25
Comments (16)
sorted by:
6
MAGAnic316 6 points ago +7 / -1

Also bewbs...

8
donjongun 8 points ago +8 / -0

bewbs=art

setting the bar low, i see

4
MAGAnic316 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fact: All the best art had bewbs in it.

Renaissance vs modern art, where we now have pretentious professors fawning over the contents of a trash can glued to a canvass board and calling it “bold and revolutionary”.

Not my fault I’d rather look at bewbs 😆🤷🏼‍♂️

3
donjongun 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hey, i aint knocking it

5
ramennov 5 points ago +5 / -0

If video games are not art, then neither is film.

2
FeeFiFoeFi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who is even arguing that video games aren't art. A child's doodle is technically "art". Probably garbage art, but still art. F- from Maddox, anyone else remember him? Anyway.

1
AlfredicEnglishRules 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Witcher has been used a cultural signifier by the Polish. So it is part of their great art.

Skyrim is Scandinavianish, so there has been concerts in Sweden about it with people celebrating their culture using that music.

1
smashorbz 1 point ago +2 / -1

as a pol, i resent this game. Way too many anti catholic/pro jewish overtones in the story for my liking, and the females are way too frigid.

1
ChickNorris 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've seen other videos from this game and the graphics are fantastic! Definitely art!

I remember watching my exhusband play COD on the playstation and it was like watching a war movie it was so realistic.

1
christianknight 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is a porn game though...

jk, im not a sperg

-5
free-will-of-choice -5 points ago +1 / -6

What if another "artist" suggests beautiful fiction; in combination with your ignorance towards reality; to transmute reality into the consequences of your ignorance? What if your self destruction represents the beauty that entertains them?

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8d/An_Illustration_of_The_Allegory_of_the_Cave%2C_from_Plato%E2%80%99s_Republic.jpg

1
GulDukat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol imagine actually believing this mish-mash of pseudo-intellectual babble actually means something.

-2
free-will-of-choice -2 points ago +1 / -3

actually means something

Can nature offer information without meaning or is it those within nature that lack comprehension of what all perceived means?

imagine actually believing

To believe represents to consent to the conflict of reason (belief in truth versus false). Could you give me an example where nature offers false information to your perception?

1
GulDukat 1 point ago +1 / -0

IT, pronoun, nominative it used to represent an inanimate thing understood, previously mentioned, about to be mentioned, or present in the immediate context

TO, preposition, used for expressing motion or direction toward a point, person, place, or thing approached and reached.

The essential ITness of a thing represents the motion, reality, of ONE. To be 'TO' is to be in relation to ALL, in motion of ALL things and ITs.


This is kind of fun, just picking random words, presenting their definitions, shitting out some random meaningless babble that sounds sort of deep and intellectual if you don't look too closely or think too hard, and gives the impression of saying something of real value when you didn't really say anything at all. I can see why you like doing it so much.

I will say though, at least when you're using your /Graphenium alt, you aren't quite as much fun. Just as pretentious, but not as entertaining.

-2
free-will-of-choice -2 points ago +1 / -3

an inanimate thing

What defines life? The motion from a beginning towards an end. Now your ass is sitting on a chair that you eventually have to repair/replace. Why. Because motion corrupts and destroys all set into it; so your chair; "the it" is defined by the motion from a beginning towards an end.

Could it be that ALL motion "animates" all the ONEs within?

used for expressing motion or direction toward a point

a) doesn't motion define direction (beginning towards end)?

b) is there anything in existence; any ONE within ALL that doesn't move from a beginning towards an end; that isn't defined as being finite through motion?

The essential ITness of a thing represents the motion, reality, of ONE.

Could it be that ONE merely represents the consequence of an action set into ALL motion; and not the motion itself? Reality represents ALL; while the ONE represents a potential within the potentiality of it.

To be 'TO' is to be in relation to ALL, in motion of ALL things and ITs.

Yes. What does "to" imply? "From to" aka from beginning to end aka in motion aka constantly changing. If you comprehend this then allow yourself to question the three affixed states of "time" (past; present and future) within a system based on constant change?

Could it be that "time" is being suggested; and the consenting to believe it; tricks ONE to ignore motion (reality) for affixed beliefs (fiction)? Could then the past represent the self inflicted trauma of uphold loss; the future the trauma of hope and fear; and both together as present; causing the trauma of self imposed stress?

Could the suggestion of "time" simply represent an inversion of reality (motion) to trick us to ignore reality for a fiction (beliefs; -isms) controlled by others?

This is kind of fun, just picking random words, presenting their definitions, shitting out some random meaningless babble that sounds sort of deep and intellectual if you don't look too closely or think too hard, and gives the impression of saying something of real value when you didn't really say anything at all. I can see why you like doing it so much.

It's called adaptation to inspiration and it builds ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived information. Keep doing it; not for others; for the sustenance of self.

Also; "random meaningless"...if all actions have consequences within motion; then how can anything be random aka without direction? Sounds like a contradiction to me...motion without direction. And of course if motion defines direction for all within; then how can anything within be meaningless?

babble

The allegory for that is the "Tower of Babel"...BA'BEL, noun [Heb.] "Confusion; disorder". They keep building the foundation of fiction through the suggestion of words (in the beginning was the word aka spell-craft); but the reality of motion will always corrupt and destroy the tower the believers of fiction are building. They dumb fictitious complexity (the laws of men) onto reality based simplicity (the laws of nature) to deceive us into consenting to ignorance (want) over adherence (need).

your /Graphenium alt

I never used alternative accounts; I kill my main when it gets too big; or when a cult of personality is attaching itself to it. I also don't use names; brands; idols; hence attacking me by name "free-will-of-choice" always backfires on those who try. Furthermore I don't submit (offering threads) or pass judgments onto others (up/down voting)...and yet I'm always in balance.

entertaining

Enter Tame Mind...who's offering entertainment and how could it benefit them to enter and tame the minds of those who consent to it by free will of choice?