510
Comments (56)
sorted by:
42
deleted 42 points ago +42 / -0
4
Oldpatriot 4 points ago +5 / -1

Love the post AND the definition!! Exposing it for what it is !!!

2
Cuzzo 2 points ago +3 / -1

They are distinct positions and should not be conflated to mean the same thing.

I may not agree with your choice to take experimental vaccines, but I will defend (maybe not to the death) your right to so do. Sort of like expressive speech.

18
NoApologyTour 18 points ago +18 / -0

They’ve been slowly trying to redefine the word “regulated” over the past century. It used to mean “well maintained”. Now people think regulated means overseen by a governing body.

This of course is important because 2A protects “a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State”.

11
PaPatriot170 11 points ago +11 / -0

They have been calling parents of vaccine injured children this for decades for fighting to keep religious/philosophical exemptions in schools or for asking doctors to space out the vaccine schedules.

2
BigFreedomBoner 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, I wasn't anti-vax before but I assure as fuck am now.

Fact: Liability shields aren't needed for things that you want and are good for you.

Those crazies were right the entire time. And I was wrong. Fuck Big Pharma. Their assets should be seized. Personal assets of shareholders too.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
9
AReckoningIsComing 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's an incredibly powerful tactic.

Look how much of a mess we're in now we have to try to define "woman." It's something we never had to think about before, and now we have to deconstruct it every five minutes.

4
wetsock 4 points ago +4 / -0

Leftism, by ideology, will always push against nature

3
Patriot_Perks 3 points ago +3 / -0

Word obfuscation is a powerful tactic.

However in this case, it grows the ranks of the “anti-vaxxed” community.

By definition most people are now anti-vax because more than not are opposed to mandates.

7
Jackdagger 7 points ago +7 / -0

Orwell was his pen name and he was deep in with the Fabian socialists so he actually was literally writing what the elites were planning for the future at the time.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
Fastfactsmacks 2 points ago +2 / -0

Man you do your homework!Love it God bless!

1
NotInFormation 1 point ago +1 / -0

I upvoted for sure but consider how many other dystopian visions (e.g. The Prisoner, written/directed/starred in by a devout Catholic) also became instruction manuals for leftists.

(In other words, noticing the enemy’s plan does not make one the enemy.)

2
swedy13 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you. Yes, Owell, like most names in history, had ties to the cabal.

6
Sarge58986 6 points ago +6 / -0

You say: anti-vax I say: Fuck-you

2
Phishhed44 2 points ago +2 / -0

You know it Sarge 😎💥

4
DiveAndBait 4 points ago +4 / -0

I am anti vax.

I don't get why this is suppose to be a shame word?

2
SpaceManBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because it makes no sense. It's like being "anti-education" because a large number of schools that claim to be educating children are actually just conducting communist brainwashing. You're not actually anti-education, you'd be anti-communist brainwashing in that scenario. You shouldn't be anti-vaccine, you should be anti-ineffective/dangerous vaccines. And, even if you think that's every vaccine past and present, being anti-vaccine would require that you be against every vaccine including ones made in the future that may actually work and not be dangerous. And being against such a vaccine would be incredibly silly and immensely stupid.

3
Semmelweis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Buy a decade old dictionary at a used bookstore, when you take it to court, tell them that it was before the time of Subscriptions and Boosters and that even though you thought you had updates available all their new words don't appear to have added themselves.

3
CreamSoda 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just remember OP:

1984 written in 1948, published in 1949, Orwell was dead in 1950.

#ThingsThatMakeYouGoHmmmmm

3
russiah 3 points ago +3 / -0

You know the thing is not even a vaccine. It's mRNA therapy for immunity suppression.

3
thorsdisciple 3 points ago +3 / -0

According to the new definition they changed for it, that’s what a vaccine does now

2
Fuhqreddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wasn't George Orwell just a pseudonym for Aldous Huxley? And wasn't Aldous Huxley a decendant of the robber baron families that sought to bring forth a new world order?

All this to say, I think he was writing an instructional manual more than a warning.

3
NeuroticFisherman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Aldous Huxley and Orwell were both from England, but they wrote rather different things even though they were both writing dystopian novels around the same time. Huxley wrote Brave New World and other works like The Doors of Perception. Orwell wrote the mentioned 1984, Animal Farm, and others. If you read 1984 vs Brave New World, the styles of writing are different and their ideas of how a dystopian world of the future would look like were really very different. I always preferred Huxley myself, and he died like 15 years after Orwell I think.

1
BlokeyMcBlokeFace 1 point ago +1 / -0

When he was in his late twenties, Huxley acquired a position at Eton College in Berkshire, where he taught French for a year. He was reportedly a nervous and incompetent teacher who had little to no authority over his students. One of his students was Eric Arthur Blair, who later took on the pen name George Orwell and also became one of the most influential writers of the 20th century.

