybe Bible literalists, and instead of flat earth, I like dome-icile (play on domicile)

3
gobby 3 points ago +3 / -0

I would not say those who believe in the bible believe in the FE. Quite the contrary, for most. Isaiah 40:22 uses the Hebrew word (rendered Chug or Khug) which can be translated either circle or sphere. "It is He who sits above the circle of the earth, and its inhabitants are like grasshoppers; who stretches out the heavens like a curtain, and spreads them like a tent to dwell in."

Keep in mind that a globe, from any angle, will appear as a circle.

For another biblical perspective on the shape of the earth, Ecclesiastes 1:6 gives us this; "The wind blows to the south and goes around to the north; around and around goes the wind, and on its circuits the wind returns."

Both of those verses were written 3,000 + years ago.

2
Logic20xx [S] 2 points ago +7 / -5

Don't worry I completely agree with you on FEs/REs there. I'm kinda playing dumb.

3
Suzeq2018 3 points ago +9 / -6

yes, you're on the right track; we been lied to and those flat earthers really aren't so crazy;)

listen to what JFK has to say about going to the moon; makes it sound preposterous & can hear his sarcasm.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=th5A6ZQ28pE

4
Lawjic 4 points ago +4 / -0

Really? I watched it at your request and came to the total opposite conclusion.

2
Logic20xx [S] 2 points ago +6 / -4

Lol yeah that was funny how he describes it.

-2
AlgaeBanquet -2 points ago +3 / -5

Illuminati Card Game 1996:

Flat Earthers card:

"People laugh, but the Flat Earthers know something"...

Hmmm...

2
WeAreTheWorld 2 points ago +2 / -0

I second that...

4
Fefifofumdrum 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well that doesn't make any sense, does it?

3
Ole1212 3 points ago +4 / -1

Are we talking about the Ice Wall and endless land beyond?

2
0
Logic20xx [S] 0 points ago +3 / -3

To me they all look CGI, except the one that I posted. Can you please link directly to some that you think look real?

-1
StormzAComing -1 points ago +1 / -2

It's not endless. Supposedly, there are other, wider oceans and continents beyond, in concentric rings, according to the Standard Grifter Earth Model

9
Hing 9 points ago +9 / -0

Antarctica is full of secrets. An entire continent left untouched for ScIeNcE while the rest of the planet fights for every inch of land. I can't wait to see what's there once the cabal falls.

5
Logic20xx [S] 5 points ago +6 / -1

Yeah it kind of is the #1 big no no of the world.

6
HighCountryAZ 6 points ago +7 / -1

Pics of Antarctica are suppressed because things are hidden from us. Big secrets re Antarctica, frens. And to flat Earthers, please post to your heart's content on conspiracies.win

5
Honor+Duty 5 points ago +6 / -1

Cool pic.

Interesting stuff to think about.

Don’t think this is something to even hint at with normies. We are still trying to teach them that ivermectin is good and vaccines are bad. And Trump won. By a lot.

1
Hayle 1 point ago +1 / -0

100% friend

-3
Logic20xx [S] -3 points ago +5 / -8

You're right. Just look at the nonsense replies in this thread as their heads spin out of control from just a tiny, tiny whiff of a flat Earth related picture. They're like, "Quick get the 'I'm an accredited Astronomer' cannon and fire the 30 degrees north pole vision line theory. Do NOT let any flat earth consideration into the mind!!!"

7
ILearnedToCode 7 points ago +9 / -2

You dumbass flat earthers think we have a closed mind. It is very much the opposite. I've constantly debated people on this topic over the years, watch their clips, listen to their arguments - nothing changes. The flat earth model is ridiculously unfounded. You have to be so ignorant of so many things to somehow land on a model of our earth being flat. You might bring up 1 or 2 points that kind of make sense, but theres 1000+ counter points that make a lot more sense.

Yes, people have lied to us about a lot of things. That doesnt mean the earth is flat.

4
Cabal-Bot 4 points ago +5 / -1

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2016/02/18/for-russias-church-leader-a-trip-to-antarctica-is-not-just-a-photo-op/ I’m not into the flat earth theory but there is something about Antarctica they aren’t telling us- I saved this link for 6 years now b/c I remember the speculation and theories of why he actually went there. Supposedly escorted by Russian navy ships.
Have you ever seen the video inner earth? It’s pretty cool- I’ll see if I can find it. Found it https://youtu.be/LPU-ioDCEbg 43 minutes long but it’s worth it

1
Logic20xx [S] 1 point ago +3 / -2

The Russian Church leader thing is creepy. I'll check out the inner earth thing later, thanks.

