They played their cards, made their deals, owned their leaders. In that respect they rightfully owned our congress. They chose to be owned by them and we slept for the same reason.
But, as Trump pointed out, they don't even own Congress anymore.
well, he does phrase certain things in a deliberately vague or confusing way sometimes.
What I notice about this clip, is GEOTUS never says shit like this where it doesn't end up later being proved out to be true. So the part I find the most interesting is that he says they dont own congress anymore.
Whenever he trolls like this, it means it's already a done deal. So what I mean by that is that they didn't 'mayyybe' or 'parrtly' lose ownership of congress anymore... they LOST-lost it. Even if it seems like a premature thing to say, GEOTUS calls things early. Like, really really early, sometimes years and years before the info makes it to the public sphere. And number two, since it's "israel last", and he's publicly trolling them now and calling them out... I'm getting the tingles. Q-team has already been neutering countries right down the list Q gave us, and they've already worked over half that list, the derp state strongholds have been whittled down from a dozen to less than half a dozen, IIRC. If he's now publicly toying with Israel... maybe we are getting down to the end of that list.
it also just occurred to me how salty and redfaced this will make israel. Because if they come out and fight his statement ("nuh-uh, we did not lose congress"), that's an admission that they DO in fact own congress. But if they come out and aknowledge it somehow ("yeah we have lost control of congress"), that's admitting they LOST power. So they can't say shit, and that must piss them right the fuck off.
adl ALWAYS enters the chat. Without fail. They crawl around everywhere like cockroaches trying not to be noticed, and then someone mentions juice anywhere on the entire flippin internet, and they scuttle in to do their thing. It's really getting tired now to watch them jump into ANY rational normal conversation about juice, and hijack it to fake an "alt right vs ignorant normie" fight with their own sock and slide anything that was reasonable about the conversation right into oblivion. And somebody always falls for it, too and starts feeding the trolls. (sigh)
Ten years ago... 1999-2001 Leftist Labor had the PM position, 2001-2009 Leftist Kadima had it. Before and after that was Rightist Netanyahu. And before that it was back and forth between the Left and the Right. So until 10 years ago, both the American Christian elites bankrolling the Right in Israel and the American Jewish elites (bought off by Muslim oil billionaires) bankrolling the Left in Israel believed in their prospects of consolidating control of Israel. Once the Left despaired of regaining control of Israel and Saudi Arabia (our main proxies in the Middle East), immediately Obama was releasing things blaming Saudi Arabia for 9/11 and sending cash to Iran and Iran proxy Hamas. The plan switched from infiltrating Israel/Saudi Arabia politically, to destroying support for them and making support for Iran and Hamas and BDS a requirement for SJWs espousing "intersectionality".
The Jews chose to worship one of the Annanuki...they were not forced. So they were not chosen they chose and although they live for very long lifespans they are not immortal. When they die that's the end of them!
Watch Clif highs videos on our human origins and our acquatic creators. I think in there he talks of Jews choosing Jehova an annunaki ...they pretend they created us.but they did not.
that's a good one, and love how he splits up his sentences, so there's enough deniability to what he's saying. I'm guessing that he had some kind of training in NLP, public speaking. I've noticed similar styles with other politicians like BC, etc.
He has certain things that he does with words that seem kinda hypno-or-nlp related... for instance he will say things about people he likes such as "we're going to see great things from this person" or "this is a wonderful person" or "what a great guy"
and when he doesn't trust or like someone, he will choose negative framing instead of positive framing like "not a bad guy" or "we wish him the best of luck" or "You could do a lot worse than this guy".
(Also, some people go in for astrology and some don't, but if you do... he is a Gemini. Who tend to be really gifted at "deniability" and word games.)
good examples, glad others see it too; weaving in and out of the conversation with his word choices, always a step ahead of his audience.
and hadn't thought about the astrology side, but yes, just like a Gemini! I was the only non-Gemini in my group of high school friends, tricky thinkers for sure. and makes sense to consider since we also discuss numerology.
Further, I take forever to reach conclusions. Even after I have reached a conclusion, I constantly look for more data points to either support or refute my position.
As I said in another comment at the bottom of this thread; do the research yourself and see what a staggering number of jews there are in positions of significant power all around the world.
Heads of major corporations, wall street, etc. etc. etc. The list is truly endless.
Is this what makes Israel last? Getting rid of Netanyahu and bought-off pols? That Q post says "for a very specific reason not mentioned here." Well, Q managed to mention many, many individuals and groups and states and motives over the years, enough so it would be hard to find one thing that wasn't mentioned.
