441
Comments (79)
sorted by:
38
TNBanjoMan 38 points ago +38 / -0

Wouldn't that be wonderful?

17
saltyviewer123 17 points ago +17 / -0

But who is going to arrest the FBI?

28
dgfdhgfh 28 points ago +29 / -1

US marshals?

21
saltyviewer123 21 points ago +21 / -0

(Deputy Samuel Gerard) I guess I'll take over your investigation. On authority of Gov. of Illinois of the US Marshals Office 5th district of northern Illinois.

Listen up Ladies and Gentleman, Our fugitive has been on the run for 2 years and 90 minutes. Average foot speed over uneven ground is, barring injury is 4 miles an hour, that gives us a radius of 6 miles around DC. What I want out of each one of you is a hard target search of every gas station, residence, warehouse, farm house, cat house, hen house, out house, and dog house in that area. Checkpoints go up in 15 miles. Your fugitives name is Dr Fauci. Go get em!

5
Captainzoomer 5 points ago +5 / -0

You forgot bath house.

2
saltyviewer123 2 points ago +2 / -0

You make a good point. I can't believe I totally forgot that.

12
GDZeus 12 points ago +12 / -0

That would be my guess

5
polish_snausage 5 points ago +5 / -0

US citizens will eventually take action, and they will be running on pure adrenaline and emotion, if something isn't done soon.

Law & Order needs to be brought back soon or it will be decided by the mob

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
2
TNBanjoMan 2 points ago +2 / -0

"The military is the only way." -- Q

1
SoMuchWinning45 1 point ago +3 / -2

They're gonna be arrested? Why?

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
1
SoMuchWinning45 1 point ago +1 / -0

I meant that we should proceed to the only fitting sentencing.

9
N0rds 9 points ago +9 / -0

Have you not been paying attention?!? They are corrupt as fuck, cover up for pedophiles, instigate shootings and killing incidents, etc...

1
SoMuchWinning45 1 point ago +1 / -0

I meant that we should proceed to the only fitting sentencing.

4
Trumpternal 4 points ago +4 / -0

Where have you been the last 5 years?

1
SoMuchWinning45 1 point ago +1 / -0

I meant that we should proceed to the only fitting sentencing.

1
MisprisionIsEvil 1 point ago +1 / -0

False flags.

Covering up crimes including but not limited to murder, human trafficking, child porn, framing innocent people, treason, terrorism.

1
SoMuchWinning45 1 point ago +1 / -0

It was a poorly taken joke. I'd rather skip the arrested part.

19
OXRanger 19 points ago +19 / -0

IMO. . .cutting loose about 50 to 100 indictments would be a great plot twist to the movie! There would be some squealing!

19
bubble_bursts [S] 19 points ago +19 / -0

I can imagine a TV show broadcasted on every channel everywhere, with a lottery machine where you spin it around, get some kids to take out a ball, and then show the number to everyone.

"Number 62. I wonder who it will be. Lets take a look." says the jovial host (Maybe Mel Gibson or Ricky Gervais can do this), and then in the back there are boards with curtains drawn in front of each. Focus on the one that says "62" and then with great fan fare, you draw the curtain - and you will see the biggest crime summarised there.

Now comes the phone in session where people can phone in and take a guess as to who it is. The first person to guess it right will gets some asset siezed from that person. Now they will show all the assets siezed from this criminal and have a segment talking about the value and how many people they killed to earn all that, etc.

Finally there will be a quick trial and then they select a person from the audience to volunteer to press the lever.

11
MoLibertyson 11 points ago +11 / -0

Now that's a creative imagination. I jealous as hell Bubbles.

3
wideawakeuk 3 points ago +3 / -0

You were born for this moment..

1
inquimous 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's a TV show I would actually watch.

18
captn_crunch 18 points ago +18 / -0

Clinton Campaign or FBI.

Why not both?

13
bubble_bursts [S] 13 points ago +13 / -0

The article also talks about how Durham is looking at two baskets - Clinton and FBI and both will happen. He just predicts the next one will be FBI. Maybe they have to take turns, lol

4
CokeOrPepe 4 points ago +4 / -0

Who will prosecute the FBI exactly?

11
bubble_bursts [S] 11 points ago +11 / -0

Durham will indict those in FBI who are guilty, and at that point they will have to resign or get fired. Then Durham's team will prosecute - just like Meuller did with Manafort for example.

6
ghost_of_aswartz 6 points ago +6 / -0

Nearly every agency has a federal police enforcement division. This list will absolutely surprise you

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States_federal_law_enforcement_agencies

2
bigsix 2 points ago +2 / -0

USDA SWAT team? LOL

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
NeoDragoon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Huh, I could have swore that prisons fell under the mandate of the US Marshalls Service.

5
tilt_shift_neon 5 points ago +5 / -0

To effectively pursue an organization like the FBI you would have to get many low level people (and some higher) to flip in exchange for immunity to go after the real targets. Once you get that ball rolling, lots of damage can be done.

Also, as much as I despise the current FBI, it is massively unlikely that the conspiracy is 'large.' Just lots of people taking orders from the person above them.

