57
Comments (12)
sorted by:
14
Dominion4UsAll 14 points ago +14 / -0

Then why test unvaccinated people who lack symptoms? They are just as likely to fight off the infection.

7
Hiromant 7 points ago +7 / -0

That wouldn't help the narrative.

2
Merkava_4 2 points ago +2 / -0

The narrative seems to be that the human immune system doesn't exist.

10
Cheesemaker 10 points ago +10 / -0

How to make an effective vaccine:

  1. Tell everyone it is effective
  2. Run a different test on people who are vaccinated so that you get fewer positive hits
  3. When this doesn't work, stop testing altogether.
6
pkvi 6 points ago +7 / -1

Imagine that the lefties wanted everything back to normal so they looked like heroes but didnt realize they needed to turn off the PCR means of testing so the everything is covid generator kept producing results on local levels and now upper tiers are trying to maneuver out by displacing cause on the only things they can. Its one possibility.. that they are per usual dumb planners.

5
Socialismsuckz 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh now they think people can fight it off and shouldn’t be counted? These people are a joke.

4
CynicalTwit22 4 points ago +4 / -0

If vaxxed people would stop getting sick...

2
PatriotsVsCommies 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the EXACT argument Trump made last summer. “I told my people to slow the testing down. If you test more people, you’ll find more cases!”

2
HuggableBear 2 points ago +2 / -0

Testing everyone for every little sniffle skews case numbers

YOU DON'T FUCKING SAY?

WELCOME TO LAST APRIL, FUCKWITS

1
tuchodi 1 point ago +1 / -0

How often does this happen? Is it statistically significant?

3
clemaneuverers [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is intentionally very hard to know, since it was decided from the beginning by the CDC to basically not report "breakthrough infections" unless the "vaccinated" people are hospitalized or die from their "infection". Also it was strongly encouraged to subject "vaccinated" PCR to fewer cycles, creating fewer false positives compared with the higher threshold for "unvaccinated".

And yet WaPo still practically saying here it's wrong to count "breakthrough infections" among vaccinated with no strong symptoms or illness. If it's wrong for them it's wrong for the "unvaccinated" too.

1
tuchodi 1 point ago +1 / -0

So we don't know if it's important?