14
Comments (30)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
muslimporn [S] 3 points ago +5 / -2

Links...

May add more later.

Involved in Libya propaganda campaign.

Public support for military interventions is both critical to secure and invariably difficult to maintain. While foreign-policy specialists frequently underscore the importance of having a compelling strategic narrative to legitimise military intervention, most studies fail to explain how transmitted government narratives are actually mediated by the press and ultimately received by the public. Thomas Colley examines the public's response to the UK's strategic narrative on the 2011 military intervention in Libya, assessing the UK government's use of several strands in its messaging and exploring how these were mediated and received by the British media and public.

He was almost definitely working on the Syria campaign, in Clinton's camp effectively. Clinton lost votes because of her interventionist policies and because of the collapse of the narrative in Syria. Trump ultimately signified the failure of their war campaign.

/pol was a major source of counter propaganda. NATO took over reddit (Atlantic Council is NATO, who because their chief of policy).

I'm a British sleuth. We put enormous efforts into manipulating US politics and controlling its interventions. Christopher Steele was one of ours. There's a good chance Q was too. Heck Guccifer 2.0 could have been one of ours.

There's a special relationship we have where usually we can do stuff the US can't with intelligence and vice versa so we use each other for loopholes. The DNC is able to use British intelligence against its opposition in the US for example in ways it wouldn't get away with domestically.

If I was looking to hire someone with the skills and experience, including the background to be Q, this would be the perfect CV.

Q Data:

4
ghost_of_aswartz 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can't tell if you are for or against FIVE EYEs. I'm guessing against. You are coming across as a white hat, but then you say your'e a UK sleuth--i assume contractor turned patriot--and I tend to distrust everyone who is ex-CIA or ex-MI6 is actually just still lying to us while pretending to be white hats

1
muslimporn [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's obvious that 5 eyes is becoming increasingly corrupt. In principle it should be a good thing. In practice what has been readily apparent is that it has been abused and has taken on a life of its own.

I think a lot of people miss that the deep state is one form of a concept which is manifest in other ways such as global networks.

The thing is not enough American's as asking questions about British ties and political interference. We sort of have a blank cheque to interfere with each other.

If you think my take on five eyes is from Q, it's not. I was raising this back in 2016 and Q's discourse is often derivative of conversations already going on. It was blatantly obvious at the time that the Anglosphere or 5 eyes was against Trump and resources were being drawn from it to try to depose Trump or basically trying to implement regime change in the USA shifting from the NATO narrative of Assad must go to Trump must go.

1
JollyJoker 1 point ago +2 / -1

Important post, thank you.