1
ravonaf 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are both the same thing.

13
BasedCitizen 13 points ago +13 / -0

Do it!!

10
p8riot 10 points ago +10 / -0

Incoming "Durham" false flag with people in Durham masks and crew cuts holding up banks nationwide

5
Shazxofshadilay 5 points ago +5 / -0

Life could be swing

4
SoMuchWinning45 4 points ago +4 / -0

Stop, an erection lasting more than 4 hours is dangerous.

4
Donutterrian 4 points ago +4 / -0

That would be the best Christmas present ever.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
CounterStrike 3 points ago +3 / -0

Please let it be so.

3
depLORIb1e 3 points ago +3 / -0

Geotus said we'd be very happy at Christmas.....

3
bubble_bursts [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

And there was the tweet from Dan with 11.3 pointing to christmas ...

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
ouphe 0 points ago +2 / -2

Let's hope this Christmas they don't blow up more telco buildings

3
ghost_of_aswartz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sweet mother Jesus. Excitement intensifies.

3
TruuthSeeker 3 points ago +3 / -0

HARD AS WOOOOD

2
normalstreet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sweet boner, bro.

2
TruuthSeeker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Want to touch it?

No homo

3
EllipticCurveBall 3 points ago +3 / -0

My hopium is threw the roof today

3
lovecymru 3 points ago +3 / -0

🚽 💩 down

2
ReorderPoint 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tick tock…

2
Yomama44 2 points ago +2 / -0

Cool, but who is enforcing things?

2
bubble_bursts [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Huh?

1
Yomama44 1 point ago +1 / -0

Meaning even if wrong doing is found, who will enforce things?

1
bubble_bursts [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Durham has the ability to prosecute independant of the rest of DOJ, just like Meuller did. Also, once the people are indicted, they would resign / be fired. The rest of the FBI/DOJ will then have to co-operate with the prosecution, unless they want to be targeted as well.

However, most of these indictments Durham is dropping right now are not aimed just at the targets of these indictments. Each indictment opens up a pathway to target higher ups.

1
SirRupert 1 point ago +1 / -0

The FBI is about to lose its Capital ratings. Now just fbi.

1
FormerLibtard94 1 point ago +1 / -0

I really think Durham is not a person but an operation. How can you Clinton someone who doesn’t exist? It’s genius. Yes, I’m aware there are photos of him. But there are also Twitter bots with AI generated photos as well. How about a video?

1
ToeBlake34 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bring the pain!

1
RoloTomassi1723 1 point ago +1 / -0

Take your time

1
xbonesny 1 point ago +1 / -0

I for one would like to see some televised event like "Running Man".....with a gameshow host like Richard Dawson but someone more current....like James Woods

1
BirchTBarlow 1 point ago +1 / -0

So is Strozk cooperating or not? The fact that he's making these statements in the media would suggest he is not.

2
bubble_bursts [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am sure he is co-operating. He is probably making these statements to keep the others on their toes and to ensure they cant guess who is talking and who isnt

1
NeedMoarPillows 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would he do that?

1
MisprisionIsEvil 1 point ago +1 / -0

Self preservation.

1
lsvogel 1 point ago +1 / -0

Quote from the article; JOHN SOLOMON: There’s no doubt there is activity inside the grand jury right now aimed at looking at top-level officials of the FBI, and it’s based on this evidence. We all look at the fact that Denchenko was interviewed by the FBI on January 17, and disowned a lot of the things that were said to him.

Q Post #3990 4/28/2020

https://qanon.pub/?q=FBI%20CHAIN%20OF%20COMMAND%20MIDYEAR

1
mrsray 1 point ago +1 / -0

next target? what happened with the first target(s)

2
bubble_bursts [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

You might need to go back and check the stickied posts yesterday. Its beautiful how everything is en-meshing together.

1
mrsray 1 point ago +1 / -0

how about sharing what i missed then

2
bubble_bursts [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Each indictment and the associated document dump opens up new targets. It also opens up information related to previous cases that was not available. The targets are not themselves the focal point, but rather expanding to higher ups.

2
NeedMoarPillows 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's a damn good question.

0
NeedMoarPillows 0 points ago +1 / -1

I have a strong feeling this Durham stuff will drag out until the 2022 elections then just fizzle out.

2
bubble_bursts [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ah you again. The recurring question I keep asking: What are you doing here again?

0
NeedMoarPillows 0 points ago +2 / -2

Ahh, the push to censor questions, it makes me ask what YOU are doing here?

1
bubble_bursts [S] 1 point ago +2 / -1

the push to censor questions

First, there were no questions from you, just strong feelings.

Second, there was no censorship, just chatting

it makes me ask what YOU are doing here?

Just sitting here wondering how much of your dooming should I allow.

1
NeedMoarPillows 1 point ago +1 / -0

Allow? So you would use your mod powers to censor conversation? How do the other mods feel about that?

1
bubble_bursts [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

What I said:

Just sitting here wondering how much of your dooming should I allow.

What you said:

censor conversation?

Clearly we have been giving you too much benefit of doubt.