2
StormzAComing 2 points ago +3 / -1

Wait until hollow earth comes out lol

2
Logic20xx [S] 2 points ago +3 / -1

A couple of people in this thread linked me to vids. I’ll check em out.

4
PreserveMF 4 points ago +4 / -0

Whatever the shape of the earth is... probably spheroid but happy for it to be a turtle holding elephants holding the earth or what ever else.

The real question is somebody hiding land from Us?

They hide the amount of everything else, oil, gas timber. Its even starting to feel like there gonna start claiming we gotta be carful how much oxygen we use. Hiding land seems plausible.

Anyone seen the admiral bird interview about his expedition?

0
AlgaeBanquet 0 points ago +2 / -2

Yes... And yes. One of many crumbs...

3
2EyesOpen 3 points ago +4 / -1

Since your base is full of 'non-objective minds', I was wondering if you'd ask your very wise, level-headed mentor if he'd like to become my campaign manager as President of the Flat Earth Society.

To state it flatly:

I lost my former job as Smartest Man in the World and I'm looking for a suitable environment for a new career.

Remember: "Mediocre people need a chance to excel too." George W. Bush

Private Joe Bauers

https://whatthemovie.com/movie/idiocracy/character/11594-joe-bauers

3
BigRichardEnergy 3 points ago +4 / -1

Flat earth society is a shill website. It's obviously meant to make flat earth seem ridiculous. It's why it's the first result for Google. If that is your extent of research into the matter you are a terrible researcher.

2
StormzAComing 2 points ago +3 / -1

This. FES has sus connections to the Bloodlines.

1
Strelnieks 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Lead, follow, or get out of the way!"

2
2EyesOpen 2 points ago +2 / -0

lol

0
Logic20xx [S] 0 points ago +6 / -6

An embarrassing attempt to ridicule the intelligence of people whom you've never met nor even interacted with. You're like Stephen Colbert lol.

1
A_whole_nother_thing 1 point ago +2 / -1

I need to find some better sources. A lot of the geocentrism content out there is crackpot or poorly sourced. And, from what I can tell there is a lot of infighting between different camps or attacking so-called experts.

Makes it hard for someone genuinely geo-curious to satisfy his thirst for knowledge.

0
Logic20xx [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yeah I feel ya. One guy I’ve been watching and enjoying is Eric Dubay. Apparently he is not everyone’s cup of tea.

1
ghost_of_aswartz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good observation, 2eyes' comment really does read like the voice of Stephen Colbert

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +3 / -2

I'm not skeptical that there is fuckery afoot in Antarctica.

I'm commenting on statements or suppositions someone is posting.

Black spots are just black spots until data fills it.

Ideas one holds is a general indicator of one's intellect, though not absolute.

One shouldn't 'identify' with an unknown or currently unprovable belief and consider that belief their "intelligence" (person) has been 'attacked' when the idea is criticized.

Sorry you're being embarrassed.

Maybe you should move that over to a site that doesn't have skeptical review.

It isn't factual, it's mildly entertaining and gay. like Stephen Colbert.

-2
Logic20xx [S] -2 points ago +1 / -3

Ok dude

2
Wannastayfree 2 points ago +3 / -1

FE? Globe? Antarctica? As I learned and now tell the grandkids: “question everything”.

3
Logic20xx [S] 3 points ago +5 / -2

You're good to do that. I must have somehow also picked up that lesson. Most people just believe. Not 1 in a million can do the mathematics of a globe earth and the solar system. And how few have personally circumnavigated the earth? I can do the math, and I've been around world. And I still question, while these "believers" talk down to me like they're intelligent because Carl Sagan on TV told them how things work.

1
PeaceAndLovePatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thing is, they could easily PS those out if they wanted to cover it up...

1
1
Godisglory1 1 point ago +1 / -0

The cabal kept all the good resources and we the people is being hidden everything

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
PeaceAndLovePatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmmm strange

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +5 / -4

In the mentioned jfk moon speech are supposed NASA shots of a curved earth and a spheroidal earth shot from the moon. Any view of a spaceshot from the craft shows curvature of the Earth.