This is an interesting video: Why Hitler Hated the Jews
Watched the whole thing. Jews were saying they are communist themselves and influence decisions based on profit, not humanity. Hitler saw they had destroyed Russia and thought they were coming for Germany next. They own the banks, the media, corporations, etc. https://www.bitchute.com/video/7RSrKT7w8lcn/
Thanks for the link but I am already aware of this information. I'm aware of the Jews and what they are doing to this country. I'd talk about it more often to get more people to wake up to this fact but it seems that you may get banned if you bring up this topic too often.
For anyone lurking here who is thinking that we are crazy, “anti-Semites“ (whatever the hell that means), bigoted, paranoid or whatever – I am asking you;
Please do NOT take my word for it.
DO NOT listen to me.
Do not believe me, do not listen to, nor believe anybody else who posts here.
YOU go and research YOURSELF - do an early life check on the following people just to start;
-owners, producers, and most prominent actors and actresses in the porn industry
-owners of the biggest and most prominent prominent pornography studios, production companies, distribution, websites, etc.
-owners, executives, founders, major shareholders of the following businesses:
banking
finance
-Wall Street / investment banks / stocks / brokerage, etc.
-US Politicians.
-The people behind a staggering variety of left-wing causes, think tanks, foundations, environmental groups, etc. etc. etc.
Big deal Jews if what ur saying is true answer to Satan so who cares what nationality/race they are/were? To me this whole jews thing is more retarded than black lives matter stuff even and is being pushed so that western people blame jews for their problems and never get ahead in life like the racism thing. You know the jews are like on their fourth vaxx? The jews dont run the world ultimately its just some elite banker families happened to be jewish big deal... but thx tho
Amalek was already destroyed. I Chronicles 4:43 says all the remaining members of Amalek were wiped out. Most people don't learn Chronicles so they are not aware of this.
If your point is that Haman is an Agagite and therefore he's a descendant of Amalek, that supposition is definitely false as Chronicles contradicts it. Nowhere does the book of Esther (Megillah) nor any other book in the Bible define the term Agagite to mean a descendant of Amalek. The idea that Agagite is related to Amalek first appears with Josephus, but it's not of biblical origin. Amalek is long dead.
If your point is that Haman is an Agagite and therefore he's a descendant of Amalek, that supposition is definitely false as Chronicles contradicts it. Nowhere does the book of Esther (Megillah) nor any other book in the Bible define the term Agagite to mean a descendant of Amalek. The idea that Agagite is related to Amalek first appears with Josephus, but it's not of biblical origin. Amalek is long dead.
in Chronicles, the Amalekites were only eliminated in a specific location, not exterminated globally. Agagite is a descendent of Agag, full stop. It's like saying a Californian isn't from California because it wasn't explicitly defined. If all the Mexicans in Mexico were killed, does that preclude a living Mexican in Texas? C'mon, seriously.
in Chronicles, the Amalekites were only eliminated in a specific location, not exterminated globally
In Chronicles is says "the remaining Amalekites" were exterminated. Why do you think this means there were more elsewhere?
Saul killed them down to a single man. Later on David had to deal with a bunch more and a few got away. Chronicles says the leftover is now gone too. Also if you compare the last part of Obadiah with this chapter in Chronicles, you'll see by the wording that it's a fulfillment of wiping out the major decedents of Esau. If you read the rest of Chronicles, you'll see the Edomites were wiped out too, meaning no one from Esau is left.
Agagite is a descendent of Agag, full stop.
If you assume the two must be connected, then you'll come to that conclusion.
In the same story just one chapter earlier, Mordechai is termed a יהודי, a Yehudite (Jew), yet it also says he was not a descendant of Yehudah (Judah) but of Benjamin! He was however from the kingdom/area of Yehudah (Judah).
The Hebrew אגגי can mean descendant of Agag, but it can also mean someone who comes from a place called Agag, which was a city in the Median Empire. Similar to what Yehudite (Jew) meant for Mordechai.
But it can also be translated to be a term for someone who is haughty, which fits Haman's character, or it can mean it in a figurative sense that he acted like Agag, or seemingly trying to get revenge for him.