Orwell, who was greatly inspired by Huxley’s works, said that Huxley was not a good teacher but was a brilliant speaker and had extensive knowledge of French.

Orwell and Huxley remained friends and respected each other for the rest of their lives.

https://www.thevintagenews.com/2017/01/30/aldous-huxley-was-george-orwells-french-teacher-at-eton-college/

1
Fuhqreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ty for the refresher!

2
Fastfactsmacks 2 points ago +2 / -0

Antivaxxer a person who says “kiss my ass if you don’t like my exercise of MY free will!”

2
wolfstatis 2 points ago +2 / -0

This has been doing on since the 60s, use of the biblical words are an easy example.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Brent75 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well isn’t that Special! Those people are stupid!

1
All1000wombats 1 point ago +1 / -0

The war for words is a subtle one, but one that is completely critical.

1
bukkakelord59 1 point ago +1 / -0

and the fact checkers say they weren't changing anything. full of shit!! how do these people live with themselves? so fake! and gay!

1
scoripowarrior 1 point ago +1 / -0

Welcome to Orwell's 1984 world! Remember when Winston's job was to "delete" info and rewrite what he was told? I think it was the Ministry of Truth. They even rewrote "history" in order to remove someone from existence.

1
sackofwisdom 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice find.

1
Dudemanfoo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm ok with them skipping right to "FUCK YOU COMMIE MUTHERFUCKERS I HOPE YOU FUCKING DIE AND IF YOU COME AT ME I'LL GET MY WISH" classification...

1
VetforTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

The entire language called legalese is a fictional language, this is as old as language. Fictional that is.

1
Fastfactsmacks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow I love folks that know WORDS mean what they say and indeed changing it to fit someone’s narrative is not the meaning!

I no longer will say I “understand” for it doesn’t mean as we think I understand what you are saying. it really means you are agreeing to stand under (agree) with what they are saying!

interpret or view (something) in a particular way.

Basically in a court of law if ask “Do you understand?” And you say yes then you just agreed to stand under that view!

Now I said “I know what your words mean but do I agree No! (If I don’t) Fine to say “I understand and agree with what you are saying!”

WAKE UP SHEEP! Oh and please study the behavior of sheep animals they are very stupid! This indeed is my reason I need Christ, I know I need his protection as his sheep!” He is the good shepherd TRUST HIM not the inhabitants of this earth!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
SuckaFree 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bit [they] treat Orwell's words as instructions. And Huxley's. We're living in a conglomeration of A Brave New World/1984.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Donny_Fiasco 1 point ago +1 / -0

I actually think he did write instructions... Or he saw the plans and wrote them down.

1
SirRupert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Merriam-Webster won't make it 100 years if they allow deceit inside the neutral house

1
Phishhed44 1 point ago +1 / -0

(They) don’t DEFINE ME. And WOE to those who try.

1
v8power 1 point ago +1 / -0

How do you know they weren't instructions?

1
Pollycracker 1 point ago +1 / -0

Redefinition has been going on for years. It is especially strong in federal bureaucracies. FCC redefined a network to now include many networks count as one network (Cellular Network, PCS Network, 700MHz Network, AWS Network, 600MHz Network, etc.) ... essentially screwing rooftop properties owners of increased rents. Been going on for years and years.

1
CQVFEFE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ha ha

Leave it to Webster to just invent shit out of thin air and pretend it's "English"

This time it's double X

See, if you used only one X like all the other words with X, no one would know how to say it

Vaccine has two C's, for the K and S sounds, so obviously vax must need two X's because that isn't dumber than a boxx of rocks :p

1
Ogcarvattack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Orwell was part of the cabal.

1
WayTruthLight100s 1 point ago +1 / -0

The new term

Vaxx. FREE ! Vax - free !

1
Fastfactsmacks 1 point ago +2 / -1

Anti—vaxxer ONE WHO EXERCISES FREE WILL and OPPOSE satanic demons who want to experiment on their bodies!

1
Grady_Wilson 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is one of the main tenants in Rules for Radicals.

Change the definition of words to fit the Communist agenda.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Fastfactsmacks 1 point ago +1 / -0

Amen! Words say what they mean why define?

1
NotInFormation 1 point ago +1 / -0

As with precinct elections, we retake the world bottom up. The enemy spent decades infiltrating and consolidating power to control language, media, and education. It won’t be u done overnight.

In the meantime attention is their power. If we direct people to real truth and not just whinge about what they’re doing today, their power is lost (e.g. stop citing Twitter).

1
GoatInTheHat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine not being anti-vax.

1
p8riot 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm all for this, actually. Bigger tent.