268
posted ago by CaptainQirk ago by CaptainQirk +268 / -0

Johnson and Johnson created one of the "vaccines".

This was at a rally for a television doctor.

Trump said that he'd see the guests "later".

I feel like maybe that's important.

Thoughts?

Further research: At around the one hour mark, he talks about Woody Johnson of "Johnson and Johnson", mentions he has a shit ton of cash, then mentions his wife Suzanne, and notes that she's from Ukraine.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woody_Johnson

He has supported RINO Republicans like McCain and Jeb, but then switched to Trump.

He was ambassador to the UK under Trump.

He described Jan 6 as "a dark day".

Okay, I'm starting to think maybe there's some truth to the idea that Trump is just highlighting Deep Staters, or that maybe he just knows how to get along with incredibly rich political opportunists.

Comments (114)
sorted by:
22
bubble_bursts [M] 22 points ago +22 / -0 stickied

Alex Gorsky took over as CEO in 2012

Joaquin Duato took over in Jan 2022

Woody Johnson was the Chairman and CEO of J&J the best I can gather at around 2006.

It looks like the Cabal did a witchhunt against him and he ended up settling and paying all the alleged taxes with a statement that his lawyers had told him that everything was consistent with the Tax Code.

Johnson married the Ukrainian wife Suzanne Ircha Johnson in 2009. My guess is something happened to take over J&J by the Cabal. I am assuming Suzanne is his handler.

Couple more tidbits

Brexit: During Johnson's tenure (as US ambassador to UK), Britain withdrew from the EU.

Johnson advised the UK government to ban Huawei from being used in the nation's 5G networks after departing Prime Minister Theresa May approved the company in early 2019.

To me Johnson looks like a good guy.

Added:

Further digging on this guy makes me think that he has been memory holed. I cannot find any article that talks about when he became CEO and when he left. Even searching on www.jnj.com, I can only find reference to his dad and his grandfather, but not to him.

If Trump is pointing out someone who has been memory holed, its Anons' duty to dig it up.

25
DrMcCoy 25 points ago +25 / -0

JOHNSON & JOHNSON COVID JAB IS NOT SAFE!

https://www.bitchute.com/video/Ix0iYXsp1WWH/

18
inquimous 18 points ago +18 / -0

No, but an interesting new trend is emerging, which will take years to confirm and understand if it continues. While the vaccinees from the mRNA vaccines, Pfizer and Moderna, are showing a rise in all-cause mortality, the ones who took the adenovirus versions, J&J and Aztra-Zeneca, are showing a decline.

26
HelloDolly 26 points ago +26 / -0

Yes, and it's interesting that the J&J is not safe thing comes on the same day as the Pfizer data dump about pregnant women. Trump has told us that Pfizer owns and controls the FDA. I think they shit on the J&J to distract from the much more dangerous MRNA shots.

7
posdnus 7 points ago +7 / -0

Agreed.

5
Phishhed44 5 points ago +5 / -0

As they were from the start of the plandemic. Note too the adenovirus versions (as far as we know) that the Chyneez & Russia use also don’t have all the massive adverse effects? Unfortunately mRna vaccines incl flu shots aren’t going anywhere any time soon!

4
Mustang289hipo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Winner Winner Chicken Dinner.

3
jb12458 3 points ago +3 / -0

I also remember Trump expressing disapproval when the J&J was pulled, so that might fit with your hypothesis.

10
WentFishing 10 points ago +10 / -0

The J&J genetic mod shot still does use mrna, it differs in how it introduces the mrna into your cells. It uses a modified adenovirus spliced with "Sars CoV-2") to introduce directions for spike proteins. It supposedly does not use the direct "lipid particle" (graphene oxide and Luciferese enzyme) the others do, but is by no means "safe".

It is interesting the CDC removed it's approval after 54 for hospitalized and nine died from blood clots, and Pfizer and Moderna do not have this issue. These fake news demons:

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/cdc-panel-recommends-people-not-get-jj-vaccine-pfizer-moderna-availabl-rcna8987

3
Phishhed44 3 points ago +3 / -0

I see you caught a mess of crappie?!! 😂

4
WentFishing 4 points ago +4 / -0

Man, you don't know a fraction of it! Tell you over a brew (or ginger ale) sometime!