Given that Chronicles chronicles the total destruction of Esau and Amalek's lineage, explaining אגגי to mean an actual descendant of Agag is a real stretch. It's popularly explained that way, but it does not have a leg to stand on. A close examination of the earliest commentators show that a few mention it, but most shy away from it, and remain silent on the matter. It's probably the most popular explanation today because it ties up the story of Saul (from Benjamin) in a nice little bow, or because people want to show the enemy lives on, but that doesn't make it true.
“Rightfully so.” is concerning, but the man dabbles closely with the Jews in business, politics and his personal life so I guess he has to be careful. The main takeaway here is that a President of the United States has openly exposed that Israel owned the US Congress. That’s is pretty big.
They played their cards, made their deals, owned their leaders. In that respect they rightfully owned our congress. They chose to be owned by them and we slept for the same reason.
But, as Trump pointed out, they don't even own Congress anymore.
I wouldn't be so sure. Sure, they don't own the muslims and few others, but they do the rest. The billion dollar giveaway to Israel passed 420 to 9.
Passed 420 to 9?
420 said yes, 9 said no.
And then after the session got out, they all met up at the clock tower to split a doobie.
As is tradition!
Probably like the old Seinfeld “not that there’s anything wrong with that” when talking about gay people.
Jesuchristo I’m old.
Not that there's anything wrong with that...
He has to preface his comment with "not that I have anything against it" or he's gonna be called antisemite.
That's a nice way to confuse and explain away the words that literally came out of his mouth.
well, he does phrase certain things in a deliberately vague or confusing way sometimes.
What I notice about this clip, is GEOTUS never says shit like this where it doesn't end up later being proved out to be true. So the part I find the most interesting is that he says they dont own congress anymore.
Whenever he trolls like this, it means it's already a done deal. So what I mean by that is that they didn't 'mayyybe' or 'parrtly' lose ownership of congress anymore... they LOST-lost it. Even if it seems like a premature thing to say, GEOTUS calls things early. Like, really really early, sometimes years and years before the info makes it to the public sphere. And number two, since it's "israel last", and he's publicly trolling them now and calling them out... I'm getting the tingles. Q-team has already been neutering countries right down the list Q gave us, and they've already worked over half that list, the derp state strongholds have been whittled down from a dozen to less than half a dozen, IIRC. If he's now publicly toying with Israel... maybe we are getting down to the end of that list.
Nice breakdown Tendie. I agree with past tense of his statement.
it also just occurred to me how salty and redfaced this will make israel. Because if they come out and fight his statement ("nuh-uh, we did not lose congress"), that's an admission that they DO in fact own congress. But if they come out and aknowledge it somehow ("yeah we have lost control of congress"), that's admitting they LOST power. So they can't say shit, and that must piss them right the fuck off.
5D trolling.
saying "Israel owned congress" isnt antisemite. Saying that they rightfully owned congress is a very odd thing to say
Jews will certainly claim it is, even though it is indisputable.
[ADL] - has entered the chat
adl ALWAYS enters the chat. Without fail. They crawl around everywhere like cockroaches trying not to be noticed, and then someone mentions juice anywhere on the entire flippin internet, and they scuttle in to do their thing. It's really getting tired now to watch them jump into ANY rational normal conversation about juice, and hijack it to fake an "alt right vs ignorant normie" fight with their own sock and slide anything that was reasonable about the conversation right into oblivion. And somebody always falls for it, too and starts feeding the trolls. (sigh)
Ten years ago... 1999-2001 Leftist Labor had the PM position, 2001-2009 Leftist Kadima had it. Before and after that was Rightist Netanyahu. And before that it was back and forth between the Left and the Right. So until 10 years ago, both the American Christian elites bankrolling the Right in Israel and the American Jewish elites (bought off by Muslim oil billionaires) bankrolling the Left in Israel believed in their prospects of consolidating control of Israel. Once the Left despaired of regaining control of Israel and Saudi Arabia (our main proxies in the Middle East), immediately Obama was releasing things blaming Saudi Arabia for 9/11 and sending cash to Iran and Iran proxy Hamas. The plan switched from infiltrating Israel/Saudi Arabia politically, to destroying support for them and making support for Iran and Hamas and BDS a requirement for SJWs espousing "intersectionality".
Yup and here come the muh gOd ‘S cHoSeN PeOpLE to defend Israel.
Please tell me how people who look Eastern Europe could possibly be descendants of Moses?
Careful, goyim! You'll trigger (((them))).
The Jews chose to worship one of the Annanuki...they were not forced. So they were not chosen they chose and although they live for very long lifespans they are not immortal. When they die that's the end of them!
