This man speaks properly and logically despite having a different philosophy or interpretation of the world; I think he does have some wishful thinking and a lot of what he thinks are hypotheses that need to be tested first, but ultimately I enjoy reading his views and even end up agreeing with a lot of his points.
When I see him get debated I usually see him be the bigger man and actually speak properly while the other guy acts triggered the whole time. For fucks sake, we're better than this.
Form a proper thesis, followed by the contentions that back that up, provide evidence for the contentions with conjecture thrown in there, and wrap it up with a conclusion. That is how you formally prove a point. In a book those contentions are called chapters, in a short form discussion those contentions are 1-3 paragraphs. Just repeating yourself over and over again without doing any of this is the shit that niggers do - be better than a screeching sheboon at McDonald.
Who is the Prime Minister?
Who is the Mayor of London?
Who is the First Minister of Scotland?
I want to see their manifesto.
Jews and niggers not allowed to respond, we already know what your answer is