posted ago by MrBabySpam ago by MrBabySpam +9 / -0

When Joe Biden told the story on video where he says "Fire the prosecutor or you're not getting the money" did he really commit a quid pro quo? If not how does the left justify his comment?

Comments (19)
sorted by:
6
BeetlejuiceForSenate 6 points ago +6 / -0

Glenn Beck lays out the big picture around the time of the first impeachment. The video is almost an hour long because it's so convoluted with all the people involved. He follows the money and lays out a succinct timeline from 2014 onward.

It wasn't just Biden, it was the people in the highest levels of government in the USA and Ukraine. Long story short, yes, Biden is directly implicated in corruption and they impeached Trump for suggesting to investigate it.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
MrBabySpam [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ill check it out but how does the left justify that famous line "Fire the prosecutor or you're not getting the money"?

3
BeetlejuiceForSenate 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've personally not heard any real explanation. As far as I'm aware they ignore it, or deny it, or claim it's out of context. Which would make sense since it's incriminating. So their response (that I've seen) is intellectually dishonest misdirection. I remember watching the impeachment debate in congress live and that's what Democrat members of congress did. Deny, deny, deny and projection.

2
MrBabySpam [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

I cant believe its all been forgotten and swept under the rug. I will never forget about that comment he made and how they turned it around on Trump. Fuck the uniparty.

2
BeetlejuiceForSenate 2 points ago +2 / -0

"It was a perfect phone call!" :)

2
TallestSkil 2 points ago +4 / -2

It literally doesn’t matter, because no one will ever be punished.

-1
MrBabySpam [S] -1 points ago +1 / -2

You sound very demoralized. That or you are a shill.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +2 / -2

You sound very demoralized.

In what way am I incorrect? Describe in detail, please.

#No one. will ever. be punished.

Not for this, not for anything else. Keep lying to yourself at your own peril.

1
MrBabySpam [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

For one, you think it will always be like this. Just because democrats currently hold many positions of government and therefore power - doesnt mean they always will. We cant just throw our arms up in the air and say fuck it its all over why try. That is a defeatist coward attitude.

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

For one, you think it will always be like this.

Do you have any evidence to the contrary?

Just because democrats

I don’t give a shit about the jewish false dichotomy. There is one party. It votes identically on all issues. Nothing. EVER. changes.

doesnt mean they always will

Literally proved to you a year ago that elections do not exist and have not existed for the last 50 fucking years. They’re on video admitting vote stealing for that long.

NO.

ONE.

ANYWHERE.

DID.

ANYTHING.

ABOUT.

IT.

We cant just throw our arms up in the air and say fuck it its all over why try.

So do something that actually works. Prove to me you give a shit.

1
MrBabySpam [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

What are you doing about it besides trying to convince me there is nothing I can do?

0
TallestSkil 0 points ago +1 / -1

Getting you to wake the fuck up from your delusion that anyone is going to fight back against any of it. Ever.

Because they’re not. You don’t understand collapse. You don’t understand “happenings.” There is no pushback. I’m sick and fucking tired of you retarded hope-ists with your delusional fantasies. It’s nothing but pain and torture for yourselves and others.

Prove me wrong or don’t reply. Note that words are completely meaningless, so you’ll have to cite this shit you claim is “happening.”

1
MrBabySpam [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wake up and do what? Quit like you?

1
ApparentlyImAHeretic 1 point ago +2 / -1

The rules don't apply to your betters, peasant.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Kaarous 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. Also graft. And much, much more. Every Democrat is a criminal and a traitor, it's just a matter of figuring out the particulars.

1
DC-SNIPEHUNT 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah probably. Obama basically used the Ukrainian Nationalist Azov Battalion armed far right to overrun the Kiev authorities and start a civll war in the country. They couldn't or didn't see how Russia could annex Crimea and secure their Black Sea Navy Fleet. This Lil Gambit was the Obama administration thinking they had more levarage than they did on Russia's doorstep. A similar type of proxy conflict is ongoing in Syria.