I would like to know more about this.
Watch Clif highs videos on our human origins and our acquatic creators. I think in there he talks of Jews choosing Jehova an annunaki ...they pretend they created us.but they did not.
that's a good one, and love how he splits up his sentences, so there's enough deniability to what he's saying. I'm guessing that he had some kind of training in NLP, public speaking. I've noticed similar styles with other politicians like BC, etc.
He has certain things that he does with words that seem kinda hypno-or-nlp related... for instance he will say things about people he likes such as "we're going to see great things from this person" or "this is a wonderful person" or "what a great guy"
and when he doesn't trust or like someone, he will choose negative framing instead of positive framing like "not a bad guy" or "we wish him the best of luck" or "You could do a lot worse than this guy".
(Also, some people go in for astrology and some don't, but if you do... he is a Gemini. Who tend to be really gifted at "deniability" and word games.)
good examples, glad others see it too; weaving in and out of the conversation with his word choices, always a step ahead of his audience.
and hadn't thought about the astrology side, but yes, just like a Gemini! I was the only non-Gemini in my group of high school friends, tricky thinkers for sure. and makes sense to consider since we also discuss numerology.
I always joke with people that Gemini is basically "DENY EVERYTHING"
https://i.imgflip.com/5slty7.jpg
It's not a thing I say that's meant to be taken completely seriously, but people who know Geminis well always snicker at it.
yep that's them & can't look at the meme without hearing this voice. https://youtu.be/HblPucwN-m0
Saving Israel for last ... BOOM!
That’s exactly the thing that popped my mind as soon as I saw the title of this thread.
I really hope that comes true because most of the worlds problems can actually be traced back to (((them)))
So close, the worlds problems can be traced back to sin. My sin, your sin, their sin.
I'm not an anti-Semite. That is an unwise position to take.
Genesis 12:1-3 is the one and only reason God hasn't wiped USA from the face of the earth, yet.
Yeah but at the same time;
I'm a pattern guy.
I look for, and can pretty easily spot patterns.
Further, I take forever to reach conclusions. Even after I have reached a conclusion, I constantly look for more data points to either support or refute my position.
As I said in another comment at the bottom of this thread; do the research yourself and see what a staggering number of jews there are in positions of significant power all around the world.
Heads of major corporations, wall street, etc. etc. etc. The list is truly endless.
Where there's smoke, there's fire.....
Is this what makes Israel last? Getting rid of Netanyahu and bought-off pols? That Q post says "for a very specific reason not mentioned here." Well, Q managed to mention many, many individuals and groups and states and motives over the years, enough so it would be hard to find one thing that wasn't mentioned.
Who k ows
I don’t remember 9/11 ever coming up in any meaningful way in the Q drops, but I could be wrong; it’s hard to keep track.
Huge meltdown over on Gab.
Israel is evil! Synagogue of satan!
This is an interesting video: Why Hitler Hated the Jews
Watched the whole thing. Jews were saying they are communist themselves and influence decisions based on profit, not humanity. Hitler saw they had destroyed Russia and thought they were coming for Germany next. They own the banks, the media, corporations, etc. https://www.bitchute.com/video/7RSrKT7w8lcn/
General Patton statement: https://qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-cdddbc54a3e9aefb0d0e0e7db8bc56b6
Will need to look more into this before I have an opinion. But it was interesting.
Thanks for the link but I am already aware of this information. I'm aware of the Jews and what they are doing to this country. I'd talk about it more often to get more people to wake up to this fact but it seems that you may get banned if you bring up this topic too often.
For anyone lurking here who is thinking that we are crazy, “anti-Semites“ (whatever the hell that means), bigoted, paranoid or whatever – I am asking you;
Please do NOT take my word for it.
DO NOT listen to me.
Do not believe me, do not listen to, nor believe anybody else who posts here.
YOU go and research YOURSELF - do an early life check on the following people just to start;
-owners, producers, and most prominent actors and actresses in the porn industry
-owners of the biggest and most prominent prominent pornography studios, production companies, distribution, websites, etc.
-owners, executives, founders, major shareholders of the following businesses:
-US Politicians.
-The people behind a staggering variety of left-wing causes, think tanks, foundations, environmental groups, etc. etc. etc.
If you are at all conservative; know thine enemy.
Go do the research yourself; early life check.
Have fun!