2
Phishhed44 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’d dig that. Or on my retrofitted bass boat? 😎👍🏼

2
Joys1Daughter 2 points ago +2 / -0

My frens are keklarious! 🐸

2
DrMcCoy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know. Makes me mad. And Moderna and Pfizer do cause clots also.

1
PaulRevere01 1 point ago +1 / -0

Umm it wasnt jnj it was from doe and dod.i beg to differ and state that is propaganda but out by our advasaries. Even tho im all out against vaxx and the medical industrial complex. 07 tips hat.

1
CharismaDeye 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just noticed I got my discord disabled. Was that bc of your server?

1
PaulRevere01 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dont think so they purged so many. Myself inc. was such a small server my guess is they tracked everyone thought our phones, ect.

23
Everydaypast 23 points ago +23 / -0

Not sure how relevant this is but ain't J&J one of the jabs that aren't full-out mrna treatments?

At the time, I thought the MSM coverage of J&J side effects during early stage of the pandemic was a cabal initiative to push off any alternative jab that ain't mrna.

24
ThisIsHowItStarts 24 points ago +25 / -1

Yes this is true Johnson and Johnson is not an mRNA vaccine. That’s why they’re hitting them hard and trying to get them shut down. It doesn’t fit the narrative, it doesn’t fit their plan, so they want to get rid of them.

9
AussieSpectator 9 points ago +9 / -0

In Australia we had only the j&j available for the first few months then we had the national mainstream scandal where the mainstream said they were dangerous because of blot clotting so we need to get the Pfizer ones asap.

So now all the normies here beg to get pfizer over any others, also pfizer is only given to people under 50 all the old people get J&J/astrazenica.

Make of it what you will. I for one find it strange that the establishment would for the 1st time say vaccines are dangerous (after decades of "harmless, safe and effective) only to promote the mrna vaccines as the solution.

4
Everydaypast 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly what stood out to me.

It was shocking that the MSM would be the first to present the "dangerous" idea that a vaccine could not be "safe and effective".

Which lead me to believe mrna was an important milestone for this scamdemic.

Ofc this could be part of a cabal show of playing both sides but I lean more towards my initial assessment.

2
Phishhed44 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interestingly you’d THINK that if the EU wasn’t cabal controlled they’d have cooked-up their own vaccine? Just goes to show…

1
ThisIsHowItStarts 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed

13
HardWorkinPatriot 13 points ago +13 / -0

It's not MNRAS, but my son got it for his job and he did not want the MNRA. He got sick after he got it, and he got quite sick about 4-6 weeks later. They said it was covid. The J&J is just another version of the bullshit fake vaccine.

9
JessWithTheMess 9 points ago +9 / -0

Thank you, we got people accepting this jab as possibly non-dangerous just because the CEO was at the rally.

13
Qlue 13 points ago +13 / -0

Imagine how wishy-washy a person must be to flip on the vaccines just because someone showed up somewhere.

5
horseyPatriot 5 points ago +5 / -0

Friends with medical and biochemistry advanced degrees have been researching the vaccines and Covid since the beginning. J&J causes body to produce spike proteins.

4
WentFishing 4 points ago +4 / -0

The J&J is mRNA, it just introduces mRNA in a different form. All of these mod shots are just slightly different (experimental) versions of the same evil. I'm sorry about your son, hope he is well.

4
flopperdog 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not endorsing the J&J, but I got it early on (April, 2021) with no side-effects thus far.

2
GetsTheNogginJoggin 2 points ago +2 / -0

It definitely has the lower side effect profile of the current options.

1
Phishhed44 1 point ago +1 / -0

Glad you’re ok Fren?

2
Everydaypast 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh don't get me wrong I'm not endorsing the spike protein riddled J&J in even the slightest but it seems like pushing mrna is an important objective for the cabal.

