352
Comments (27)
sorted by:
13
Delphi373 13 points ago +13 / -0

Government anything is pathetic. I’m not surprised. Remember Obama’s pathetic healthcare site that kept crashing? You think they care about VAERS? They just pretend to care - it’s all optics. Government systems are the worst - there’s no incentive to make them good.

5
polish_snausage 5 points ago +5 / -0

I read somewhere that Obama's website cost more that our WALL at the southern border

5
2020voter 5 points ago +5 / -0

Kinda like my local DMV....

5
VetforTrump 5 points ago +6 / -1

370 million didn't take the shot. So they only worry about the 50 million who did.

2
MikeWho 2 points ago +2 / -0

A lot more than 50 million took it.

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not sure it's much more than that. Seems I can't find many who took it.

1
MikeWho 1 point ago +1 / -0

At my place of employment, 15 have taken it, 3 have not. I'm in the service department and I visit clients homes on a daily basis. I'd estimate its around 70% of people who have taken it.

1
DickAllcocks 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are pushing for everyone to take it. You’d think they’d be better prepared if science or safety was the issue.

4
FrostedCricketFlakes 4 points ago +4 / -0

The injections are still in their experimental stage. They should be cataloguing any and all possible side effects, if this was actually about science.

4
Moose_Antlers 4 points ago +4 / -0

FDA is actually under federal law to do precisely that. As part of the EUAs, the drug manufacturers are also required by law to maintain an accurate and up-to-date database of drug side effects. They've tried to skirt it by 1) keeping it proprietary and never publishing the data, 2) making the reporting process so arcane and lengthy that no one in their right mind completes it. You have to be on a mission to demand accountability to jump through all the hoops.

This is data manipulation in real time so they can claim it's safer than it actually is because that's what their broken, incomplete data set shows. This gives them a window of plausible deniability to claim they're complying with federal law, while actually doing nothing of the sort. It's like that 55 years FDA wanted to release Pfizer's study data they evaluated in a little over a month and deemed sufficient for a high-profile EUA.

2
DickAllcocks 2 points ago +2 / -0

They should have already been pulled

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

They should destroy any remaining shots and never give them again.

The only experiment is waiting to see who dies.

4
Archon69 4 points ago +4 / -0

In 2006, Wikiquote dug up such a source: The Memoirs of Stalin’s Former Secretary by Boris Bazhanov, published in 2002. Translated from the Russian, the version which, according to Bazhanov, was uttered in 1923 by Stalin in reference to a vote in the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, was this:

“I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how.”

2
P900 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is all that really matters!!!

3
nonrate 3 points ago +3 / -0

That should be enough people for a normal vaccine. Goes to show how deadly the covid potions are.

2
retardmonkey 2 points ago +2 / -0

Think on context. Before the clotshot 50 employees for data entry was probably overkill.

2
Cpleb 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be fair they did say that the Covid adverse effects was more than all the years for all the vaccines that vaers collected for …so 50? Maybe they never needed that many people to handle the volume.

2
muhqtardtho 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty good point. Also willing to bet they're more interested in highering/training all of those IRS employees they need over something that would cost them not just money but their grip on the narrative, because of course those IRS employees would be doing the complete opposite.

1
valley-lily 1 point ago +1 / -0

No wonder they only have 16,000 deaths entered.

1
DickAllcocks 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is fucking insane

1
Sadness 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the statistics are six months behind, then there is no data to force the next jab. The truth is they don't know what the deaths and injuries actually are, because the data s six months or older.

2
Cpleb 2 points ago +2 / -0

The truth is they don’t care

1
SkiSkiUSMC 1 point ago +1 / -0

My friend doesn’t even trust the vaers data no matter what I show him. He says it’s because anyone can report on there. Yet the punishment for false reports is a felony charge. So for him it’s easy to believe that all those people would risk felony charges just to push a vaccine is bad agenda but it’s not easy to believe that the dems would risk felony charges just to commit election fraud. The worst part is the dems are on video in multiple states committing the fraud!!! How do I get through to this guy??

1
DrFatsides 1 point ago +1 / -0

It makes sense. This is a small amount of money spread out by 5 years. https://www.g2xchange.com/statics/cdc-awards-21m-vaccine-adverse-events-reporting-system-task-to-gdit/

1
MrJibaku 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not a bug but a feature; it is in their best interest to update the site as slow as possible.

1
SuckaFree 1 point ago +1 / -0

VAERS was never meant to be a massive govt entity. That's why it has a self reporting option. If It's and the people managed it right, it wouldn't be so ineffective as a disease marker tracking program.

1
P900 1 point ago +1 / -0

If all that is true than the real numbers must be astronomical!!!

With such a major shift in employment and lockdowns it would be very easy to overlook casual acquaintances that have that taken a dirt nap. If everything was normal and stable we would be very on top of who has died or has had detrimental consequences from the depopulation jabs. That was probably one of the major reasons to bring on so much chaos.