Big deal Jews if what ur saying is true answer to Satan so who cares what nationality/race they are/were? To me this whole jews thing is more retarded than black lives matter stuff even and is being pushed so that western people blame jews for their problems and never get ahead in life like the racism thing. You know the jews are like on their fourth vaxx? The jews dont run the world ultimately its just some elite banker families happened to be jewish big deal... but thx tho
full interview- https://rumble.com/voefy2-exclusive-ari-hoffman-interviews-president-donald-j.-trump.html
Backup Video Link:
https://files.catbox.moe/5rzqwu.mp4
On the Ari Hoffman show...is it just me or does the host look distressed?
The impending fall of the Erev Rav, Amalek must first be destroyed.
Amalek was already destroyed. I Chronicles 4:43 says all the remaining members of Amalek were wiped out. Most people don't learn Chronicles so they are not aware of this.
https://www.geni.com/people/Haman-the-Agagite/6000000002134736232
If your point is that Haman is an Agagite and therefore he's a descendant of Amalek, that supposition is definitely false as Chronicles contradicts it. Nowhere does the book of Esther (Megillah) nor any other book in the Bible define the term Agagite to mean a descendant of Amalek. The idea that Agagite is related to Amalek first appears with Josephus, but it's not of biblical origin. Amalek is long dead.
Nope. Haman was a descendent of Agag.
If your point is that Haman is an Agagite and therefore he's a descendant of Amalek, that supposition is definitely false as Chronicles contradicts it. Nowhere does the book of Esther (Megillah) nor any other book in the Bible define the term Agagite to mean a descendant of Amalek. The idea that Agagite is related to Amalek first appears with Josephus, but it's not of biblical origin. Amalek is long dead.
in Chronicles, the Amalekites were only eliminated in a specific location, not exterminated globally. Agagite is a descendent of Agag, full stop. It's like saying a Californian isn't from California because it wasn't explicitly defined. If all the Mexicans in Mexico were killed, does that preclude a living Mexican in Texas? C'mon, seriously.
In Chronicles is says "the remaining Amalekites" were exterminated. Why do you think this means there were more elsewhere?
Saul killed them down to a single man. Later on David had to deal with a bunch more and a few got away. Chronicles says the leftover is now gone too. Also if you compare the last part of Obadiah with this chapter in Chronicles, you'll see by the wording that it's a fulfillment of wiping out the major decedents of Esau. If you read the rest of Chronicles, you'll see the Edomites were wiped out too, meaning no one from Esau is left.
If you assume the two must be connected, then you'll come to that conclusion.
In the same story just one chapter earlier, Mordechai is termed a יהודי, a Yehudite (Jew), yet it also says he was not a descendant of Yehudah (Judah) but of Benjamin! He was however from the kingdom/area of Yehudah (Judah).
The Hebrew אגגי can mean descendant of Agag, but it can also mean someone who comes from a place called Agag, which was a city in the Median Empire. Similar to what Yehudite (Jew) meant for Mordechai.
But it can also be translated to be a term for someone who is haughty, which fits Haman's character, or it can mean it in a figurative sense that he acted like Agag, or seemingly trying to get revenge for him.
Given that Chronicles chronicles the total destruction of Esau and Amalek's lineage, explaining אגגי to mean an actual descendant of Agag is a real stretch. It's popularly explained that way, but it does not have a leg to stand on. A close examination of the earliest commentators show that a few mention it, but most shy away from it, and remain silent on the matter. It's probably the most popular explanation today because it ties up the story of Saul (from Benjamin) in a nice little bow, or because people want to show the enemy lives on, but that doesn't make it true.
You can see plenty of other places discusses aspects of this too: https://hermeneutics.stackexchange.com/questions/8193/was-haman-an-agagite https://www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Agag.html https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agagite
Sure does.
WHY is it that WE Americans are not allowed to OWN our own Congress, but the Fucking Israelis can????
Have any of you asked yourself that Question???
The U.S. Congress should NOT be OWNED by anyone other than the Americans, and we should NEVER be sending MONEY OR EQUIPMENT OR BOTH to them.....
17th dimension
Lmao, well that's one way to start a convo Don, you fucking madman.
“Rightfully so.” is concerning, but the man dabbles closely with the Jews in business, politics and his personal life so I guess he has to be careful. The main takeaway here is that a President of the United States has openly exposed that Israel owned the US Congress. That’s is pretty big.
Plain english
Soft disclosure?
He's talking in the past tense like we don't live under ZOG this very moment lol
Wowza. Bingo. Next on the forward agenda.
They were replaced by Chyna.