7
Scorpion76 7 points ago +7 / -0

Correct J&J wasn't MRNA.

9
bubble_bursts 9 points ago +9 / -0

No, but it uses Adenovirus, and encodes Spike protein genetically. As ar as I am concerned, its the same shit.

6
PhDinNY 6 points ago +6 / -0

That has been my understanding all along, that the "front end" of the shots may be different, the end result is essentially the same. For this reason, I won't get any of the shots, ever (especially considering that they were designed for the first version of covid), and I'll be 65 this year. (and I had covid, which is one more reason not to get any of the shots :) )

3
WentFishing 3 points ago +3 / -0

It uses mRNA inside an adenovirus modified with "Sars Cov-2" to introduces instructions on creating spike proteins via the mRNA in the adenovirus.

It was a lie that J&J is not mRNA, they just use an indirect system ( instead of the direct nano-lipid injections of the others. Nano-lipid meaning a hydrogel containing graphene oxide and Luciferese enzyme.

2
WentFishing 2 points ago +2 / -0

It uses mRNA inside an adenovirus modified with "Sars Cov-2" to introduces instructions on creating spike proteins via the mRNA in the adenovirus.

It was a lie that J&J is not mRNA, they just use an indirect system ( instead of the direct nano-lipid injections of the others. Nano-lipid meaning a hydrogel containing graphene oxide and Luciferese enzyme.

2
bubble_bursts 2 points ago +2 / -0

I vaguely remembered it was something like this, thanks for clarifying

2
WentFishing 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wrong, it introduces mRNA in a dirrent form.

https://www.livemint.com/science/health/how-is-johnson-johnson-vaccine-different-from-other-coronavirus-vaccines-11614678596482.html

This is just one random article of many. It was lie, like every other. See my other comments.

3
WentFishing 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, they are not "direct mRNA injections, nut introduce mRNA within modified adenovirsus. See my comment above Do not be fooled that these slightly different poisons are "safe".

14
BetterNameUnfound 14 points ago +18 / -4

Remember:

Trump endorsements tell us where to dig.

13
deleted 13 points ago +14 / -1
5
RugerP89 5 points ago +6 / -1

Understand that Media blockbusters all contain Comms written by Comms Aware for the Comms Aware. Aka 0.1% of those tuning into the Simpsons or Spy-der Man: No Way Home etc. But they still do it.

Sending a message to fellow Comms-Aware Patriots (typically embedded in agencies and businesses) or making threats to Comms-Aware Clowns (typically embedded in agencies and businesses) is deemed SO important, that it is worth puzzling Pittsburgh suburbanites over.

GAW racking their brain trying to decode such matters is a bonus. But Q isn't relying on that "We may have Overestimated your abilities".

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
Joys1Daughter 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe you are on target u/RugerP89.

Since he had not previously mentioned them, at least recently, I was blindsided when POTUS mentioned Johnson and his Ukrainian wife and thought immediately, what are the comms?

When Q made that statement I remember feeling ignorant and depressed as through I'd horribly disappointed my favorite Mentor.

It was crushing.

3
PhDinNY 3 points ago +3 / -0

My fear is that Trump got "buttered up" by the RINOs, and that's why he endorsed them. Trump appears to be dangerously subject to flattery.

1
Joys1Daughter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't be deceived.

POTUS does nothing by accident. 50 steps ahead. When this is over it will be revealed that POTUS is the greatest actor that ever lived.

POTUS is NOT manipulated. He is The Manipulator.

0
BetterNameUnfound 0 points ago +1 / -1

98% of the people at those rallies won't see Frazzledrip either.

Dig.

8
InmatesRunTheAsylum 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is the ONLY thing that even begins to make sense.

1
Buttery 1 point ago +2 / -1

So where to dig on JD Vance? Something to do with his name being given as JD Mandel?

1
WentFishing 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have an interesting theory that I'm looking into, much is based on my other comments in this thread.