Also in no way does a dark spot made by a fliter in a photo suggest flat earth. Hollow? Make a case. Flat? No.

3
Canadianguy17 3 points ago +4 / -1

Hate to tell you but that view of the earth was a camera trick. They turned out the lights in the hub and filmed through it to a port hole. You're seeing a round view of one part of the land on earth, not the whole thing.

They were in Low Earth Orbit the whole time.

When they came down the astronauts didn't know they were going to be part of the fakeness. They practiced it, recorded it but thought it was just training.

When the Government and CIA presented the psyop the astonauts had to go along with it or be claimed they went insane. They would be ruined and disappeared, told they got cancer, etc.

If you can't see 1 picture of the earth from space the only logical answer is they can't get to space.

If you can't find one picture showing the curve of the earth.... it's not curved.

2
Nytridr 2 points ago +5 / -3

Any snapshot showing the curvature of the earth also miraculously shows a curved earth in front of a completely black background.. no stars, no constellations... what happens to all the lights in the sky? Miracle, not saying Earth's round or flat just saying all pics of the earth are edits or cgi

7
ThirstyLibertyTree 7 points ago +7 / -0

Exposure levels in photography easily explain this. If you exposed for the stars, the earth would be completely blown out. The stars are simply far dimmer than the sun lit earth.

5
BatteryBaron 5 points ago +5 / -0

Its all about exposure. Can you see stars during the daytime? No. Because everything else is way too bright.

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stars seen from HERE show a rotating spheroidal earth in the precession of the equanox. So....what does happen to 'the lights in the sky?' given that they have gone somewhere.

2
John_Mac_n_Cheese 2 points ago +4 / -2

I'd suggest watching the video What on Flat Earth Happened? if you haven't already. There's a lot to it. So much so that the video is over 8 hours long.

3
2EyesOpen 3 points ago +5 / -2

Can i ask one question of you?

IF - Centuries of deception, agreed upon by myriad of scientists and sailors, pilots and teachers, cartographers and travelers of all nationalities in all times.....have conspired to construct the world as a sphere and an interlocking culture behind it.

The question is: What was gained?

3
Munchaussen 3 points ago +3 / -0

And why do they stay quiet for free?…. Tupac and Elvis are really alive too… I saw the video. Holy smokes.

0
John_Mac_n_Cheese 0 points ago +2 / -2

That idk their reasoning for this does not mean that FE isn't true. But I would guess it's so they can sell us a fake alien invasion to "bring everyone together" as Reagan kept saying (NWO).

Edit: I'm linking Ball Earth with the space hoax.

Edit 2: FE is more ammo for God existing imo, while the space and Big Bang stuff is more ammo for everything being random.

1
Munchaussen 1 point ago +2 / -1

What’s more wasteful…an 8 hour video…or spending 8 hours watching it?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Logic20xx [S] 1 point ago +4 / -3

I didn’t say that anything about the photo suggests a flat earth. I said that the photo is shit. Do you agree? Why do you suppose there are no videos of Antartica? Why do you suppose the photos of Antartica are shit? What are your specific thoughts about the reason for the dark spot in the photo?

1
2EyesOpen 1 point ago +3 / -2

Until a few weeks ago, I always thought flat earth was stupid. Then I began having discussions with someone who is very wise and level headed. Not like your typical flat earther who lacks an objective mind and simply finds the idea of a flat earth scintillating. I’ve since been searching for proofs either way.

That suggests you indeed are suggesting.

I'm supposing you're supposing about 'no video of Antarctica'.

That would be one boring movie with no popular audience, hence no popular release.

Rest assured several countries have vids, pics, explorations, etc.

Secret bases? Probably. Underground tunnels? Maybe.

Old maps suggest land under the ice.

1
tomthung 1 point ago +1 / -0

is it a polaroid or is it a composite? a fake picture or a real picture.

0
SOTUisFUBAR 0 points ago +3 / -3

Their all composites/artist's perceptions of what they may look like

1
doug1956 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s getting crowded on this floor.

1
CherokeePede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks to.me like what ever algorythm they use to convert the image is 1. Limited and 2. Converting on a contrast scale. Its a big black spot because the algorythm cannot differentiaite between the billions of different whites on the scale. The staticky grey areas are that way due to the way the processor interprets the differences between the darks and lights there.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
SOTUisFUBAR 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's okay buddy. The river in Egypt is a hard one to get out of...