13
Hope70 13 points ago +13 / -0

Trump labeled him as a “friend”. I am surprised no one booed him out-Johnson and Johnson Covid Shot. Johnson and Johnson was not given full FDA approval due to blood clot risks. Only to be given to those over 18, if they can’t take the Moderna or Pfizer. No one should take ANY of these shots. Efficacy of 12% and only for 1 week is the latest release information! Why take it if it is: EUA; has many side effects, including death; efficacy is so low; there are alternatives to the shot(ivermectin, hydrochloroquine, quercitin with zinc, Vitamin C and D-preventative; high recovery rate>99% in those with no comorbidities?

2
ThisIsHowItStarts 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who? What friend?

2
Hope70 2 points ago +2 / -0

I though Trump said he was a friend of Trump’s. He gave his name, but I didn’t catch it. Now friend could mean 2 things: 1) a longtime acquaintance from New York business and social circles or a golfing body or 2) an acquaintance working with him with operation warp speed.

0
WentFishing 0 points ago +1 / -1

Interesting, the CDC withdrew their support after 54 were hospitalized, 9 died, due to blood clots which, they say, Moderna and Pfizer have no issue with. Can these demons lie more?

https://www.livemint.com/science/health/how-is-johnson-johnson-vaccine-different-from-other-coronavirus-vaccines-11614678596482.html

11
undine53 11 points ago +11 / -0

Puzzling, as is his endorsement of Dr Oz.

5
cyberrigger 5 points ago +5 / -0

Pence is against it so it must be good.

4
undine53 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bluff and counter bluff?

9
photobuf 9 points ago +9 / -0

J&J vaccine was created the old fashion way of making vaccines. That is why it was pulled from the market after 5 people had a reaction---which is not unusual for any vaccine with thousands getting it. What is unusual is the mRNA vaccines created by an untested technology was given to millions and the adverse reactions of those people that got jabbed was hidden by the FDA and the CDC. Much deception and corruption. We are just sheep and cattle to them. Obama admitted that billions were given an EXPERIMENTAL vaccine. Let that sink in!

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
1
NanoKhuma 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, it wasn't, J&J is viral vector, NOT the old hat live-attenuated or deactivated vaccines. J&J still requires you to inject genetic code to make spike proteins, just with a slightly different delivery mechanism than Pfizer or Moderna's nano-lipid bubbles.

1
ViaToil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course the JnJ was noticed by all. Made me pause and think a lil more, same with Oz. Trump seemed rather solid on both cases, both cases as well.. Well lets see, Oz has been under attack from both sides, sort of weirdly so and JnJ has been "picked on" by the mrna groups since the shots started, when ever a problem came up "JnJ was the only one that made negative news in the mainstream" Even when it proved that it was not anything specific to that one companies "vaccine". OP is correct, digging and connections suggested here.

0
2
ViaToil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Johnson & Johnson and AstraZeneca use a harmless version of a cold virus as a vector to give our cells the instructions they need to make the coronavirus's spike protein.

OOh, so YES, totally not what the Globohomo's are doing with their experimental dna monstrosity.

3
photobuf 3 points ago +3 / -0

YEP BUT i am still not taking it! kekedy KEK

3
PaulRevere01 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shadilay.

8
GreenLivesMatter 8 points ago +10 / -2

Trump seems fucking weird sometimes. He appointed a lot of shitty people.

3
horseyPatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Keep your enemies close?

6
DagnyDocket 6 points ago +6 / -0

Watch the wives. He mentioned Suzanne Johnson from Ukraine, seems she narrowly missed being killed on 9/11 and is a friend of Melania. He also heaped praise on Oz’s wife alluding to how great a first lady she’ll make. Who is she? Lisa Lemole, sister Laura is married into DuPonts.

Source: https://www.cnbc.com/2022/04/19/2022-elections-dr-oz-has-close-ties-to-the-du-pont-family-heirs-and-theyre-backing-his-senate-run.html

And why did Trump select Oz over McCormick when McCormick’s wife worked for him while president? From a CNN article:

His [McCormick’s] wife, Dina Powell McCormick, was a top national security aide for Trump in the White House. And a number of trusted Trump aides -- including Hope Hicks and Stephen Miller -- had signed on to help McCormick's campaign.

Source: https://www.cnn.com/2022/04/09/politics/trump-mehmet-oz-endorsement-pennsylvania/index.html

Last night’s rally felt different to me in tone by a lot. I know some felt it was lower energy, but I felt like the crowd was more raucous, if that makes sense? Or that Trump indulged the crowd more often and longer for chants of “lock her up” etc. He also said Woody Johnson wanted to attend but he said no, wait for a nicer day, iirc.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
MatildaJ 5 points ago +10 / -5

45s MO. He brings them into the limelight, they lap it up and then they get comfortable, then cocky, then they let their guard down and the ‘real’ person steps forward and reveals their true self. And 45 steps back as these scum realise they’ve been had, hook, line and sinker. Think Fauci.

9
deleted 9 points ago +11 / -2
1
MatildaJ 1 point ago +2 / -1

Relax. Pearl clutching is so liberal.

1
Buttery 1 point ago +2 / -1

Do you have any examples besides Fauci? Preferably one where the "true self" was revealed that revelation harmed them.

4
Imin-theinternet 4 points ago +4 / -0

j&j may have been the "not all vaccines are bad" and not the black hats are taking it out. As for oz idk, it could be just be a pawn. Oz is dirty, and known to be. So why bring someone like that into your circle unless you have alternative motive? If that is the case, what is that motive then?

5
Hope70 5 points ago +5 / -0

The only thing that can explain Trump's endorsement is that they made a deal with him and he is under the white hats watchful eye because I believe he is dirty: dual citizenship-voted in Turkey, but not in the US 2018 election reportedly; married into the Asplund tree Service family-hired illegals to work, circumvented OSHA guidelines reportedly and now being fined multi million dollars; member of the WEF; supportive of the Left and their stance on major issues-leading voters to believe he is a RINO.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
outofstep 2 points ago +2 / -0

Perhaps Trump's endorsement of Oz isn't because Oz is so great, but because David McCormick is a worse candidate and Trump is endorsing someone that will be able to beat McCormick?

There's probably a good reason that Trump isn't endorsing McCormick. I'm sure that he knows a lot more about McCormick than the general public knows about McCormick.

1
Hope70 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe he is a RINO because it is my opinion, I don’t have proof in hand, WEF member, good with lockdowns, prior Democrat. He is a good example why I feel you shouldn’t hold dual citizenship. You can only have allegiance to one country. He reportedly voted in 2018 Turkish elections, but didn’t bother to vote in the U.S. His In laws are corrupt hiring illegals and breaking OSHA regulations fo a buck. To me that right there is a conflict of interest with big business. I think Trump has something on him and made a deal. He knew he was well liked in entertainment, and felt promoting someone who was liked would get him in Congress and a sure vote. If he doesn’t vote the way he needs to, the white hats will put him.

4
Narg 4 points ago +5 / -1

Sounds like it's leading up to something. Capitulation to the White Hats? Opening Day at the big Gitmo Festival of Justice? Something else entirely?

"He works in mysterious ways, his wonders to perform." With a lower-case "his" this does seem to fit our President

10
CaptainQirk [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

Mm, but I would be wary of even vaguely deifying him, and that's as a guy who has memed around the GEOTUS stuff.

The anti-Christ performs many wonders and signs.

Is it possible that the goal is to get a Vax company head on-side, get a TV Doctor with an audience on side, and then expose a version of the truth, even of it's framed as "Rogue agents within these companies falsified data and misled politicians and CEOs, we here at Johnson and Johnson apologize to the people"

Still a shitty chain of events, but I'm trying to reconcile this shit in my head.

6
Narg 6 points ago +6 / -0

I really have no idea what is happening with Oz, the J&J guy, or plenty of other things Trump arranges, but I do trust the man. And after more than half a decade of watching him in his first Administration and since, seeing the surprising and positive outcomes he was able to achieve despite every damn organization and politician in America fighting him (only a slight exaggeration), I'm sure something good will come from his spotlighting these men. I just don't know what it will be.

As for the suggestive wording, I did give some thought to that but felt the saying really did fit, and I'm pretty sure Trump is no Anti-Christ. I knew some would be uncomfortable with it, though. So was I but only a little.

2
CaptainQirk [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's fair.

2
Letsroll2021 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like this possibility very much. Like you, I have been trying to make Oz fit in this crazy puzzle.

5
CaptainQirk [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

Again, just a theory. Let's not get too comfortable with our theories.

Always question!

2
tweety51A 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe more like a magician pulling a rabbit out of a hat.

3
InmatesRunTheAsylum 3 points ago +3 / -0

I heard it and it definitely made me scratch my head. There were a couple of other businesses and/or people that he mentioned that also were not options in my book. Even though Oz is saying the right things, my gut doesn't believe him.

I'm wondering if the moral of this "movie" is trust nobody.

3
Phishhed44 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even tho some of his chess moves seem sketchy, I fully believe everything’s planned from every angle and there’s purpose in the Plan behind them. Gotta be; he’s too dang intelligent to make wrong decisions intentionally.

2
Joys1Daughter 2 points ago +2 / -0

THIS 👆

POTUS is ALWAYS 50 steps ahead.

2
Wigsrip 2 points ago +2 / -0

Woody Johnson is part of the J&J family but does not hold a position there. President Trump "misspoke" (probably on purpose). Woody Johnson owns the NY Jets and was Trump's Ambassador to the UK. https://news.yahoo.com/trump-ambassador-uk-cleared-making-203004306.html

1
crazycloud2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know why you say no one is talking about it, I am seeing so damn many stories of people talking about it is silly. Almost all of the reports say no one is talking about it.

1
PhDinNY 1 point ago +1 / -0

No worries, as their ads say, J&J is "a family company" :)

1
yeldarb1983 1 point ago +1 / -0

well, there's that, but I also find it interesting that J&J seems to be the media's favorite fall guy when the vaccines don't behave like they're 'supposed' to...

1
ThinQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's also co-owner of the NFL's NY Jets.

He could be DS, but I'm not so sure. It sounds more like he is/was staunch Republican, but may have moved to MAGA. While ambassador to the UK it sounds like the DS was running a smear campaign on him (allegations of sexual harassment, racism) when he started calling out some of the embassy staff as being anti-Trump. That sounds more WH to me.

He was against 5G/Huawei (in the UK, presumably in USA as well) citing security concerns. Under the wiki Agriculture section, it appears he was a proponent for chlorinated chicken and hormone-fed beef (in trade matters). I'm not educated enough on these agricultural matters to form an opinion on them as yet.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woody_Johnson

.

Now, his brother Christopher, who he co-owns the Jets with, has scant info on him. With regards to the NFL kneeling issue, CJ kept middle-of-the-road saying he'd prefer the players stand for the anthem, but was not going to infringe on their freedom of expression. (My take... All that needs to happen for evil to grow is for good men to do nothing). He married Doris Wong in 2018 (don't know anything about her).

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Johnson_(American_football_executive)

.

Interestingly, CJ and Woody have a sister and then two brothers who died. Keith and Billy, one from a cocaine overdose, the other from a motorcycle accident. Woody also lost a child to disease.

.

Now their father, Robert, has one interesting familial tie, this to Gloria Vanderbilt. It's not a solid link, but his aunt was married to a guy who, after their divorce, married Vanderbilt. Also from wiki...

... His paternal grandfather was Robert Wood Johnson I, one of the three brothers who founded Johnson & Johnson. His aunt Evangeline married composer Leopold Stokowski (after they divorced in 1937,[6] he married Gloria Vanderbilt)[7][8] and his uncle John Seward Johnson I founded the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution. His maternal grandfather was Millard Fillmore Ross.[3]..."

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Wood_Johnson_III

.

Further down the rabbit hole, this conductor Stokowski (featured on the Disney Fantasia movie), who was married to Vanderbilt for ten years before divorcing, was also married to someone born with the last name Hickenlooper in TX. Isn't that the name of a current politician? CO democrat senator, not sure if there's any connection.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopold_Stokowski

.

Cc: u/bubble_bursts (some digging)

1
ThisIsHowItStarts 1 point ago +1 / -0

What’s the name of the person, and where were they supposed to be on stage in the audience? People have been mentioning this but it’s so vague nobody has any sauce so I’m just going to sit on it. I’ve tried to ask other posters information but nobody seems to be able to get anything to me.

3
CaptainQirk [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

At around the one hour mark, he talks about Woody Johnson of Johnson and Johnson, mentions he has a shit ton of cash, then mentions his wife Suzanne, and notes that she's from Ukraine.

1
ThisIsHowItStarts 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK so was Woody Johnson supposed to be there, is his wife there?

1
ThisIsHowItStarts 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK so for everybody’s help, Woody Johnson from Johnson and Johnson is not the CEO of the company. However he was there, and some mention about his wife being from Ukraine. I’m just wondering what kind of Comms that is. The world may never know.

Also this is kind of interesting because Johnson and Johnson‘s been in the news this week. They’re trying to stop that vaccine. Which I find interesting, because it’s the only one that’s not an mRNA. I think they want to get rid of Johnson & Johnson vaccine, because they want us to use Pfizer in Moderna. I don’t think the Johnson & Johnson is causing blood clots at all to be perfectly honest.

My mom is actually a biologist. I know that’s kind of a joke right now, but she did all the research on the three vaccines. Of the three, the Johnson & Johnson would have been The one that she would recommend if somebody absolutely had to take it.

2
CaptainQirk [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I couldn't remember his name off the top of my head, I'm rewatching the whole rally to get you the name. Trump did mention it.

Give me a little while. :)

1
ThisIsHowItStarts 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks captain appreciate it

1
probablyacoincidence 1 point ago +2 / -1

I personally feel that while Trump is the single best political personality in my lifetime that he is totally not perfect. In light of Q and a larger plan and our constant search for comms and truth i think sometimes we get a little carried away in every nuance being planned and every single solitary thing being something more. Personally i have struggled with some of his personnel and some of the people he is friends with and promotes. I think some of them arent good, and wont do right by America etc. Personally i think Dr Oz is a disaster, lots of weird overlapping associations and i dont think Oz is truly America first. I think Trump gravitates towards people who like him and promote him and is not always aware of their full past and possible issues with their decisions in the future. And how could he? How much time does one man have to autistically deep dive into every single person he associates with? I think as always we have to use our judgement and evaluate and still support him. Most of his choices are good, many of his judicial picks have been amazing at the lower levels. Supreme court picks for me have been a disaster 2/3. I think Gorsuch is mostly solid and Barret and Kavanagh are a huge disappointment. So all of that to say, he could be friends with people and they could still be not good people. If i am being conspiratorial the fact that the media is now trying to squash the JJ vaccine and promote the other disasters actually lends credence to the possibility that that one is not the same as the others and is not under the thumb of the deep state ulterior motive crowd. Time will tell but stay vigilent

1
CQVFEFE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does anyone have a link to Trump's speech last night? RSBN's youtube and rumble channels don't seem to have it - Rumble offering only Oz and D'Souza?

Wonder why RSBN on youtube had a live stream of it yesterday, and is advertising the next one in Casper WY, but no link to watch the rally last night

Thanks in advance :)

1
davidwilcox 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ignored because it doesn't fit with my worldview.

1
PaulRevere01 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look Colt 45 turned JnJ why cause he knows the future and what JnJ are gonna due with contact lenses. Id say double down in jnj with gold and your families future will be financially bright. Even tho its progress i believe colt 45 has it covered!!!

1
hisnamewassethrich17 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought J and J was the ‘good’ vax. Trump endorsed it and MSM discredited it every step of the way.

-1
WeAreTheBadGuys -1 points ago +1 / -2

Trump still has my support but not at 2016 levels.